Du skal æde din næste

My first Burgess novel....what a ride! I admire his writing and immense and obscure vocabulary. The plot leaves something to be desired. As a a political satire it is brilliant and worthy of dissection and deep discussion. As a novel it's fragmented, meandering, and hard to really connect to the

Show More

characters. But if you can get over that, it's fun, amusing, very darkly comic, and completely unique.

Show Less

I've always viewed history as a kind of pendulum, and this book examines the swinging of a pendulum amazingly well. Overpopulation can have a huge impact on society. But so can governmental controls on personal liberties. And excellent addition to any dystopian reading list.

You know, I don’t read a lot of genre writing. I live, for better or for worse, in the Fiction section of the bookstore. Reading The Wanting Seed makes me think that I might have missed something. I’m not saying that this is a good book – I’m not sure that it is – but it’s the strangest

Show More

thing I’ve read in some time.
First off, there’s nothing quite as dated as the past’s future. Burgess describes a future where newscasts on vinyl LP’s are delivered daily and Britain uses a complicated pounds-and-shillings currency. The future’s not what it once was, I guess. There’s a lot of more familiar dystopian society stuff here – the planet in Burgess’s future is governed by three or four enormous, oppressive nanny states and is, per Malthus, quickly running out of food and room. Burgess’s classical education, which was noted in Jacks0n’s review, contributes to a story arc concerning a society’s shift from Apollonian to Dionysian values. Jacks0n praise for Burgess’s excellent vocabulary is also right on. The favorite new word I picked up from The Wanting Seed is, “plenilunar,” which means, “relating to the full moon.”
What sets this book apart, though, is the grotesque fun that Burgess seems to have with these subjects. Many citizens of the future have had their teeth removed and replaced with rubber dentures. Homosexuality is encouraged and childbearing discouraged, and Burgess turns many of his gay characters into unsubtle caricatures. The less said about the book’s frequent descriptions of enthusiastic cannibalism, the better. Let’s just say that Mr. Burgess made me consider vegetarianism for the first time in years. I can’t help thinking he’s trying to squick out his readers on purpose, and I’m sad to say that he’s rather good at it. Whether he’s being serious about the political and historical points he makes throughout the book is really anybody’s guess. Still, The Wanting Seed’s recommend to those who are looking for something a bit unusual.

Show Less

I read this about a week or two ago, but it's already fading in my memory.I guess the basic premise is that the world is overpopulated, so you're limited to how many children you can have. But polite, genteel people don't have any.Which has a knockoff effect of, if you're gay (particularly male and

Show More

gay) you advance more quickly in your career, and things like that. So there's a real advantage to pretending to be gay. And the culture has adopted gay dress and mannerisms. And that is really the most interesting and appealing part of the book, so it's a shame that this isn't dealt with much and is soon enough overthrown.Because limiting population goes against the natural order of things and society tries to restabilize itself with heterosexual orgies. And oh yea, cannibalism comes into play too.And you don't realize, or I didn't realize, right off that this is some sort of absurdist fiction. That I'm not meant to take it too seriously. Which can work, but sort of only if you also care about the characters. Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is silly, but.. you can feel for Arthur Dent and Ford Prefect is fun, and some of the other characters are fun and/or interesting. And in this book, just.. no, you can't really like them. Well, I can't like them.So the book is kind of interesting in an intellectual way, but I wouldn't call it particularly enjoyable on any other front.

Show Less

Part Brave New World, part 1984, with a dollop of Soylent Green. Not bad at all -- as usual, Burgess entertains.

Ugh - my husband insisted I read this & talked it up so much that I had a lot of trouble getting into it. So there it sits on the shelf...maybe after some time passes I can try to read it again.

I love Anthony Burgess, hes likely my favorite author. This is the third Burgess novel I've read and it definitely won't be the last. I think the wanting seed is on a weird level that is probably weirder than clockwork orange. Clockwork orange is actually not as weird as some may think, the main

Show More

weird thing about it is its language and well the crazy science stuff that they use to 'cure' Alex of his desire to commit crime. But the wanting seed is really really weird. The language is normal but the story is like D: HOW DID PEOPLE LET THE FUTURE GET THAT FUCKED UP??!?!! I was cool with the whole theres no god thing because well, God is too big a part of our government for no reason. But the weird denture thing? And the birth limit? And the food? WHAT THE JANK! I think for the first couple of chapters I sat with my eyebrow raised as I read the book thinking and probably speaking aloud something of that sentiment. But once I got into the book it was like any other Burgess book. A good read, an engaging story, funny moments, and some weird things that are both jacked up but believable within the premise of the story.

Show Less

This book has a bit of everything and then some...things that just have to be read to be appreciated.

Satirical novel set in a future England that is coming apart at the seams. The world is overpopulated and "it's sapiens to be homo" among other thing. We see the world collapse around the protagonists ears and come together again. This is a novel in which cannibalism is funny.

Last month I reread Anthony Burgess's most famous novel, A Clockwork Orange. In it I found new insights into Burgess's creative thought, encouraging me to read more of his oeuvre. I followed up on that idea with The Wanting Seed, which he wrote immediately following Clockwork. This dystopian novel

Show More

demonstrates one of his persistent themes, the conflict between 'Augustinian' authoritarianism and 'neo-Pelagian' liberalism. The novel is set in a future similar to A Clockwork Orange, where Burgess projects an England in which Christianity, fertility, and heterosexuality will have been outlawed. His heroine, Beatrice-Joanna, is a dissident earth-mother who runs away to Wales to give birth in the home of her brother-in-law. Her husband, Tristram, is a history teacher who, in an early scene in the novel, explains the history and meaning of pelphase (Pelagianism) and gusphase (Augustinianism), while his brother heads the Ministry of Infertility. The brothers' relationship leads Tristram to think, “If you expect the worst from a person you can never be disappointed.”  Using an almost over-the-top comic style Burgess comments on themes including: the tyranny of the state, homosexuality, perpetual war, spontaneous orgies, the persistence of religious feeling, and cannibalism. After his escape from prison Tristram hitches a ride from a sort of local militia-man who comments:  "There doesn't seem to be a government at the moment, but we're trying to improvise some kind of regional law and order. . . We can't have all this, indiscriminate cannibalism and the drains out of order.  We've got our wives and children to think of." (pp 171-2)  Although the setting of the novel demonstrates the worst aspects of pelagian liberalism and addresses many societal issues, the primary subject is overpopulation and its relation to culture.

The novel is inventive with a comic seriousness that is humorous with periodic moments of unease; the line between the comic and the serious is sometimes blurred. The author's signature fecundity of ideas, his love of quotations and literary allusions, and his brilliant use of language carries the reader through the rough spots. However, it is not hard to understand why it was "considered too daring" by potential backers of Carlo Ponti's proposed film version. My admiration for Burgess as a novelist of ideas grows with each of his novels. This comically heretical entry, combines with its predecessor to provide a veritable one-two punch of dystopian delight.

Show Less

Loved this book. Hilarious and energetic. Comes at you like a psychedelic rock song. I found the story pretty clever but really loved Burgess' sense of apocalypse, as if he transcribed images from Bosch's Garden of Earthly Delights. I loved Tristram's trek thru degenerating England, the slow sprawl

Show More

of history, moving from extreme police states on opposite poles of the structure.


Yes, the love story was clumsy, but t served the purpose of showing this world's dichotomy and hypocrisy, his wife leaving him for a fake gay man, being cursed in either worlds for asking questions and being against the establishment no matter who is in charge. The final payoff of the book wasn't as great as the sum of its parts.
|

An amazing hallucinatory romp through what could be called social commentary, the main purpose of The Wanting Seed is to examine the ebb and flow of political life, how the world seems to veer from one set of rules, of justifications, to the next. The plot is nothing special, but Burgess creates such a skewed and hilarious world of cannibalistic spiritualism, forced sexuality, contrived war that the novel's other flaws are only minor stumbling blocks. He achieves this satire by having his world try to re-create the doings of the past---most hilariously by staging wars to create jobs and keep the population in check.

But where the novel really succeeds is representing how each authoritarian figure in the novel grasps almost mindlessly at the next perfect doctrine for controlling the world, be it a general whose only understanding of war is through old movies and the War Poets (a man of many famous first lines) or Tristram's brother, who callously jumps onto each new moral ideal, going from a leader in the INFERTILITY POLICE, needing to hide his illegitimate children in fear of being arrested, to a higher-up in the FERTILITY POLICE, now using those same bastard children as a method of advancing his career.


A wondrous, but flawed, novel. You truly get a sense of this sprawling world, and the journey chapters are very effective.

Think A Modest Proposal on bad Acid.

Show Less

A dystopic satire set in a future in which an overbearing government tries to deal with horrendous population growth. The government obsesses about whether it can feed the vast population. As a means of doing so doctor's hasten the deaths of the sick whose copses are turned into fertilizer. As in

Show More

China, fertile couples are allowed only one child. London has grown so wildly that it has reached its south and east-most shores. It can only grow north and west now. Soon it will swallow Wales and Scotland.

Show Less

Burgess found a way to solve the problems of our world. No more innocent animals need to be tortured for food. WTG Burgess, my kind of author.

The racism, homophobia, and sexism kept on jarring me out of the story. I just couldn’t finish it. The two stars is for the basic underlying plot. There are some interesting ideas in this book, but I’m sure they can be found in other sci-fi dystopian novels that aren’t as *ahem* problematic.