Publication
Original publication date
Collections
Awards
Description
Machiavelli praised his military genius. European royalty sought out his secret elixir against poison. His life inspired Mozart's first opera, while for centuries poets and playwrights recited bloody, romantic tales of his victories, defeats, intrigues, concubines, and mysterious death. But until now no modern historian has recounted the full story of Mithradates, the ruthless king and visionary rebel who challenged the power of Rome in the first century BC. In this richly illustrated book--the first biography of Mithradates in fifty years--Adrienne Mayor combines a storyteller's gifts with the most recent archaeological and scientific discoveries to tell the tale of Mithradates as it has never been told before. The Poison King describes a life brimming with spectacle and excitement. Claiming Alexander the Great and Darius of Persia as ancestors, Mithradates inherited a wealthy Black Sea kingdom at age fourteen after his mother poisoned his father. He fled into exile and returned in triumph to become a ruler of superb intelligence and fierce ambition. Hailed as a savior by his followers and feared as a second Hannibal by his enemies, he envisioned a grand Eastern empire to rival Rome. After massacring eighty thousand Roman citizens in 88 BC, he seized Greece and modern-day Turkey. Fighting some of the most spectacular battles in ancient history, he dragged Rome into a long round of wars and threatened to invade Italy itself. His uncanny ability to elude capture and surge back after devastating losses unnerved the Romans, while his mastery of poisons allowed him to foil assassination attempts and eliminate rivals. The Poison King is a gripping account of one of Rome's most relentless but least understood foes.Some images inside the book are unavailable due to digital copyright restrictions.… (more)
User reviews
An interesting book but the presentation borders on academic dishonesty.
A book that broadened my intellectual horizons and gave me
The thing that really sticks out about Mithradates is how much studying and reading he seemed to do. Not only Greek histories, tragedies and poetry, but the lives of people he admired like Cyrus the Great and Alexander (also Great). But unlike some rulers who might only know the facts presented, Mithradates seems to have actually learned from them and put some contrary schemes into practice. One that Tigranes (oh, he's Great, too) should have listened to was to NOT engage directly with Roman legions who time after time, wiped the floor with the often cobbled-together eastern armies, but to engage them with guerrilla type actions. In addition to his ideas about military tactics, he was a master of toxicology, probably pioneering that field and inventing what would go on to be a famous concoction for inuring oneself against poison. I wouldn't have wanted to be his enemy during his experimentation phase. And if that wasn't enough it was determined through his writings and various treaties and spy networks that he spoke and read at least a dozen languages with so much fluency that he almost never needed translators. What an intellect.
At the end after his defeat by Pompey (another Great!), the author speculates that Mithradates's death may have been a hoax and that he may have lived with his last remaining "wife", Hypsicratea, in her native lands. I say remaining wife because through his direct action, most of his previous queens were put to death because of suspected plots against him and just plain getting tired of them. Sucks to be on the receiving end of Mithradates's favors. His family didn't escape either with most of his siblings and children either exiled, imprisoned or executed. It ran in the family though, with is own mother trying to bump him off when he was a child so that is far more pliable brother (also called Mithradates) could be put into power instead. Ah, poor mom. She should have known better.
My only quibble was the amount of speculation: "perhaps", "it could have been this way....", "maybe". But this work seemed well researched as far as it went, with incomplete primary sources.