Hemmelig Invasion

by Jack Finney

Paperback, 1957

Status

Available

Call number

813.54

Library's review

USA, Kalifornien, Marin County, 1953
Indeholder kapitlerne "1. Forvarsel", "2. Hvem er de?", "3. Massesuggetion - eller hvad", "4. Skikkelsen i kælderen", "5. En uhyggelig opdagelse", "6. Mannies forklaring", "7. Mærkelige hændelser", "8. Frøkapslerne", "9. Panik", "10. Flugt", "11. De
Show More
fremmede", "12. Intet tilflugtssted", "13. Invasion", "14. Fanget", "15. Truslen fra rummet", "16. De grinende skeletter", "17. Flugten", "18. Modangreb", "19. Sejren".
Miles Brennel er 28 år, fraskilt og læge i en lille by. Han bliver opsøgt at Becky Driscoll, der er hans gamle kæreste fra gymnasiet og nu også er fraskilt. Beckys ældre kusine, Wilma, har pludseligt fået en fornemmelse af at hendes onkel Ira og tante Aleda ikke er hendes onkel og tante mere. Det breder sig. I løbet af en uge henvender mindst 10 andre sig til lægen med samme fornemmelse af at et nærtstående familiemedlem virker forkert på dem, selv om der ingen beviser er. Alle de "forkerte" husker til mindste detaljer alt i deres fælles fortid og ser rigtige nok ud ned til mindste ar og uvane. Kun mangler der "et glimt i øjet".
Jack Belicec henvender sig og viser Miles en krop, der ligger i hans kælder. Den ser "ubrugt" ud og er hverken levende eller død. De lader den være, men senere kommer Jack og hans kone Theodora hen til Miles, for tingesten var begyndt at ligne en rigtig person. Miles får fat på en af sine venner, Manfred Kaufmann, der er psykiater og han kommer hurtigt. Desværre er skikkelsen i mellemtiden væk og Manfred bortforklarer det hele som en massepsykose.
Der sker dog flere ting og Miles går igen væk fra at stole på Manfreds forklaring. Måske er Manfred heller ikke Manfred? Jack og Miles finder nogle meget store frøkapsler, som de ikke kender. De iagttager dem, mens kapslerne vokser sig større og efterlader skikkelser lige som det første "lig", dvs underligt blanke og uden fingeraftryk.
Miles ringer til en oberstløjtnant Benjamin Eichler han kender i Washington og får ham sat ind i sagen, selv om forbindelsen knaser og afbrydes fra tid til anden. Men næste forsøg på at ringe op til FBI går slet ikke igennem og da de går på biblioteket for at finde ud af hvornår det begyndte med frøkapslerne, har bibliotekaren skåret alle oplysninger ud af aviserne i arkivet.
Senere dukker politichefen, Nick Grivett, op og vil gerne have dem med ned på politistationen, men de slår ham ned og flygter. De opdager at hele byen Santa Mira er overtaget og at frøkapslerne er ved at blive eksporteret videre til Sausalito.
Becky og Miles bliver fanget af Manfred og en professor Bernard Budlong, der begge er blevet erstattet af frøkapselkopier. Miles får Budlong til at snakke løs for at trække tiden ud. Budlong fortæller at den gamle Budlong stadig er en del af ham for de overfører mønsteret. Det sker når man sover, så Budlong vil ikke gøre Miles og Becky noget ondt, bare vente på at de falder i søvn. Budlong forklarer også at de første forvandlinger skete lidt tilfældigt fordi kapslerne tilfældigt landede der hvor de gjorde, men når først nogle enkelte mennesker var forvandlede, så spredte de frøkapslerne. Fx havde måleraflæseren Charles Bucholtz, forårsaget mere end 70 forvandlinger.
Budlong forklarer at der ingen forskel er før og efter forvandlingen, men Miles ved at toppen af de menneskelige følelser er væk. Budlong er fx ligeglad med den afhandling han gik meget op i før forvandlingen.
Med et suk giver Budlong ham ret og indrømmer også at kopieringen er ufuldkommen. De forvandlede kan ikke formere sig og alt kopieret vil være dødt om højst fem år. Og hvorfor er det nu at Månen er uforanderlig og død? Manfred og Budlong lader sig overtale til at lade Miles og Becky alene, men dog under bevogtning. Miles finder noget opkvikkende medicin. De narrer frøkapslerne til at kopiere to skeletter i stedet for dem selv. Kopieringen suger næsten al stof ud af originalen og tilbage bliver kun lidt støv.
Efter tricket med skeletterne overmander Miles og Becky deres vogtere og stikker af. De bliver hjulpet af at de forvandlede ikke er helt så kvikke og skarpe som før.

Miles og Becky ender med at brænde en masse frøkapsler af og det "skræmmer" resten af frøene så meget at de letter og forsøger at finde en mere venligtsindet planet at slå sig ned på.
Miles og Becky flytter sammen og lever lykkeligt til deres dages ende eller noget.

Pudsig bog, som man vist godt kan læse lidt kommunistforskrækkelse og McCarthyisme ind over.
Gemmer din nabo på en hemmelighed? Dine børn? Din kone? Er de ikke forandret lidt siden i går?
Show Less

Publication

Skrifola, Kbh. 1957

Description

Fiction. Science Fiction & Fantasy. HTML: On a quiet fall evening in the small, peaceful town of Mill Valley, California, Dr. Miles Bennell discovers an insidious, horrifying plot. Silently, subtly, almost imperceptibly, alien life-forms are taking over the bodies and minds of his neighbors, his friends, his family, the woman he loves�??the world as he knows it. Miles knows the invasion is linked to the mysterious seed pods that have been turning up everywhere�??and the pod people are spreading fast. This classic 1955 thriller of the triumph of the human spirit over an invisible enemy inspired the acclaimed 1956 film, directed by Don Siegel and named one of Time magazine's 100 Best Films. Blackstone's edition is read by Don Siegel's son, actor-director Kristoffer Tabori, an Emmy® and Audie® Award winner, and concludes with the narrator's insider reminiscences of his father's work on the… (more)

User reviews

LibraryThing member datrappert
I don't think it's necessary to really speak about the plot of this book. Surely everyone is familiar with it through reading the book itself or through its several movie versions. What I want to talk about is Jack Finney the writer. He has long been one of my favorites, simply because of how his
Show More
stories engage the reader. Reading a Finney story is like having it told to you by a fascinating friend. He does a great job creating the world for each of his stories and pulling the reader into it. The world of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" is not one I would want to live in, but it's definitely one that I would eagerly tour with Finney as my guide.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Robert.Zimmermann
A little uncertain on my reaction to this one. The pod people concept is part of our culture at this point, and this is one of the books (and the movies based on it) that helped bring that into culture. Because of it's influence, I may have gone into reading this with too much expectation. The book
Show More
was ok, but I felt that there wasn't enough actually going on, in the end. I'm left with a feeling that it was bland over all. The ending also wasn't that great for me. But still, it wasn't a terrible read. There were some good parts of it to go along with the parts I had issues with.
Show Less
LibraryThing member CBJames
You all know the story. Small town doctor finds his patients begin making unbelievable claims:

My husband is not my husband, doctor. He still looks like him, he still talks like him, he still knows everything he always knew, but it's not him. I can tell. He's become someone else.

Jack Finney's
Show More
Invasion of the Body Snatchers is a science fiction classic, both as a novel and as a film. The story has become a part of the cultural background of America. I doubt an election cycle has passed since the book's publication without one party or the other being labelled "pod people" by some. The idea that those around us are not human is the pervue of science fiction, but it's also a common sensation, felt by just about everyone who was ever 16, in America anyway. Somewhere in the back of a closet, I have the high school journal entries to prove it.

Mr. Finney gives this feeling life. What if those around you really were not human?

Invasion of the Body Snatchers turns out to be a well-crafted, entertaining novel, even for readers who have seen the movie many times. While I'm not going to make a case for it as great art, it is nice to have a professional quality diversion, an expertly written airplane book if you will. There are even a few moments in Invasion of the Body Snatchers that genuinely gave me the creeps, just the way the original movie did the first time I got the chance to see it on the big screen at a revival house back in college.

And if you went to the same high school I did, or one like it, then you know there really are pod-people out there. In fact they're all around us. You could be next.
Show Less
LibraryThing member DK_Atkinson
It isn't the movie (the 1956 version) and the movie isn't the book - both have something to offer. But the book is superior to the movie in characterization and motivation. All I can say is if you think you’ve seen this story, you haven’t read the book.
LibraryThing member jimmaclachlan
This is a real blast from the past & held up very well over the years. Sure, there are a few real liberties taken with science, but the doctor making house calls was more jarring to me. That was pretty much gone by the 1970's when this futuristic story was to take place, but otherwise it wasn't too
Show More
dated. There were a few science elements that really strained my suspension of belief, but I found it easy enough to roll with them for the story's sake.

I've read this before, but it's been decades & most of my memories are of my favorite film version, the 1978 remake with Donald Sutherland, Brooke Adams, Leonard Nimoy, Jeff Goldblum, & Veronica Cartwright, although it's been done 4 times. The 1956 version starred Kevin McCarthy & Dana Wynter. For all the movies they were in, this might have been their best roles. The 1993 version was just called "Body Snatchers". I don't think I ever watched it, but plan to see the latest remake called "Invaders" done in 2007 with Daniel Craig & Nicole Kidman. Veronica Cartwright is also in it which is pretty cool. She was in the 1978 one & "Alien" too, I think.

[Update: I tried to watch "Invaders", but it was shot from a car cam & I got bored. Never saw Daniel Craig.]

All the movies varied from the book, more or less. The earlier two don't end well for humanity, while I've read that the 1993 version is ambiguous & the 2007 is upbeat. The novel's ending is also upbeat, but a bit too magical for me. One fire in one place & ALL the pods leave, deciding they're beat? Much of the horror element of this book hung on the pods' tenacious spread, so this retreat undercuts that.

Possible spoilers below to those of you who aren't familiar with this SF classic. I don't know how anyone could be, but just in case...

The obvious horror element that people seem to remember, the movies & critics concentrate on is that pods can so perfectly duplicate people that almost no one can tell them from the real one, but they're lacking the vital spark that makes them human, so are a dead end. They will duplicate any living or once living thing, but only last about 5 years before falling to dust. Eventually, the Earth will be as dead as Mars & Luna. That's what the pods do & a point is made, by the pods, that we do, too.

The real horror element is the struggle to believe in the threat, though. The Doctor tells this story in the first person past & his description of his struggle is very believable. The way our minds work in familiar grooves, seeing what they expect, & the everyday logic is what everyone struggles against the most. It's what makes the take over possible. The very idea that pod people could replace someone so exactly is ludicrous & even after seeing proof of it, he is argued around again & again. His senses & interpretation must be wrong, not the world.

It's this struggle that most don't seem to acknowledge which undercuts a lot of the criticisms leveled against the book, IMO. It's worth the suspension of belief to follow this theme through the struggle. Many other unexplained phenomena (St. Vitus' Dance, rains of toads, human spontaneous combustion, UFO's) are mentioned in support of our ability to ignore what doesn't fit. It's probably a scam, lie, or something, so we briefly acknowledge it and move on with our lives smug & safe in our world view. What else are we missing?

The reader did a great job considering he was completely miscast. He had a deep, scratchy, old man voice & the Doctor is only 28 years old, so it just didn't fit, but was still good. Great way to re-read this classic. Highly recommended.
Show Less
LibraryThing member JalenV
It's good to have seen the first two movie versions before listening to the George Wilson-narrated version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Knowing the plot makes the suspense even greater. Mr, Wilson does a good job as Dr. Miles Bennell, first-person teller of the story.

Dr. Bennell, poor man, is
Show More
almost as clueless as an H. P. Lovecraft protagonist who meets an Evil Old Recluse. Despite that handicap, as well as being insufficiently paranoid, he does manage to figure out what's really going on in his hometown of Mill Valley, California. As a bonus, the crisis allows him to hook up again with Becky Driscoll, an old flame from high school.

First Becky is worried because her cousin Wilma is insisting that Uncle Ira isn't really Uncle Ira. Wilma is just the first patient to have this conviction. Miles refers her and others to his psychiatrist friend, Mannie Kaufman. Mannie comes up with a reasonable explanation.

Any chance for a suspicious reader to believe in reasonable explanations plummets when Jack and Theodora Belicec come to Miles' house with a strange story. Only Miles, Becky, Jack, and Theodora seem to realize that something horrible is going on. Is it possible that they're the only normals left in town?

I quite enjoyed an ingenious method Miles uses to save Becky and himself. I also appreciated a scene where Becky gets to be more than a damsel in distress.

Knowing how the first two movies end will not really prepare you for the climax of this book. From what I've read about some critics' reaction, The Body Snatchers (the original title) is more science fantasy than science fiction. I don't care. It's still entertaining.

I first suspected that this audio edition follows the 1978 revision when Miles and Becky went to see a movie, Time and Again, which is another Finney novel that came out in 1970. (I smiled when Miles described the movie as pretty good.) It became obvious when our doctor hero and our heroine went to check the 1976 back issues of their local paper. Were they both divorced in the original edition? If not, I suspect a certain scene was added in the revision.

By the way, if you're listening to the book, you won't get the spelling of a name Miles uses as a code word with Jack, which won't help looking it up. If you're not familiar enough with the Bible to catch the reference, the story of Ananias is told in chapter 5 of the 'Acts of the Apostles.

Unless you insist on scientific accuracy in your science fiction classics, I recommend this audio book. Horror fans should enjoy it, too.
Show Less
LibraryThing member SarahEBear
One from the vault. I picked up a 60th anniversary edition of this one in the States last October. I must admit that I'd never actually read the book, despite being such a huge fan of the films - particularly the version with Donald Sutherland and Leonard Nimoy. The book doesn't disappoint. It is
Show More
well-written, captivating and entertaining. What I particularly like about the book is the short length chapters and the over-all length of the book. My paperback was just over 200 pages. A quick and easy read for the time poor. If you have never read this one, get yourself a copy.
Show Less
LibraryThing member sturlington
A familiar story from the four (!) movie adaptations, this version was revised and updated to coincide with the 1978 movie release. I found the revisions superficial and anachronistic as the general tone of the novel is very 1950s and not at all 1970s (the movie remake did a better job there). That
Show More
took away from the experience of reading it, and I would recommend seeking out the original version instead, or perhaps just watch one of the first two movie adaptations (the later two are not worth watching, in my opinion). In this case, though, I think over-familiarity with the general story takes away from the sense of horror and unease this novel must have produced when first published. Also, the "pod people," while now iconic, don't really make a lot of sense as explained in the novel, and the ending seemed too pat.

Beach read 2015
Show Less
LibraryThing member ghr4
Jack Finney deftly begins this 1950's science fiction thriller with an air of mystery ("I warn you that what you're starting to read is full of loose ends and unanswered questions..."), and then slowly builds an atmosphere of enveloping doom and dread. This short novel, concerning the now familiar
Show More
plot line of alien life-forms inhabiting minds and bodies and thereby subtly changing people in a peaceful California town, is a fast-paced and entertaining read. The references to Fortean phenomena and proposed psychological explanations for the perceived changes in people are clever touches that add to the feeling of uneasiness and uncertainty throughout.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Maydacat
This classic sci-fi tale by Jack Finney is made even better by the superb performance Kristoffer Tabori. In this small town, people don’t seem to be themselves. Oh, they look the same, know the same things, and almost act the same, but something is not quite right. At first, it doesn’t seem
Show More
possible, but soon Miles and his girlfriend Becky are convinced that some sort of things are taking over the bodies of their friends and relatives. The horrifying reality is that they discover giant pods are growing in fields around the town, taking the place of human being. And now Miles and Becky know they will be next, and they have to decide to flee or fight. But what they don’t know is if they can do either one successfully. If you have seen the classic movie of the same name, you still need to read the book, or better still, listen to this audio version.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Nickidemus
The Basics

There’s a mental epidemic going around Mill Valley. People are saying that their loved ones that they’ve known for years are not the genuine article. That they’re somehow fakes, copies. A frightening idea that becomes even more so when it’s discovered they’re right.

My
Show More
Thoughts


This book was fun. It was pulpy, old school science fiction. Not a perfect story by any means, as there were a couple of hitches and the writing style wasn’t spectacular and it got cheesy in spots. Yet I enjoyed it a lot. That’s simple personal preference. I happen to have a lot of affection for science fiction that can be a little loose with its science and focuses on intrigue and adventure.

Admittedly, there were some moments when it seemed that the main characters had conveniently forgotten things they’d witnessed before. Or when, and this is a sin I can’t forgive, without any evidence whatsoever, a character jumps to some insane conclusion. And they’re right. Miles, the narrator and local doctor, conjectures at one point that if he autopsied the body of an unawakened pod person, he’d find A, B, and C. He never does it. It’s never confirmed. But of course he must be right. That’s… a crock, really. No one is that damn good.

One of the saving graces was Miles himself. I know I just bashed him a little up there, but ultimately as a narrator, he was clever and witty and fun to read. I found that I liked him as a person, and it made me root for him. In a story where the odds are against the heroes ever escaping, let alone winning, that’s all it takes to keep you reading to the end. Because, yeah, I wanted to see Miles and Becky make it out of there. With all its faults, which I consider mostly minor, it did that at least.

Also, in a related note, I watched the 1956 film adapted from the book. It was pretty close to the book’s events with some exceptions, including the ending. In some cases, it was quoting the book directly, which impressed me. The plot holes in the book were dealt with smoothly, as well. It was good (and short) if you want to try out some classic science fiction. I say this as someone who doesn’t watch a lot of older movies, but I can vouch for this one.

Final Rating

4/5
Show Less
LibraryThing member Gwendydd
Don't expect anything more from this book than you would expect from a b-movie: it's kindof campy, but it's a suspenseful page-turner. The thought of the people around you suddenly being replaced by identical duplicates is scary, in an insidious nightmare way, and the main characters handle
Show More
themselves very much like a lot of real people would.

There are some weaknesses. The main characters keep changing their minds about whether anything bad is happening or not, and while this is a realistic detail, Finney doesn't handle it very well. The middle of the book gets a little rambly while the characters are trying to decide what to do, and there are some scenes that just seem unnecessary. Becky, the main female character, is very poorly developed: she's just your typical pretty face, object of the narrator's desire, compliant and almost completely passive, except for one scene where she suddenly saves the day out of the blue. Entire scenes go by where she is in the room but doesn't say anything and lets the narrator make all her decisions for her.

But all in all, fun, suspenseful, and creepy. Classic b-movie material.

I listened to the audiobook, which was quite enjoyable (probably more enjoyable than reading the actual book would have been). It is read by the son of the movie director, which gives it a nice historical twist.
Show Less
LibraryThing member othersam
Contrary to what some people still say about this story, it’s not just a metaphor for encroaching ideologies (say, communism): it’s much more frightening than that. The Body Snatchers is about /fear of other people/ – specifically the sudden and nightmarish suspicion that everyone in the rest
Show More
of the world, even people you know, seems to have changed into something terrifying and inexplicable. Beneath the book’s period quirks lies a disembodied alien heart that still beats as powerfully as it did the day the book was first published. Cold, menacing, brilliant.
Show Less
LibraryThing member .Monkey.
I absolutely loved this book! I really cared about the characters (I especially loved Jack), and the suspense was expertly done - there were definitely lots of areas where I just couldn't put the book down until I knew how a certain scenario played out! It was just a great read all-around.
LibraryThing member Mary_Overton
This is a "revised and updated edition" published in 1978 to take advantage of the movie remake with Donald Sutherland. Colliers magazine published the original story, "The Body Snatchers," in 1954. I have not read it, but I am a huge fan of the 1956 movie with Kevin McCarthy -- have seen it so
Show More
many times that my visualizations as I read were in black and white. And despite the addition to the text of details like Jimmy Carter's presidency, this is a story soundly rooted in the 1950s. A fun read -- a reminder of how speeded up we have become -- in the book action scenes go on for pages & pages when they translate in seconds to the screen. That realization makes Finney's nostalgia for a peaceful, pre-WWI life even more poignant. How much faster can we get? People were asking that same question in 1954, the year I was born. Some surprises: Finney does a neat trick with a medical school skeleton, the reader gets more details about the pods and what happens to the bodies they replace, and the ending is a big surprise.

from pg. 114 "And there they lay, in the advancing, retreating waves of flickering red light: two enormous pods already burst open in one of two places, and I reached in with both hands, and tumbled them out onto the dirt. They were weightless as children's balloons, harsh and dry on my palms and fingers. At the feel of them on my skin, I lost my mind completely, and then I was trampling them, smashing and crushing them under my plunging feet and legs, not even knowing that I was uttering a sort of hoarse, meaningless cry -- "Unhh! Unhh! Unhh!" -- of fright and animal disgust. The wind had the flares twisting the flames till they sputtered and choked, and on the high cutaway embankment beside me, I saw a giant shadow -- mine -- squirming and dancing in a wild flickering, insane caper, the whole nightmare scene bathed in a made light the color of froth from a wound, and I think I came close to losing my mind."

and from pg 172
"'... the pods must fulfill their function, their reason for being.'
"'And what's their function?' I said sarcastically.
"Budlong shrugged. 'The function of all life, everywhere -- to survive.'"
Show Less
LibraryThing member DanaJean
I've seen the movies and the remakes and decided I needed to read the story. All the adaptations I have seen were pretty faithful to the book and I could see in my mind, Kevin McCarthy running through the streets trying to convince people that aliens had landed.

I listened to this as an audio book
Show More
and there was a nice little interview with the son of the director of the 1956 movie version. I enjoyed the story. Simple but effective.
Show Less
LibraryThing member ken1952
Those darned pod people. They certainly know how to ruin a perfectly good human being. This is one of my favorite sci fi/horror novels. Excellent chills. If you're a fan of any of the film versions then you need to read it. And to think we have Mr. Finney to also thank for one of the best time
Show More
travel novels Time and Again.
Show Less
LibraryThing member coloradogirl14
This book was made for a 1950's sci-fi movie - suburbian nostalgia, a handsome hero/heroine, a simple enemy, and a conclusion with just a touch more hope, optimism, and faith in the human spirit than we expect today. I really enjoyed this book, although I felt that the plot occasionally dragged
Show More
under the weight of too much straight exposition, and the climax went a little too easy on our heroes.

However, this was a creepy story, one that examines one of our most primal and terrifying fears - what happens when our bodies and our identities are violated. What I liked the most was the story's simplicity - there isn't a showdown with a flying saucer and little green men, there isn't a staggering body count, and there wasn't any dramatic explanation of WHY these seed pods came to Earth. As Miles Bennell warns us at the beginning of the story, "What you're starting to read is full of loose ends and unanswered questions." Normally, I like my stories to be wrapped up and satisfying, but in this case, the loose ends worked.
Show Less
LibraryThing member crazybatcow
I saw the 1978 version of this film when I was in my formative teen years. It scared the bejebus out of me. I have since seen both other versions of it (the original was too sedate and the remake had characters that were too bimbo-y).

This is the first time I've read the original story and I have to
Show More
say that I think I like it better than even my favorite film version.

The only negative thing I have to say about it is that it was a little bit moralizing - i.e. the "moral" of the story, hidden in alien effigies, was the withering-away of small town U.S.A. complete with people losing their humanity in the face of progress, etc... and it was none too subtle. I loved it as an alien-invasion end of the world type book, I didn't like it as a commentary on modernization.
Show Less
LibraryThing member comfypants
It's extremely corny, but it's a fun, fast-past corny. The conclusion is surprisingly good.
LibraryThing member martinhughharvey
Having read (audio) Time and Again by the same author and having enjoyed the movie versions I was keen to acquire and read this book. Glad I did - thoroughly enjoyable, quite spooky, and one can see the moralizing others report (but didn't strike me while reading it). One weak point is the deus ex
Show More
machina ending and how they survive - a bit war of the Worlds.

But a great book.
Show Less
LibraryThing member LaPhenix
Unexpectedly good. I expected the cliche cult classic, but was the surprised by the storytelling. I enjoyed the narrator, was impressed by the characters, and quite satisfied with the story overall.
LibraryThing member sgerbic
Really enjoyed it, though I found it pretty scary to read in bed each night. Saw the movie after-wards and I prefer the book and the ending.
LibraryThing member john257hopper
A marvellously haunting and really chilling story, this will be familiar to most through one or other of the film adaptations. The original book and film came out in the 1950s; the book is actually set in 1976, although the feel of the story does hark back to the decade in which was written. There
Show More
is more background explanation of the pods' origins and the process of transmutation here. The only slight disappointment is the ending, which is abrupt and much more upbeat than the frightening end of the 1956 film.
Show Less
LibraryThing member br14saal
The Body Snatchers by Jack Finney plunges the reader into a world full of alien adventures and battles, coupled with a suspenseful mystery where no one is safe. It will keep you enthralled from the very first page. Published in 1954, it has endured years of scrutiny and criticism, and has survived
Show More
to become a classic.

It starts with the introduction of the main character, Miles, who is a well-known doctor. When he gets a frantic call from a friend in the middle of the night, however, he soon realizes that what they are dealing with is nothing he was prepared for. Things turn from bad to worse as the whole town has been “snatched.” The only thing that they have left to rely on is their wits and their dwindling group of survivors; each other.

While the book had a good, although some what worn-out premise, there were many things about it that could have been improved. Though not uncommon for the time period it was written in, all the female characters (an astounding two) did was scream and faint. There was one scene where Becky “helped” Miles fight their guards, but the men did all the talking and planning. If the Bechdel test (a rule usually concerning movies) were to be applied to this book, it would have failed miserably. It even says at one point in the book; “As I believe with most wives, even the wisest, do with any real conviction held by their husbands, Theodora [a character in the book] accepted this and made it her own.” Not only are the women in the story overlooked and played to be nothing more than housewives, but there is a long dull point in the middle that will leave the reader wishing for a more interesting book to read. The promise of an excellent ending does nothing to help the boring intermission between the two “halves,” and if you do stick it out and read all the way through, it is a disappointment. Over all, I would recommend The Body Snatchers as a some-what inventive sci-fi read to people who enjoy slow and eerie, and not fast-paced and suspenseful novels. I would give it a three and a half stars out of five.
Show Less

Awards

Chesley Award (Nominee — 2016)

Language

Original language

English

Original publication date

1955

Physical description

119 p.; 17.8 cm

Local notes

Omslag: Kurt Caesar
Omslaget viser en mand, der bærer en bevidstløs kvinde
Indskannet omslag - N650U - 150 dpi
Fremtidsromanen, bind 9
Oversat fra engelsk "The Body Snatchers" af Knud E. Andersen
Omslaget er taget fra et italiensk Urania hæfte, nr 118, "Gli Invasati", dvs den italienske udgave
Der er en signatur på originalforsiden "Caesar" og Kurt Caesar (1906-1974) er en kendt illustrator af italienske og tyske science fiction magasiner. Den danske udgave har skåret tegningen, så man ikke kan se signaturen og tegneren er heller ikke krediteret i kolofonen.
Der er en signatur på forsiden "Caesar" og Kurt Caesar (1906-1974) er en kendt illustrator af italienske og tyske science fiction magasiner.

Side 135: Men ... byger af små frøer, diminutive fisk og mystiske småsten regner ug og da ned fra himlen. Her og der bliver mennesker brændt op inden i deres tøj uden nogen mulig forklaring, og nu og da bliver selve tidens velordnede og uforanderlige rækkefølge på ubegribelig vis forskudt og ændret. Man læser disse lejlighedsvis opdukkende historier i bladene, eller man hører vage, ubestemmelige rygter om dem. Men meget ved jeg: nogle af dem -- nogle af dem -- er absolut sande!

Other editions

Pages

119

Library's rating

Rating

½ (346 ratings; 3.8)

DDC/MDS

813.54
Page: 0.614 seconds