Publication
Original publication date
Collections
Genres
Awards
Description
A tale of a woman's romantic entanglements with two anthropologists--and the odd mating habits of humans--from the author of Jane and Prudence. Catherine Oliphant writes for women's magazines and lives comfortably with anthropologist Tom Mallow--although she's starting to wonder if they'll ever get married. Then Tom drops his bombshell: He's leaving her for a nineteen-year-old student. Though stunned by Tom's betrayal, Catherine quickly becomes fascinated by another anthropologist, Alaric Lydgate, a reclusive eccentric recently returned from Africa. As Catherine starts to weigh her options, she must figure out who she is and what she really wants. With a lively cast of characters and a witty look at the insular world of academia, this novel from the much-loved author of Excellent Women and other modern classics is filled with poignant, playful observations about the traits that separate us from our anthropological forebears--far fewer than we may imagine. … (more)
User reviews
As might be expected, there's a good deal of quiet fun to be had with all the little quirks and eccentricities of these people. Academics are always a good target, of course. It's interesting that Pym also brings in social class as a complicating factor here, something that usually plays very little role in her books. Both Tom and the professor come from distinctly upper-class backgrounds, which we are made to see as sitting uneasily with their choice of an unfashionable academic discipline (instead of a more traditional career in church, army or parliament). There is social awkwardness when a group of undergraduates are invited for a weekend at the professor's country house, and mutual incomprehension when Tom goes back to his home village in Shropshire.
Although the structure of the book is clearly Pym's own - the plot resists neat resolutions; characters are generally relieved to find themselves not paired off after all - the settings seem to owe something to P.G. Wodehouse. Instead of the usual bleak North London suburbia, we have a group of neighbouring houses in Putney, not a million miles from Wodehouse's beloved Valley Fields (Dulwich). Assignations are made and lawnmowers borrowed over the garden fence, and the grumpy retired anthropologist could easily be one of Wodehouse's colonels or ex-governors. Shropshire is also very much Wodehouse country, although Pym did come from Oswestry herself, so that might be merely coincidence.
Barbara Pym worked with anthropologists for many years, so they are a recurring theme in many of her books. Anthropologists make cameo appearances in some of Pym’s other novels (such as Everard Bone from Excellent Women, who has a cameo appearance in this book; Emma from A Few Green Leaves; and Tom Mallow is an early version of Rupert Stonebird from An Unsuitable Attachment), but Less Than Angels is really the only one in which the actual study of anthropology plays a major role. I loved the comparison that Pym makes between the studies of this group of people and observations of human society as a whole. There are a few stock characters that Pym went to again and again; in this one, she uses the young-spinster stereotype (Catherine), the cad, clergymen, and the eccentric academic (plenty of those in Less Than Angels, to be sure).
I also love the connections she makes between each of her books through the use of recurring characters (therefore I think it’s best that you read Pym’s books in order of publications, because she really built upon each book as she wrote them). Undoubtedly, our favorite character is meant to be Catherine, whose wisdom and sensibility is a contrast to Deirdre’s youthful naïveté.; and I got the feeling that Pym was silently mocking tom behind his back. But it’s so subtle that you almost don’t notice it. Less Than Angels is one of my favorite books by an author already favored.
Within a group of anthropology students, Deirdre has fallen for Tom, who has just returned from studying tribal life in Africa. Tom is living with a slightly older woman, Catherine, who makes a living by writing romance fiction but e decides to move out and pursue a relationship with Deirdre. To further complicate matters, he still has feelings for his first love, Elaine. Students Digby and Mark are fairly passive observers but add some humorous moments as do Deidre’s mother and aunt, who scrutinize the world from their bedroom window. And the comic characters, Esther Clovis and Gertrude Lydgate, make a return appearance (previously seen in Excellent Women) and like to be thought of as a guiding force for the young people.
It’s all very light stuff, as is usually the case with Pym, until right near the end where she throws a curve that I never saw coming. I think it was supposed to allow for the resolution of some of the loose ends but, for me anyway, it served no purpose and was so unexpected that I can’t imagine what possessed her.
I hope my next Pym, A Glass of Blessings, is more like the other Pyms I’ve read.
I think I have found my "blanky" in Barbara Pym. God's in his Heaven (or hers) and all's well with the world when I read Barbara Pym. I am using her books as relief from some of my more worthy and good for you (like multi-grain bread) reads.
Less than Angels is my second Barbara Pym. I was delighted to find a reference to some of the characters from my first - [14407::Excellent Women] - but it is not necessary to have read it to follow the story. It just deals with a different group - a bit like those multi-layered films that are so popular these days like Shortcuts - where storylines slightly intersect.
A friend from bookclub has lent me four books from her Barbara Pym collection and lest I "forget" to return them, I assiduously returned this as soon as I had finished, so I'm sorry but I can't quote from it.
All I need say to encourage you to read it is that I laughed out loud and snorted on several occasions. Ms Pym has that marvellous ability to describe characters forced to live closely together in straitened circumstances - usually family members...and the way they carve out a modicum of privacy, self-determination and/or sanity in shared households. Her descriptions of the two sisters living together with one sister's adult son and daughter is classic. I'll leave it to you to guess which sister I wanted to smack on frequent occasions.
There's so much more I could say but doubtless others have waxed enthusiastic before me...if you haven't read Barbara Pym yet, don't waste another moment.
I stumbled upon Barbara Pym within the confines of Library Thing. Barbara Pym even has her own group within Library Thing.
I’m a member.
I couldn’t put the novel down and I hated the realization that I had finished. I’m a slow reader and Ms Pym’s work seemed to have the
Ms Pym’s ability to cut to the bone is phenomenal. With plane simple language and characters that seem almost ghost like in their actions I found my self writing words in the margin”
“Rude!”
“Despairing.”
“Funny.”
“Lonely.”
I often would scribble around the margins trying to answer the question why. Why with this writer’s ability to write with such agility and candor the sadness of our lives, do we still find ourselves with more knowledge and so little wisdom?
Within one scene, the aunt of a rather lost and self-centered anthropologist approaches his former lover. The scene was anguishing as the aunt realizes that her nephew has left his lover for a younger woman but the woman blunders on about a dance for her daughter and actually discusses the hopes that her nephew can supply suitable young men to dance with her overly tall daughter. The scene is underscored by the almost third person analytical attitude the jilted woman takes of the conversation. It seems as if she was watching her own amputation.
Each character had his or her own comic and tragic aspects – and again what impresses me so about Ms Pym’s novel is her ability to maintain the overall humanness of each character. Every page turned was an amazing read.
I have my next Pym novel waiting in the wings, A Few Green Leaves, and I’m very much looking forward to it. According to the cover, this novel was her last. A last novel does not depress me – and I know as I approach grim old age, I’ll re read Ms Pym’s work. The world is a better place with her work in it.
I am also resolved to discovered more about this authors life. That alone should signify the immense impression this woman has made upon me with her writing. Not very often am I intrigued enough about a book as to where I want to learn about the person behind the fiction.
Thank you Barbara Pym. Thank you very much.
I didn't know a thing about anthropology except what it was when beginning this book and still don't. But I know that wasn't the purpose of the book. Pym has strayed from her middle aged spinsters of the Vicar's club to a younger group while keeping some of her
Though this book didn't work for me on many levels I still had to give it 3 stars as Pym's writing is always perfection no matter the storyline.
Tongue firmly in check, Pym writes:
"Felix had explained so clearly what it was that anthropologists did (. . .) They went out to remote places and studied the
In addition to the observations of those returned from Africa, Pym observes the townies observing their suburbanite brothers, women observing men, students observing graduates . . . all the word’s a foreign culture to someone. 4 stars
Read this if: you want to try one of Pym’s gentle satires that doesn’t concern the Anglican (or any other) church.
I don't know 1950s Britain in the least but this felt so true, like a window into reality. Pym has a wonderfully understated way of observing the world, and can sum up a great deal in just a few sentences.
Read and reviewed in 2013
This book raises the question of who is better equipped to observe and describe human nature – the anthropologist or the fiction writer? (Advantage: fiction writer. It’s obvious that Catherine understands Tom and his behavior better than Tom understands himself!) Pym gives several nods to her earlier novel, Excellent Women, with the reappearance of Esther Clovis and repeated mentions of Everard Bone and his wife Mildred. At a point of crisis, Catherine reflects that “I’m not one of those excellent women, who can just go home and eat a boiled egg and make a cup of tea and be very splendid…but how useful it would be if I were!”
By focusing on the young (but, of course, Pym was hardly old when she wrote this novel), the author transmutes her usual world weary melancholy into a great sense of uncertainty: young people for whom it is still possible the world might yield up all of its cornucopia of treasures... even as we're aware that the middle-aged characters in the story have settled into their routines, half complacent and half unsatisfied.
There isn't really a central character here; Tom Mallow, he of the grey eyes and aristocratic bearing, seems like the most likely candidate, but we end up spending most of our time with Deirdre and Catherine, his two paramours. They both deliver in their own ways, especially when caught off-guard by a plot twist late in the novel that may be unique among Pym's works. The world here is again one of quietly Anglican lives and of the secular anthropologist, desperate for a grant equal to their intellectual talents but usually disappointed.
I suspect at this stage in my life I prefer Pym's more evidently amusing novels: Jane and Prudence, Some Tame Gazelle, Crampton Hodnet among them. But Less than Angels intrigues in its own way as a study of melancholy, and rewards with its cavalcade of characters attempting to follow etiquette but often grievously aware that others around them are taking liberties. Classic Pym in many ways.