Status
Available
Call number
Genres
Collection
Publication
Oxford University Press, USA (1996), Paperback, 488 pages
Description
Classic Literature. Fiction. HTML: The first novel in what would be a remarkable but tragically curtailed creative career, Virginia Woolf's The Voyage Out recounts the tale of Rachel Vinrace's literal and metaphorical journey. En route to South America on one of her father's ships, Rachel undertakes her own voyage of self-discovery as she interacts with a motley crew of passengers, through whom Woolf takes the opportunity to savagely satirize the bourgeois mores of Edwardian England..
Media reviews
"The Voyage Out" is Virginia Woolf's first novel, published in 1915, and offers an insightful exploration into the themes of youth, love, and the journey towards self-awareness. The story follows Rachel Vinrace, a young woman who embarks on a sea voyage to South America aboard her father's ship,
Show More
the Euphrosyne. Throughout the journey and her stay in a fictional South American country, Rachel is introduced to a variety of English expatriates and travelers, each contributing to her understanding of the world and herself.
As Rachel navigates through the complexities of adult society, relationships, and her emerging desire for independence and identity, Woolf delves deep into the inner workings of her characters' minds, employing a psychological narrative style that would come to define her later works. The novel addresses themes such as the stifling nature of Edwardian society, the quest for personal freedom, and the complexities of love and marriage, all while showcasing Woolf's burgeoning talent for stream-of-consciousness storytelling. "The Voyage Out" is not just a tale of physical journey but also a profound exploration of the transition from adolescence into adulthood, marking the emergence of Woolf's voice as a significant literary figure in modernist literature. Show Less
The voyage out is een roman als een schip, traag en majestueus golft ze van de bladzijden. Virginia Woolfs eerste is een weldaad. Nu die roman uit 1915 eindelijk als De uitreis in vertaling is verschenen, kunnen we kort zijn over de reden waarom het zo lang duurde: stekeblinde beroepslezers ter
Show More
plaatse. The New York Times kon het ook niet bekoren. In 1920 poogt de krant de vuistdikke roman samen te vatten in vier zinnen en begint daartoe als volgt: ‘Ridley Ambrose, a professor, and his wife, Helen, a woman of the smart London world, are going to the antipodes on a vessel owned by Helen’s brother-in-law, Willoughby Vinrace.’ Een zin die je een beetje doet grinniken als je het boek net hebt uitgelezen. Show Less
So the story maunders on, and the fact that it is crowded with incident, most of it futile, and that the clever talk by every one continues in a confusing cataract in every chapter, does not save it from becoming extremely tedious.
User reviews
LibraryThing member pieterpad
I'm saddened at the negative responses to this book. Woolf's later novels eclipse her first, I suppose: too bad. This is descriptive, sensitive, and thoroughly interesting, and perhaps a little autobiographical. I've never been a girl in her early maturity, but I bet any such would enjoy this book.
Show More
Even years after having read the book. Even now, nearly eleven years after reading it, I recall scenes, conversations, states of mind; the book uncannily looks forward to Woolfs later work, while continuing that of Jane Austen. An astonishing first novel. Show Less
LibraryThing member DieFledermaus
This was the first novel of Woolf, which can be seen in the more conventional storyline. It's a coming of age story of Rachel Vinrace, an unformed and cloistered girl. In the opening scenes, she meets her aunt and uncle with whom she's had little contact. Helen has a vibrant and gregarious
Show More
personality while her husband is a bookish scholar who almost disappears from the novel. Rachel goes through the standard life-changing events - a new companion in Helen, the journey away from home, and love. After arriving in South America, Helen and Rachel fall into a group of other Brits. As in some of her later books - To the Lighthouse, Between the Acts, even The Waves - Woolf follows the thoughts of the whole group. Especially interesting was Susan Warrington, an unmarried girl getting up in age. She's there to help her elderly aunt who thinks of her as almost a servant. Susan dreads a life of insignificance, never free to do what she wants, always part of someone else. Unexceptional and awkward, she doesn't have good prospects for marriage. However, Arthur Venning takes an interest in her and they wind up engaged. Certainly they'll only end up as a middling couple - noted by St John Hirst and Terence Hewet - but it's really the best she can hope for. Hewet and Rachel pair off while Hirst and Helen start spending more time together. Hewet is sensitive, sometimes sentimental, a contrast to his wry, witty friend Hirst but Rachel has almost no personality at all. Her one characteristic is that she is an expert piano player. Under Helen and Hewet, she not so much as develops a personality but has them rub off a bit on her. A trip up the river is her last, as she falls ill. Ironically, after 20 odd years of not doing much, she dies when she'd finally started interacting with the outer world. The book was odd in that the heroine could not at all be said to have a strong or even well-defined personality so much prefer Woolf's later, more experimental fiction and would recommend those. Show Less
LibraryThing member laura1234
I don't understand all the negative reviews saying, "I'll excuse this because it was Woolf's first book." Maybe this book hit something personal for me, because I absolutely loved it. Loved the style, loved the plot, loved the characters. I even loved how Woolf invents an imaginary South America
Show More
(no mountains near the Amazon that I know of...) and peoples it with upper-class English who light the fire after dinner (one would burn up on the equator!). It's like Jane Austen "tripped out", excuse the pun. Show Less
LibraryThing member GarySeverance
Rachel Vinrace is a character whose life in England is structured by Victorian ideas of the proper development of young women. Her outer life is restricted by her maiden aunts, and her inner life is kept in check by self-discipline in her piano playing and the restraint imposed on her imagination
Rachel has an opportunity to take a voyage out of her bonds on a cruise to South America. She begins to loosen her self restrictions as she studies the artificial and real motives of her fellow travelers. While on her father's ship, Rachel's liberation is as slow and determined as her piano playing, staying with the composition but engaging in a few private improvisations.
While staying at a hotel in South America, the pace of Rachel's development accelerates. As she accompanies other brave souls on a short guided trip into the wilds of the jungle, Rachel's insight races. But she has no meaningful starting point or signposts to guide her in self exploration. Her emotions become increasingly intense and her behavior more erratic as she falls in love with a fellow passenger. Rachel's ideas take flight with striking visual images and loose emotional associations. A common resolution of her out of control improvisations is the complete peace of immersion in an undersea world, a final reduction of "fever."
Virginia Woolf's first novel is an excellent self portrait of budding bipolar disorder. The author sketches this portrait by producing unexpected and "pretty notes" as Louis Armstrong described his jazz. Woolf ultimately found her own underwater peace suggesting the tremendous toll of manic creativity.
Show More
in the kind of literature she is allowed to read. Rachel has an opportunity to take a voyage out of her bonds on a cruise to South America. She begins to loosen her self restrictions as she studies the artificial and real motives of her fellow travelers. While on her father's ship, Rachel's liberation is as slow and determined as her piano playing, staying with the composition but engaging in a few private improvisations.
While staying at a hotel in South America, the pace of Rachel's development accelerates. As she accompanies other brave souls on a short guided trip into the wilds of the jungle, Rachel's insight races. But she has no meaningful starting point or signposts to guide her in self exploration. Her emotions become increasingly intense and her behavior more erratic as she falls in love with a fellow passenger. Rachel's ideas take flight with striking visual images and loose emotional associations. A common resolution of her out of control improvisations is the complete peace of immersion in an undersea world, a final reduction of "fever."
Virginia Woolf's first novel is an excellent self portrait of budding bipolar disorder. The author sketches this portrait by producing unexpected and "pretty notes" as Louis Armstrong described his jazz. Woolf ultimately found her own underwater peace suggesting the tremendous toll of manic creativity.
Show Less
LibraryThing member gypsysmom
This is my first Virginia Woolf book and if I thought all the rest were like this I would not be reading any more of her works. However, this was her first and I am assured that she got better with time and practise so I will probably try again. I listened to this book read by Nadia May and I give
Rachel Vinrace, her father and her aunt and uncle, Helen and Ridley Ambrose, take passage on one of her father's ships to South America. Rachel has lived a very sheltered life with some maiden aunts as her mother is dead and her father travels a great deal. Her aunt Helen proposes to introduce Rachel to modern life. Rachel's father leaves Rachel with her aunt and uncle on an unnamed island near South America where Helen and Ridley are staying in a villa owned by Helen's brother. Near the villa is a hotel where other British people are staying. The hotel is a little bit of British upper class life with proper English breakfasts, afternoon teas, English newspapers and a vicar. Rachel meets Terrance who is one of those Englishmen with no apparent job but an income and the two fall in love in a very short period of time. Other English people are also profiled but they are very one-dimensional. Apparently Woolf meant this book to satirise Edwardian life and the people do seem to be almost caricatures.
The ending was rather a shock. Just when I had gotten used to not much happening there was a sharp change and then the end. Not my cup of tea for the most part although Woolf does show a facility with the English language.
Show More
May full marks for making the book as interesting as she could. From the internet I gleaned that Nadia May is a "nom de mike" for Wanda McCaddon who has narrated over 600 books. I'll be looking out for more books narrated by her.Rachel Vinrace, her father and her aunt and uncle, Helen and Ridley Ambrose, take passage on one of her father's ships to South America. Rachel has lived a very sheltered life with some maiden aunts as her mother is dead and her father travels a great deal. Her aunt Helen proposes to introduce Rachel to modern life. Rachel's father leaves Rachel with her aunt and uncle on an unnamed island near South America where Helen and Ridley are staying in a villa owned by Helen's brother. Near the villa is a hotel where other British people are staying. The hotel is a little bit of British upper class life with proper English breakfasts, afternoon teas, English newspapers and a vicar. Rachel meets Terrance who is one of those Englishmen with no apparent job but an income and the two fall in love in a very short period of time. Other English people are also profiled but they are very one-dimensional. Apparently Woolf meant this book to satirise Edwardian life and the people do seem to be almost caricatures.
The ending was rather a shock. Just when I had gotten used to not much happening there was a sharp change and then the end. Not my cup of tea for the most part although Woolf does show a facility with the English language.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Chris_V
Virginia Woolf's debut novel tells of the long sea journey made to South America by young Rachel Vinrace, about her friendship with the older Helen and her falling in love with Terrence Hewet. Life however intervenes in a capricious way. An exciting read which signposts the explorations in
Show More
fiction-writing she was to take later in her career. Show Less
LibraryThing member GraceZ
I probably didn't do the book much justice by reading it in the space of a few months, and stopping halfway through to read something else. The characters and names were very confusing, but that's obviously my own fault, and not a critique of the book. I didn't see the end coming at all. Most
Show More
importantly, I did live the writing. It was descriptive and effective and creative. But I'll probably have to read it again sometime in a more dedicated way. Show Less
LibraryThing member bodachliath
I found this decidedly easier reading than the more experimental later novels (particularly The Waves, which required a high level of concentration. This was very moving in places, and contributes to understanding the later books too.
LibraryThing member thorold
Not quite what I was expecting — at times it's almost like one of E.M. Forster's "the English abroad" novels. But there are also some very characteristically Woolfish things about it. I loved the cameo appearance by the Dalloways and enjoyed the passages where Woolf suddenly started striding out
On the other hand, there are obviously some problems with it. The most glaring one is the accident of history: Woolf had a hard time with her health while she was writing the book (from 1910 onwards) and it took her so long to finish it that someone had shot an Archduke in the meantime, and a great deal of what she says about social status, work, death and suffering, religion, the role of women, Russia, etc. is totally and utterly irrelevant to the world of 1915. Or indeed to the post-war world. Anyway, the social satire in the book has been edited down and concealed to such an extent that you almost need a microscope to find it (she does discuss a few topics that might have been considered very daring at the time, had anyone noticed that they were there...). And it does ramble a bit. There are passages, especially in the "South American" part that just seem to duplicate each other, not really advancing either the action or our understanding of the characters.
Show More
confidently with something very like her mature style. It was interesting too to watch what were obviously the first sea-trials of the famous shifting-point-of-view narrative technique. So it definitely satisfies the rule that you can't have too much Virginia Woolf. On the other hand, there are obviously some problems with it. The most glaring one is the accident of history: Woolf had a hard time with her health while she was writing the book (from 1910 onwards) and it took her so long to finish it that someone had shot an Archduke in the meantime, and a great deal of what she says about social status, work, death and suffering, religion, the role of women, Russia, etc. is totally and utterly irrelevant to the world of 1915. Or indeed to the post-war world. Anyway, the social satire in the book has been edited down and concealed to such an extent that you almost need a microscope to find it (she does discuss a few topics that might have been considered very daring at the time, had anyone noticed that they were there...). And it does ramble a bit. There are passages, especially in the "South American" part that just seem to duplicate each other, not really advancing either the action or our understanding of the characters.
Show Less
LibraryThing member rcooper3589
Well, I tried to finish this book but I just couldn't do it. I couldn't stand it any longer. It's horrid. I found the book so slow and so boring. It doesn't help that I'm not a big fan of drama/love stories about English society in the early 1900's either. I didn't care about any of the characters-
Show More
they were all whinny brats on vacation. I did, however, appreciate Woolf's forward thinking in regards to women in politics and education. That was nice. That, however, was the only nice thing. After over 200 pages I just couldn't read the next 200. No way. I really tried. Really, I did. Oh well... hopefully the next book is good. Show Less
LibraryThing member DanielSTJ
Very good for a first novel. Woolf does not disappoint-- not in the least. The characters are the vivid and the romance is an especial highlight. The setting is variable, but interesting nonetheless, and the prose is marked by poetical language that bears the majesty that accompanies the gifts that
Overall, I was very satisfied. I typically am not such a fan of Woolf's work-- but this one seems to be an exception. Still, I was impressed.
Show More
Woolf had at writing.Overall, I was very satisfied. I typically am not such a fan of Woolf's work-- but this one seems to be an exception. Still, I was impressed.
Show Less
LibraryThing member janeajones
Virginia Woolf completed Melymbrosia, her first novel in 1910, but she did not publish it until 1915 after two complete redraftings and retitling it as The Voyage Out. Louise DeSalvo, a Woolf scholar, spent seven years at the Berg Collection piecing together the early manuscripts until she
The basic plot line and characters of the two versions are the same, but the writing in The Voyage Out is more highly refined and somewhat more oblique than in Melymbrosia. The protagonist of the story is Rachel Vinrace, a young woman in her early 20s, daughter of the owner of a fleet of ships that trades in South America. Her mother died in childbirth, and she was raised by her two maiden aunts in Richmond, outside of London. Like most privileged young women of the time, her education was spotty, but she is a talented pianist, who has not really been afforded the training to make her a serious one. She has embarked upon a South American voyage on one of her father's ships along with her maternal uncle and aunt, Ridley and Helen Ambrose. When the ship arrives at the Ambroses' destination, a villa in Santa Rosa, an European tourist spot, Helen convinces Rachel and her father that she should stay with them until her father completes his business further up the Amazon. In the village near where the villa is located is a tourist hotel. The interaction of the denizens of the hotel and the villa and the growing awareness by Rachel of the expectations of English society and her place within it define these rites-of- passage novels.
There is a ship of fools quality to the picture of this microcosm of privileged British society caught in a colonial getaway for a few weeks. Woolf chronicles the male privileging, the female frustration, the sexual hypocrisy and the basic uselessness of most of the members of this society. The two forays made by the adventurous ones in the troupe, up a mountain trail and down the river to a native village, are completely managed by local guides and laborers who are utterly ignored by those they lead. I was reminded of the river voyage into the interior described by Aphra Behn in Oronooko, and some critics have referenced Joseph Conrad.
In both versions, the writing is exquisite, but Melymbrosia is more savagely satiric, funnier, less inhibited in its depictions of characters and their thoughts, and generally more alive than The Voyage Out. It's certainly not necessary, and indeed somewhat repetitive, to read both versions -- either is revealing as a first novel by a great novelist. Personally, I preferred Melymbrosia.
Show More
established the text of Melymbrosia, and the New York Public Library published it in 1982 with a description of her methodology. That book, long out of print, was re-released by Cleis Press, with a new introduction by DeSalvo, in 2002.The basic plot line and characters of the two versions are the same, but the writing in The Voyage Out is more highly refined and somewhat more oblique than in Melymbrosia. The protagonist of the story is Rachel Vinrace, a young woman in her early 20s, daughter of the owner of a fleet of ships that trades in South America. Her mother died in childbirth, and she was raised by her two maiden aunts in Richmond, outside of London. Like most privileged young women of the time, her education was spotty, but she is a talented pianist, who has not really been afforded the training to make her a serious one. She has embarked upon a South American voyage on one of her father's ships along with her maternal uncle and aunt, Ridley and Helen Ambrose. When the ship arrives at the Ambroses' destination, a villa in Santa Rosa, an European tourist spot, Helen convinces Rachel and her father that she should stay with them until her father completes his business further up the Amazon. In the village near where the villa is located is a tourist hotel. The interaction of the denizens of the hotel and the villa and the growing awareness by Rachel of the expectations of English society and her place within it define these rites-of- passage novels.
There is a ship of fools quality to the picture of this microcosm of privileged British society caught in a colonial getaway for a few weeks. Woolf chronicles the male privileging, the female frustration, the sexual hypocrisy and the basic uselessness of most of the members of this society. The two forays made by the adventurous ones in the troupe, up a mountain trail and down the river to a native village, are completely managed by local guides and laborers who are utterly ignored by those they lead. I was reminded of the river voyage into the interior described by Aphra Behn in Oronooko, and some critics have referenced Joseph Conrad.
In both versions, the writing is exquisite, but Melymbrosia is more savagely satiric, funnier, less inhibited in its depictions of characters and their thoughts, and generally more alive than The Voyage Out. It's certainly not necessary, and indeed somewhat repetitive, to read both versions -- either is revealing as a first novel by a great novelist. Personally, I preferred Melymbrosia.
Show Less
LibraryThing member amerynth
I really didn't enjoy reading Virginia Woolf's debut novel, "The Voyage Out." I just found it incredibly boring... I could only read a few pages at a time before I fell asleep. I didn't connect with any of the characters- none felt particularly realistic nor interesting.
The book more or less
The novel did help me appreciate Woolf's later more experimental novels a bit more-- if this is where she started, it's amazing where she ended up. Ultimately, Woolf is just not an author I really enjoy reading, despite feeling like I really should like her work.
The book more or less
Show More
follows the story of Rachel Vinrace, a young woman who has lived a sheltered life with her aunts. She gets out into the world and starts learning about herself and others. There are a ton of characters who are living in a hotel who populate much of the book.The novel did help me appreciate Woolf's later more experimental novels a bit more-- if this is where she started, it's amazing where she ended up. Ultimately, Woolf is just not an author I really enjoy reading, despite feeling like I really should like her work.
Show Less
LibraryThing member andystardust
It's nearly impossible not to compare this to her later novels, but the elements I enjoy in some of Virginia Woolf's fiction writing are already there: her ability to capture the trains of thought of various characters; her ability to conjure the spiritual from the tangible; and her ability (shared
Show More
with Forster) to render her characters with an affectionate air despite their faults. The real standout for me here is the near disregard for South America as an actual place rather than a mere backdrop to Woolf's drama. My copy includes a back cover blurb from Forster, who refers to the book's "scene" as "a South America not found on any map." I am not sure whether to credit Woolf for capturing the colonialist point of view of the British traveler of this time or to assume she shares the same failing. But I am also still thinking about the title - the various voyages at work here and the various ways of interpreting the word "out." Show Less
LibraryThing member Belana
This has to be the dullest book I've ever listened to. The narrator does a very good job, and I admire her perseverance. If I hadn't agreed to prooflisten (for a librivox recording), I'd have stopped after a few chapters. However, I stood by my promise, and hence listened to the whole thing.
Flat,
Flat,
Show More
interchangeable characters, and what with the constant switching between Christian names and surnames, I'm still having trouble to know who is who -- no character stands out, and I don't care about a single one of them! There's no plot, nothing happens -- just a get together of completely uninteresting people in an exotic environment. There's no rhyme nor reason to the book that I can discern. If I look at all the four and five star reviews, I guess I completely miss the point of this book -- then again, I found an excerpt of an original review in the New York Times (in 1920), who felt exactly the way I feel about this book, so at least I know now that I'm not alone in my dislike of this book. What a waste of time! Show Less
LibraryThing member brakketh
Beautiful dialogue and poetic phrasing.
LibraryThing member mykl-s
This is Woolf's first novel, before she exploded into one of the most famous and best of all English writers. Still, it is a good, maybe great coming of age story. Even Mrs. Dalloway is in it.
LibraryThing member kristykay22
I love Virginia Woolf so much that I have invented a book club where we will read all her books, in chronological order. Just read these sentences and tell me you don't want to read everything this woman has written:
"And now the room was dim and quiet, and beautiful silent people passed through it,
The Voyage Out is first on the list, and it's one I hadn't read before. Telling the story of a married couple and their 24-year-old niece who take a boat from England to South America (with Mr. and Mrs. Dalloway!) for a holiday and there meet a hotel full of English folk. Various relationships start and stop and some exciting things happen, but most of the action is observational and interior. The central section of the book in particular had a Women in Love quality to me (with much less sex and frantic melodrama), but that faded a bit as the story moved to focus on Rachel, the niece, and Terence, who has fallen in love with her. This is Woolf's first novel and was heavily revised and edited before its release -- a reconstruction of the original manuscript has been published as Melymbrosia (the original title) and I'm keen to read that one and see a more radical view of these fascinating characters.
Novel #1 did not disappoint!
"And now the room was dim and quiet, and beautiful silent people passed through it,
Show More
to whom you could go and say anything you liked. She felt herself amazingly secure as she sat in her arm-chair, and able to review not only the night of the dance, but the entire past, tenderly and humorously, as if she had been turning in a fog for a long time, and could now see exactly where she had turned. For the methods by which she had reached her present position, seemed to her very strange, and the strangest thing about them was that she had not known where they were leading her. That was the strange thing, that one did not know where one was going, or what one wanted, and followed blindly, suffering so much in secret, always unprepared and amazed and knowing nothing; but one thing led to another and by degrees something had formed itself out of nothing, and so one reached at last this calm, this quiet, this certainty, and it was this process that people called living." (p. 354)The Voyage Out is first on the list, and it's one I hadn't read before. Telling the story of a married couple and their 24-year-old niece who take a boat from England to South America (with Mr. and Mrs. Dalloway!) for a holiday and there meet a hotel full of English folk. Various relationships start and stop and some exciting things happen, but most of the action is observational and interior. The central section of the book in particular had a Women in Love quality to me (with much less sex and frantic melodrama), but that faded a bit as the story moved to focus on Rachel, the niece, and Terence, who has fallen in love with her. This is Woolf's first novel and was heavily revised and edited before its release -- a reconstruction of the original manuscript has been published as Melymbrosia (the original title) and I'm keen to read that one and see a more radical view of these fascinating characters.
Novel #1 did not disappoint!
Show Less
LibraryThing member therebelprince
A truly beautiful novel. Virginia Woolf's first, this clearly shows her influences in a range of ways, and perhaps it meanders a little too much between Helen and Rachel, and its climax feels like an idea of how a novel should end rather than a thematic conclusion. Yet these are minor quibbles. The
Show More
dialogue, the themes, the range of intimate moments... this is the formation of genius. Show Less
Subjects
Language
Original publication date
1915
Physical description
488 p.; 7.5 inches
ISBN
0192818341 / 9780192818348