Series
Publication
Original publication date
Collections
Genres
Awards
Description
Anthony Horowitz has yet again reinvented the classic crime novel, this time writing a fictional version of himself as the Watson to a modern-day Holmes. One bright spring morning in London, Diana Cowper -- the wealthy mother of a famous actor -- enters a funeral parlor. She is there to plan her own service. Six hours later she is found dead, strangled with a curtain cord in her own home. Enter disgraced police detective Daniel Hawthorne, a brilliant, eccentric investigator who's as quick with an insult as he is to crack a case. Hawthorne needs a ghost writer to document his life; a Watson to his Holmes. He chooses Anthony Horowitz. Drawn in against his will, Horowitz soon finds himself a the center of a story he cannot control. Hawthorne is brusque, temperamental and annoying but even so his latest case with its many twists and turns proves irresistible. The writer and the detective form an unusual partnership. At the same time, it soon becomes clear that Hawthorne is hiding some dark secrets of his own. A masterful and tricky mystery that springs many surprises.… (more)
User reviews
Here Horowitz places himself in the position of being offered a job writing about a difficult but admired ex-detective working as a consultant to the police on the murder of a woman who had pre-purchased her own funeral only hours earlier. Over and over the plot is disrupted by descriptions of Horowitz' own plans, projects, personal concerns. Just way too distracting, and even if the character was based on a fictional author it would have been a poor choice. I guess I just didn't get the joke.
The first of his novels that I encountered was The House of Silk which he was commissioned to write by the Estate of Arthur Conan Doyle, and which recounted a ‘lost’ Sherlock Holmes adventure which, for reasons which become evident as the story progresses, Dr Watson had undertaken to defer from publication until all the protagonists were dead. Horowitz captured the feel of Conan Doyle’s original stories admirably, and the book represented a valuable addition to the Sherlock Holmes canon.
Following that success, he was commissioned by the Estate of Ian Fleming to write a new James Bond book, which came to fruition as ‘Trigger Mortis. Once again, he captured the feel and style of the original books – far more capably than Sebastian Faulks, and to my mind almost on a par with William Boyd’s excellent Solo. Indeed, I suspect that writers as accomplished as Boyd and Horowitz probably found it painful to have to lacerate their own laudable style to match the mediocrity of Ian Fleming’s prose.
He followed this with another venture into Holmes’s territory with his excellent Moriarty, which recounted the exploits of that arch criminal and featured a major twist that I certainly didn’t see coming, and then addressed the traditional whodunit with a homage to Agatha Christie in The Magpie Murders, one of the finest example of meta-fiction that I have read recently.
In his latest novel, Horowitz has returned to meta-fiction but with a different twist. He himself is one of the leading characters, which allows him to offer an insight into the modus operandi of a busy professional writer. The novel opens with a description of an apparently healthy middle-aged woman visiting an undertaker to make the arrangements for her own funeral. Six hours later she is murdered in her own flat.
We are then taken across London to encounter Horowitz himself, and from that point on the novel is narrated in the first person by him. Horowitz is approached by Hawthorne, a former Detective Inspector in the Metropolitan Police, who had previously assisted some of the television programmes on which Horowitz had worked, offering advice about procedural issues. Hawthorne describes the woman’s death and explains that he has been retained by the police in the capacity as a consultant to assist the investigation. In the meantime, he wishes to strike a deal with Horowitz. Basically, he wants Horowitz to write a book about his investigation, and demands fifty per cent of the takings.
The relationship between Horowitz and Hawthorne is prickly to begin with, and generally deteriorates from there. They do, however, start to make progress, though Hawthorne is definitely taking the lead. There is always a danger when novelists start to play with the format, mixing fact and fiction and incorporating themselves as character, that the intricacies of the format might predominate, leaving the development of the story to stumble along behind the gimmickry. Horowitz fights clear of that, and delivers a perfectly balanced novel. He states at one point that he is an admirer of Agatha Christie, and he seems keen to copy her spirit of experimentation. It has certainly worked here.
Horowitz cleverly entertains in this send up of classic detective novels while writing a modern-day mystery of his own. This is an incredibly compelling and quick read - I read it in two work days. Some readers may find it a little too clever by half, but I enjoyed that aspect of it and laughed out loud at a couple of scenes. It was all I could do not to look up articles on what Horowitz took from real life (for example, he mentions his own books and screenwriting) and which were entirely fictitious, but I wanted to avoid spoilers. While the ending
The novel proceeds and the usual suspects are introduced and portrayed before the reader, the hope always being that the murderer can be identified from the clues presented. To me the real pleasure of reading this story was the comical and descriptive writing on display by an established and respected author;....."Again, I found myself wondering what it must be like to work there, sitting in a room with those miniature urns, a constant reminder that everything you were and everything you'd achieved would one day fit inside."......."For him, politeness was a surgical mask, something he slipped on before he took out his scalpel."...."There was a sense of something in the air that might have been damp but was actually just misery."...."wearing a suit that could have come out of a charity shop- or should have been on the way to one."...."You never realize how fragile everything is until it breaks."..."It was as if she had been locked up in a lunatic asylum for so long that she had forgotten she was actually mad."....
So with a cunning and clever plot, mysterious and intricate characters all presented in an entertaining dialect "The Word is Murder" is a highly enjoyable and recommended read.
It is probably a novel that would benefit from more study and from robust discussion in a book group.
The Word is Murder is a well-written, well-plotted and exceedingly clever book containing all the elements that make up a good mystery novel: a premise that grabs the reader right from the first page; interesting characters with convincing motives; lots of red herrings sprinkled throughout that make you think at the end, wait, how did I miss that; plenty of twists and turns and sly sleight-of-hand to distract the reader from the real culprit; and, as added bonus, a nice touch of humour. He also provides some very fascinating insights in the life of a writer by bringing many of his own experiences into the novel and, like in the rest of the story, one is left wondering how much fact is mixed in with the fiction. In past novels, Horowitz has paid homage to Sherlock Holmes, here he pays homage to Christie and, in doing so, he has produced one compelling and, overall, just plain fun story.
Thanks to Edelweiss+ and Harper Publishing for the opportunity to read this novel in exchange for an honest review
As the Watson in this partnership, Horowitz deftly blends fact and fiction in letting us glimpse
Like Sherlock Holmes, Hawthorne can be extremely annoying; in fact, I think he has Holmes beat. My jaw dropped when Hawthorne broke into Horowitz's important meeting, and it was around this time that his behavior reminded me of stepping in something. No matter how much you twist and drag your foot, that something refuses to dislodge itself. That's Hawthorne when he wants something. (When Horowitz needs something, it's a completely different story.)
But when you put two wonderful characters together and then add a plot that resembles Russian nesting dolls on a massive dose of steroids, magic happens. I figured parts of the mystery out but came nowhere close to knowing the whole thing. Small details of appearance, of speech, of family history, of job history-- and more-- play their parts in the mystery. One small event can have implications for all those that follow, and there are always consequences. It's just a marvelous piece of storytelling.
I read that The Word Is Murder is the first in a series, and I couldn't be happier. I can't wait to see what Horowitz has up his sleeve next!
The plot is interesting. A former police officer, Hawthorne, who still consults for the police, is asked to investigate the murder of a
But I did not like either Hawthorne or Tony very much. The book sagged in part because of the prickly relationship between these two men. I kept waiting for more and that comes very slowly.
The audiobook is narrated by Rory Kinnear and his performance is excellent and would make a very fun title for a family road trip.
Thanks to the good folks at Libro.fm for offering booksellers a free copy of this audiobook.
It wasn't bad, story wise. The storyline was pretty good, but I couldn't get into it. Unlike the Sherlock Holmes books by Anthony—that I absolutely loved, by the way—this
The lead character, Hawthorne, is kinda like Sherlock, but worse in all the bad qualities Sherlock had. I did not like Hawthorne one bit, and maybe that also affected my take on the book.
I loved the way the author included himself in the story as a sidekick, and how he mixed facts with fiction. He's really good at that, to be honest.
But overall, the book had just too much description and not enough action for my taste. I really wish I'd had liked it better, but I guess I'll have to wait for the author to write another Sherlock Holmes novel.
Oh my gosh, it is so very, very clever! I absolutely adored it!
The murder? A woman walks into a funeral home, plans her funeral and is found murdered six hours later. Ex police detective
Hawthorne is such a great character - a brilliant detective, but somewhat lacking in personal interactive skills. I quite liked him. He reminded me a bit of Cormoran Strike. The publisher describes Horowitz as a Watson to Hawthorne's Holmes and its a spot on description. I had so much fun reading Horowitz's description of himself, his thoughts and reactions. Can you imagine the writing process? The interactions between the two are wonderfully depicted.
And just as well done is the actual mystery. Hawthorne picks up on the smallest clues and discrepancies. Horowitz also tries to investigate, but doesn't have the skill set of Hawthorne. It's not clear who is the culprit and I was kept guessing alongside of our protagonists.
Clever, clever, clever. The Word of Murder is excellent reading. And....there is a sequel coming called Another Word for Murder. Can't wait!
Even after having finished reading the novel and the acknowledgements, I am not sure if this is all based on a true story or if Anthony Horowitz is just a great inventor. However, it doesn’t really matter, what matters is first of all, did I enjoy reading the novel? Yes, absolutely, it is so much fun and I hardly could put it away. And second, how was the murder case? Cleverly constructed, surprising, simply fantastic. I could stop here since it is clear that “The Word is Murder” is a must read of 2017.
The novel starts a bit surprisingly. You get Mrs Cowper walking into the undertaker’s and so on. Then, quite abruptly, there is a break and the author is starting to talk to you and you learn that you just read a chapter of a book which is to be written. So, he takes you out of the novel you were just reading into another novel about the writing of that specific book about the woman you have just encountered. This is quite a unique start, but it fits in quite well and I like surprises like this.
As summarised before, the murder case has everything you could ask for: several suspects, all with dubious behaviours and clear motives. Quite outstanding characters which give you much to puzzle over. Nevertheless, it all fits together perfectly in the end and the here again, the motivation comes quite as a surprise but is absolutely reasonable and coherent with the whole plot.
Concerning the characters, I liked the author who is not the perfect detective who knows it all, who has doubts about what he is doing, sometimes a guilt conscience and a conversational tone which makes it easy to indulge in the story. Hawthorne on the other hand is only presented through the eyes of the narrator, thus never objectively presented and definitely a bit bizarre – but I liked him nevertheless.
All in all, a humorous crime novel which additionally benefits from Horowitz’s masterly writing skills.
I am an Agatha Christie fan and clearly Horowitz is too. I love how he takes the classic mystery formula and turns it on it's head. Clues unravel as we closer and closer to the truth of what happened. If there is one misstep in the book it is how Horowitz deals with homosexuality. It is revealed that Hawthorne is homophobic and Horowitz is repulsed by this but no explanation is ever given for why Hawthorne feels that way and it is never really resolved or addressed. Aside from that I did enjoy the mystery and am still a fan.
When Ex-Detective Daniel Hawthorne asks writer Anthony Horowitz to follow him on an investigation and write about it, little did either of them
The characters are all written with full clarity of who they are, what they look like, and fthe kind of people they are.
The scenes are describe in detail, so you can see them clearly in your head. The dialog ring true. It's sdhard to tell that this is fiction. The ending is not what I expected and I love when an author can surprise me like that.
I truly enjoyed this book. I plan on reading more Horowitz in the near future, or watching some of his tv series. The only reason I gave this book 4 stars instead of 5 is because sometimes the details were a little to much or too repetative. Although some details were important to the conclusion and needed to be repeated and ground into the brain, so the reader wasn't confused by the outcome.
Thanks New Haven Public Library!