Publication
Original publication date
Collection
Subjects
Description
Fiction. Romance. Historical Fiction. HTML:#1 New York Times bestselling author and "queen of royal fiction" (USA TODAY) Philippa Gregory weaves a spellbinding tale of a young woman with the ability to see the future in an era when destiny was anything but clear. Winter, 1553. Pursued by the Inquisition, Hannah Green, a fourteen-year-old Jewish girl, is forced to flee with her father from their home in Spain. But Hannah is no ordinary refugee; she has the gift of "Sight," the ability to foresee the future, priceless in the troubled times of the Tudor court. Hannah is adopted by the glamorous Robert Dudley, the charismatic son of King Edward's protector, who brings her to court as a "holy fool" for Queen Mary and, ultimately, Queen Elizabeth. Hired as a fool but working as a spy; promised in wedlock but in love with her master; endangered by the laws against heresy, treason, and witchcraft, Hannah must choose between the safe life of a commoner and the dangerous intrigues of the royal family that are inextricably bound up with her own yearnings and desires. Teeming with vibrant period detail and peopled by characters seamlessly woven into the sweeping tapestry of history, The Queen's Fool is a rich and emotionally resonant gem from a masterful storyteller.… (more)
User reviews
Ms Gregory seemingly cannot refrain from the hatchet job sexual stereotype of a scheming child using her sexual charms to gain advantage. The description of Elizabeth I in this book is unjustified. Elizabeth stayed alive by her wits not her sexual attraction and she did not hate her sister with the passion portrayed in this book. The flirtation with Philip of Spain is not historical. Yes he was interested but not as a result of overpowering passion. Like Elizabeth, Phiippe did things for political reasons including his marriage to Queen Mary. By most accounts Elizabeth found his marital intentions frightening and it only emerged shortly before the death of Queen Mary. There is no doubt that he used his influence to protect Elizabeth from a traitor's death but that again is a very politically astute action. She was likely to be the next Queen.
I liked the symathetic portrayal of Queen Mary. She was by nature as a child kind and generous with strong moral convictions. Historians now recognize that her cruel sufferings as a child and young woman had taken its toll and did affect her ability to govern. In particular, she could not control her obsession with religious persecution or moderate its practice based on any practical concerns about her popularity and the well being of her country. This portrayel of Mary suggests that to some extent, jealousy and revenge fuelled her religious obsession which then allowed Mary to indulge it through (to her)valid service to God. Very convenient, but very human and she was far from the first powerful monarch or churchman to fall prey to this notion.
Her portrayel of Lady Jane Grey is dead on in her reluctance to either marry or be Queen. She was a child victim of the manipulations of her family.
The portrayel of Robert Dudley is fanciful but not inconsistent with his history.
The book also contains an examination of the plight of the Jews in Europe at that time and the sufferings of Jews in Spain and the frantic flight of many of them to other countries including Britain. The destruction of learning was also described but it is important to remember that the destruction of learning was carried out by Protestants as well as Catholics.
On the whole, I would recommend this book but don't imagine that you are being given a history book.
14 year old Hannah Green and her father are Jewish and have been running since Hannah's mother was burned at the stake in Spain. They come to England, where Hannah is brought to King Edward's court by Robert Dudley to serve as a fool when he discovers she has the gift of "sight". While
Between Robert, Mary and Elizabeth, Hannah is keeping company with and serving three different people with three different agendas. In the meantime, Hannah is betrothed to Daniel, a Jewish boy who has been hiding in England with his own family. Can Hannah keep up with all the deception and treachery that happens at court without getting herself and her Jewish family into trouble?
As much as I've read about the Tudors, I haven't actually read much about Mary, so this was interesting. I know it's fictional, but of course, there is some truth to the events in the story, though Hannah and her family are entirely fictional. This is the second Philippa Gregory book I've read, and another one I've really enjoyed. I will be reading more.
However, an interesting book to read.
I wasn’t much enamored with the book. My biggest problem was with the characters. I felt there was very little depth to them, particularly on an emotional level. They felt rather wooden, simply going through the motions of history. Hannah was shallow, irritating and was conveniently in the right place for the big historical moments. Often she came across as more of a plot device than anything else, and on a few occasions I wondered why she wasn’t cut completely and the story told from the perspective of the actual historical figures.
Queen Mary stood out as being more well rounded, though I still feel that there wasn’t sufficient depth given to her changes of heart in places.
It did get better towards the end, where Hannah’s personal story is given a bit more space. It was also nice to see her grow into a more mature character. In the beginning, in particular, she comes across as being far too outspoken for someone who has lived so many years in fear. Nor do I feel that her “Sight” is sufficient excuse for this plain-spokenness, given how rarely this gift manifests itself.
All in all, it was vaguely interesting to see how the historical characters were portrayed, but it has not won Philippa Gregory another fan.
Relatively slow in getting absorbed by the story, and befuddled by the heroine, Hannah’s, obsession with Lord Robert (really? as simple as a young girl
My two key likes.
A) The book made me re-look up the British Monarch history. (The books’ general history was mostly accurate.)
B) Gaining some insights to the plight of the Jews in that era, noted as 1552 to 1558, hiding and concealing not just their faith, but also the associated customs, language, and knowledge. The relationship amongst the Jews, how they helped each other remain concealed throughout Europe, had a flavor of the Underground Railroad.
Ultimately, other than a perspective of history via the eyes of an intelligent young lady, this book did not offer substantial substance to me. Perhaps it was not meant to be either.
This book was not so creatively written that entertained my typical desire for learning new ways to manipulate words. Here are just a few quotes, partly for its content and partly for the charm of the sentence(s).
“Elizabeth was always such a mixture of raging emotion and calculation that I could rarely take her measure.”
“Books were my brothers and sisters; I could not turn against them now. I could not become one of those that see something they cannot understand, and destroy it.”
“And so I would rather not spur your wife’s irritation into rage if you are going to blow in and out again like a spring wind that spoils the peace of the orchard.”
I slogged through the first third of the book skipping the repetitive sections and slogged through the second third of the book hating all the main characters. The last third of the book I finally started to like Hannah, the protagonist. Then the book was done.
Really, very little happens. Most of the book is spent with the naive Hannah, appropriately employed as a fool, allowing herself to be used alternatively by Lord Robert, Princess/Queen Mary, and Princess Elizabeth. She lives at times with Mary, who spends the book sick, paranoid, or in a religious fervor and at times with Elizabeth, who spends the book sick, paranoid, or in a manic sexual fervor.
We spend 250+ pages bouncing back and forth between the Tudor women, listening to them decry each others' behavior. The book added nothing to my historical or cultural understanding of the era, lacked depth (palace intrigue was superficially presented although critical to the plot), and the characters were, for the most part, irritating.
A wonderful story telling about the reigns of the two queens. And what it is like to be a heretic, and running from the Inquisitions Flames.
This book is a look inside
This book is a look inside the court from a teenage Jewish girl. She keeps her religion secret as she and her father fled Spain during the inquisition. Her mother was burned at the stake. She is working for her father at his bookshop, dressed as a boy when Robert Dudley discovers her.
She has the gift of the Sight (telling the future - though not always when is convenient for her) and is sent to the dying king's court to be a Holy Fool and foresee the future. Robert Dudley and his friends also involve her in their plots - sometimes willingly, sometimes unwilling.
Along the way, a lot of interesting things happen. The court intrigue, her betrothal, war and so on.
The story is built on a great premise, not only the Tudor history, but also showing the reign of Bloody Mary through the eyes of a girl who lost her mother to a similar religious based killing spree. How could she reconcile this and serve the Queen happily?
Ultimately, it was these sorts of inconsistencies in the book that dropped it from a 5 star rating to a 4. Though the inconsistencies were addressed, I didn't find the reasoning plausible enough. It didn't make sense to me.
Overall, I love historical fiction and I like a little romance and drama mixed in. The characters and setting was interesting, and I may have even learned something (keeping in mind of course, that it is still fiction and not everything should be taken as gospel truth). I'll try and get my hands on more of her Tudor series very soon
This is the only book I've read by Philippa Gregory; I'm not sure I'll pick up another one. This was a light entertaining read, but it does not stand up to the works of Jean Plaidy
The one thing I found interesting was the author's attempt to instill Mary I with some sympathetic qualities. It was a difficult job - no doubt given the
I found it hard to care about the main character. She was pretty preposterous - and even annoying at times.
All in all I would definitely skip this book if you haven't read it.
However, I found Elizabeth to be almost indistinguishable from Anne Boleyn -
Neither Mary nor Elizabeth gained my sympathy, even with the troubles they both experienced.