Status
Available
Call number
Library's review
Indeholder kapitlerne "Preface to the Paperback Edition", "1. The Rise of the Rest", "2. The Cup Runneth Over", "3. A Non-Western World?", "4. The Challenger", "5. The Ally", "6. American Power", "7. American Purpose", "Notes", "Acknowledgments", "Index".
Indeholder "Preface to the Paperback
"Preface to the Paperback Edition" handler om at velstandsstigningen efter anden verdenskrig og den amerikanske centralbanks vellykkede kamp mod inflation gav en fornemmelse af at risiko generelt og ikke bare den politiske risiko var aftaget. Det gav masser af risikovillig kapital, der gerne gik ind i subprime boliglån til næsten samme rente som amerikanske statsobligationer. Den fejl blev straffet, for økonomien er som verdens hurtigste racerbil og der er ingen, der ved hvordan man reelt styrer den. Amerika låner i Kina og de to lande er bundet til hinanden for amerikansk vækst er bygget på kinesiske lån og kineserne kan ikke anbringe deres handelsoverskud bedre end i amerikanske obligationer. USA skylder i 2008 10 * 10^12 dollars væk i statsgæld og Kina har 2 * 10^12 dollar i dollargældsbeviser. Her i 2017 er amerikansk statsgæld ved at nå 20 * 10^12 dollar.
"1. The Rise of the Rest" handler om Vestens opblomstring i 1400-tallet og frem, USA's fremkomst, vækst og dominans og hvordan resten af verden er på vej med på vognen.
"2. The Cup Runneth Over" handler om at på trods af krig og ufred, så går det godt.
"3. A Non-Western World?" handler om at Kina fra 1430 til ca 1830 vendte verden ryggen og aktivt fjernede muligheden for opdagelsesrejser. Det er en helt anden måde at tænke på end vi er vant til i Vesten.
"4. The Challenger" handler om Kina, der holder en lidt lav profil, men på grund af størrelsen alligevel har store effekter på omverdenens politik og økonomi. Kina vil bare vokse og ypper ikke kiv eller gør opmærksom på sig selv.
"5. The Ally" handler om Indien, der har oplevet en kraftig økonomisk vækst, så de kan holde på deres egne talenter. Det er selvforstærkende.
"6. American Power" handler om Storbritanniens fald fra tinderne. 22. juni 1897 var Diamond Jubilee for Dronning Victorias kroning. Dvs 60 års dagen og den blev behørigt fejret. Blot 2 år senere startede Boerkrigen. England vandt krigen, men tabte alle deres venner undervejs. Første verdenskrig ruinerede England. Faktisk toppede England i årene 1845-1870, hvor deres 2% af verdensbefolkning sad på 30 procent af det samlede bruttonationalprodukt og 40 procent af tekstilhandelen. USA sidder på flæsket nu og demografi og uddannelsessystem hjælper til at holde dem der, i alt fald i forhold til EU. Men det er lidt farligt at være på toppen, fx er amerikanere vænnet til at de ikke behøver at lære sprog. Men når nu alle andre i verden, har amerikansk som andetsprog og desuden har et meget stort lokalt marked?
"7. American Purpose" handler om en slags forpligtelse til at løse udenrigspolitiske problemer, fx mellem Marokko og Spanien i Gibraltar, selv om USA objektivt set kunne være ligeglad. 9/11 angrebene den 11 september 2001 viste klart at USA har evnen til at gribe ind globalt. Men er de bedre end Romerriget eller Det Britiske Emperium til at holde sig ved magten?
"Notes" er ca 15 henvisninger pr kapitel til baggrundsmateriale
"Acknowledgments" handler om hvem der har hjulpet.
"Index" er et ret omfattende opslagsregister. Meget nyttigt.
Verden er ikke farlig. Det ser bare sådan ud på tv. Terrorangreb er små og økonomien bliver ikke skadet af dem. Terror virker ikke, når folk ikke bliver bange. Forfatteren kigger på Kina og Indien, og ja, det kan være at de løber i samme problemer som Japan, men det vil vare længe. Hyperinflation er værre end recession, for det udrydder alle værdier. Heldigvis har vi stort set kun Zimbabwe som eksempel for tiden.
Forfatteren er inder og har blik for at USA tidligere, når det gjorde trælse ting i udlandet, faktisk bød de samme udlændinge velkommen til USA, hvor de blev værdifulde borgere i det amerikanske samfund. Men er det mon nu ved at ændre sig?
Forfatterens tese er at USA er en supermagt, nu den eneste og at det nok vil fortsætte. Lidt sjovt (og skræmmende) at læse efter Trump og Brexit har skudt noget af globaliseringseuforien ned. Han hylder globalisering og frihandel, og nævner stort set ikke klima og miljø.
Indeholder "Preface to the Paperback
Show More
Edition", " The Fastest Race Car in the World", " The Problem of Debt", " Hurtling Toward the Post-American World", " All Hang Together", "1. The Rise of the Rest", "2. The Cup Runneth Over", " The Islamic Threat", " The Great Expansion", " The Three Forces: Politics, Economics and Technology", " The Problems of Plenty", " The Rise of Nationalism", " The Last Superpower", "3. A Non-Western World?", " Strength is Weakness", " Is Culture Destiny?", " The Spoils of Victory", " Westernization", " Modernization", " The Death of the Old Order", " The Mixed-up Future", "4. The Challenger", " Central Planning That Works?", " Hiding Its Lights", " Good and Foreign Policy", " Too Big to Hide", " The Dragon and the Eagle", "5. The Ally", " Bottoms Up", " The Necessity for Government", " Blind and Toothless", " The Eagle and the Cow", " The Hindu Worldview", " Nuclear Power", " A Geographic Expression", "6. American Power", " Britain's Reach", " Britain's Descent", " The Strange Rise of British Power", " Good Politics. Bad Economics", " America's Long Run", " The Future Is Here", " America's Best Industry", " Learning to Think", " America's Secret Weapon", " The Macro Picture", " Everyone Is Playing the Game", " A Do-nothing Politics", "7. American Purpose", " The Virtues of Competition", " This Time It's Different", " New Rules for a New Age", " 1. Choose", " 2. Build broad rules, not narrow interests", " 3. Be Bismarck not Britain", " 4. Order à la carte", " 5. Think asymmetrically", " 6. Legitimacy is power", " Fear and Loathing", "Notes", "Acknowledgments", "Index"."Preface to the Paperback Edition" handler om at velstandsstigningen efter anden verdenskrig og den amerikanske centralbanks vellykkede kamp mod inflation gav en fornemmelse af at risiko generelt og ikke bare den politiske risiko var aftaget. Det gav masser af risikovillig kapital, der gerne gik ind i subprime boliglån til næsten samme rente som amerikanske statsobligationer. Den fejl blev straffet, for økonomien er som verdens hurtigste racerbil og der er ingen, der ved hvordan man reelt styrer den. Amerika låner i Kina og de to lande er bundet til hinanden for amerikansk vækst er bygget på kinesiske lån og kineserne kan ikke anbringe deres handelsoverskud bedre end i amerikanske obligationer. USA skylder i 2008 10 * 10^12 dollars væk i statsgæld og Kina har 2 * 10^12 dollar i dollargældsbeviser. Her i 2017 er amerikansk statsgæld ved at nå 20 * 10^12 dollar.
"1. The Rise of the Rest" handler om Vestens opblomstring i 1400-tallet og frem, USA's fremkomst, vækst og dominans og hvordan resten af verden er på vej med på vognen.
"2. The Cup Runneth Over" handler om at på trods af krig og ufred, så går det godt.
"3. A Non-Western World?" handler om at Kina fra 1430 til ca 1830 vendte verden ryggen og aktivt fjernede muligheden for opdagelsesrejser. Det er en helt anden måde at tænke på end vi er vant til i Vesten.
"4. The Challenger" handler om Kina, der holder en lidt lav profil, men på grund af størrelsen alligevel har store effekter på omverdenens politik og økonomi. Kina vil bare vokse og ypper ikke kiv eller gør opmærksom på sig selv.
"5. The Ally" handler om Indien, der har oplevet en kraftig økonomisk vækst, så de kan holde på deres egne talenter. Det er selvforstærkende.
"6. American Power" handler om Storbritanniens fald fra tinderne. 22. juni 1897 var Diamond Jubilee for Dronning Victorias kroning. Dvs 60 års dagen og den blev behørigt fejret. Blot 2 år senere startede Boerkrigen. England vandt krigen, men tabte alle deres venner undervejs. Første verdenskrig ruinerede England. Faktisk toppede England i årene 1845-1870, hvor deres 2% af verdensbefolkning sad på 30 procent af det samlede bruttonationalprodukt og 40 procent af tekstilhandelen. USA sidder på flæsket nu og demografi og uddannelsessystem hjælper til at holde dem der, i alt fald i forhold til EU. Men det er lidt farligt at være på toppen, fx er amerikanere vænnet til at de ikke behøver at lære sprog. Men når nu alle andre i verden, har amerikansk som andetsprog og desuden har et meget stort lokalt marked?
"7. American Purpose" handler om en slags forpligtelse til at løse udenrigspolitiske problemer, fx mellem Marokko og Spanien i Gibraltar, selv om USA objektivt set kunne være ligeglad. 9/11 angrebene den 11 september 2001 viste klart at USA har evnen til at gribe ind globalt. Men er de bedre end Romerriget eller Det Britiske Emperium til at holde sig ved magten?
"Notes" er ca 15 henvisninger pr kapitel til baggrundsmateriale
"Acknowledgments" handler om hvem der har hjulpet.
"Index" er et ret omfattende opslagsregister. Meget nyttigt.
Verden er ikke farlig. Det ser bare sådan ud på tv. Terrorangreb er små og økonomien bliver ikke skadet af dem. Terror virker ikke, når folk ikke bliver bange. Forfatteren kigger på Kina og Indien, og ja, det kan være at de løber i samme problemer som Japan, men det vil vare længe. Hyperinflation er værre end recession, for det udrydder alle værdier. Heldigvis har vi stort set kun Zimbabwe som eksempel for tiden.
Forfatteren er inder og har blik for at USA tidligere, når det gjorde trælse ting i udlandet, faktisk bød de samme udlændinge velkommen til USA, hvor de blev værdifulde borgere i det amerikanske samfund. Men er det mon nu ved at ændre sig?
Forfatterens tese er at USA er en supermagt, nu den eneste og at det nok vil fortsætte. Lidt sjovt (og skræmmende) at læse efter Trump og Brexit har skudt noget af globaliseringseuforien ned. Han hylder globalisering og frihandel, og nævner stort set ikke klima og miljø.
Show Less
Genres
Publication
Penguin (2009), Paperback, 336 pages
Description
The author of the bestselling "The Future of Freedom" describes a world in which the U.S. will no longer dominate the global economy. He sees the "rise of the rest" as the great story of our time, and one that will reshape the world.
Media reviews
maybe it takes a Bombay-born immigrant like Zakaria, who went from Yale to Harvard (where we were colleagues) and to the top of Newsweek International, to remind this faltering giant of its unique and enduring strengths. America will be in trouble only when China becomes home to tomorrow’s hungry
Show More
masses yearning to be free — and to make it.
Show Less
User reviews
LibraryThing member bruchu
Rise of the Rest
It's truly unfortunate that Fareed Zakaria chose to name his book, "Post American World", because it does not accurately reflect his central thesis which is the "rise of the rest" and not the end of American exceptionalism. I'm sure the provocative title was more sensational than he
In any case, this short book is a terrific survey of 20th century developments specifically leading to the globalization phenomenon that has led to economic miracles occuring in both China and India. I say survey, because Zakaria does not intend the book to be a complete treatise on the subject, but rather to present a concise overview of the major themes and most importantly offer his prognosis for the future.
According to Zakaria, the "post american world" is one where the balance of power has readjusted after the temporary imbalance post cold-war which gave the US sole superpower status for over a decade. In summing up Zakaria's vision of this new relationship he states that "there is now a conversation with the Americans in the room, and one without, the key point being that a conversation now exists with or without the Americans."
Some reviewers have been overly critical of Zakaria for his somewhat apologetic view especially towards China, given its atrocious human rights record, continued oppression of Tibet, complete disregard for the natural environment and exploitation of resources from developing countries. It is true that Zakaria fails to highlight any of these critical issues, however, all of that still does not detract whatsoever from his central argument that China is rapidly rising and will soon out-produce the US in a few decades despite the human costs.
Zakaria's writing style is clear, uncluttered, and straightforward. In my opinion, "Post American World" is one of the more important non-fiction books of the year.
It's truly unfortunate that Fareed Zakaria chose to name his book, "Post American World", because it does not accurately reflect his central thesis which is the "rise of the rest" and not the end of American exceptionalism. I'm sure the provocative title was more sensational than he
Show More
wanted it to be but that his publisher thought it would attract more "buzz".In any case, this short book is a terrific survey of 20th century developments specifically leading to the globalization phenomenon that has led to economic miracles occuring in both China and India. I say survey, because Zakaria does not intend the book to be a complete treatise on the subject, but rather to present a concise overview of the major themes and most importantly offer his prognosis for the future.
According to Zakaria, the "post american world" is one where the balance of power has readjusted after the temporary imbalance post cold-war which gave the US sole superpower status for over a decade. In summing up Zakaria's vision of this new relationship he states that "there is now a conversation with the Americans in the room, and one without, the key point being that a conversation now exists with or without the Americans."
Some reviewers have been overly critical of Zakaria for his somewhat apologetic view especially towards China, given its atrocious human rights record, continued oppression of Tibet, complete disregard for the natural environment and exploitation of resources from developing countries. It is true that Zakaria fails to highlight any of these critical issues, however, all of that still does not detract whatsoever from his central argument that China is rapidly rising and will soon out-produce the US in a few decades despite the human costs.
Zakaria's writing style is clear, uncluttered, and straightforward. In my opinion, "Post American World" is one of the more important non-fiction books of the year.
Show Less
LibraryThing member markleon
Fareed Zakaria argues that the "rise of the rest" as he calls the new state of affairs in the world is not something that the United States should fear. He believes that the US will continue to be the only true super-power in the world, but that the world will now become multi-polar.
Zakaria makes
Zakaria also takes on the political sclerosis of the US, identifying continued partisanship and unwillingness to compromise as making it impossible to accomplish anything even on seemingly simple problems like energy policy. The problem is that he has no prescriptions for resolution.
Zakaria makes his best points when discussing how the US will need to conduct foreign policy in this post-American world. Obviously, the go-it-alone policy of the current administration has been completely discredited. So, Zakaria looks forward to a more realpolitik view again, where we do what is in the best interests of the US, while simultaneously working cooperatively with our allies so that they will see that the power of the US is nothing to fear. For me, the best line of the book was relegated to a footnote where Zakaria noted that foreign policy was best viewed as a matter of gains and losses and not of theology (paraphrase).
Zakaria makes
Show More
good points on the economic influence of the US. Unfortunately for him, his book suffers from bad timing as the current economic problems in the US make fear of globalism stoke even higher.Zakaria also takes on the political sclerosis of the US, identifying continued partisanship and unwillingness to compromise as making it impossible to accomplish anything even on seemingly simple problems like energy policy. The problem is that he has no prescriptions for resolution.
Zakaria makes his best points when discussing how the US will need to conduct foreign policy in this post-American world. Obviously, the go-it-alone policy of the current administration has been completely discredited. So, Zakaria looks forward to a more realpolitik view again, where we do what is in the best interests of the US, while simultaneously working cooperatively with our allies so that they will see that the power of the US is nothing to fear. For me, the best line of the book was relegated to a footnote where Zakaria noted that foreign policy was best viewed as a matter of gains and losses and not of theology (paraphrase).
Show Less
LibraryThing member GoofyOcean110
Sweeping with broad strokes and brilliant yet easy to read prose, Fareed Zakaria clearly establishes himself among the giants of foreign relations, politics, and economics. With this book, Zakaria outlines the 'Rise of the Rest' - that is how the rest of the world has caught up to America in many
Whether Democrat or Republican, American or not, this book has an important message of global change which means that no one and no country can rest easy in this day and age of a 'flattened' world with a more level playing field and shifting geopolitical and economic realities. An important and relevant book, even though the hardback came out before the mortgage crisis, global economic meltdown and 2008 American election. Highly worth reading and positively recommended.
Show More
important ways. This presents both large opportunities and challenges that America must face in the present, in addition to the challenges of terrorism, and foreign and domestic issues. He argues that things are not as dire as they look, in terms of America's world standing in technology, education, and military and political capital, but that the world is shifting, geopolitically, economically, technologically, socially, and that to maintain relevance and learn from global powers and struggles of the past such as the British and Roman Empires and the Cold War, priorities must be set since the USA cannot do everything everywhere all the time, sole global superpower or not. Whether Democrat or Republican, American or not, this book has an important message of global change which means that no one and no country can rest easy in this day and age of a 'flattened' world with a more level playing field and shifting geopolitical and economic realities. An important and relevant book, even though the hardback came out before the mortgage crisis, global economic meltdown and 2008 American election. Highly worth reading and positively recommended.
Show Less
LibraryThing member AMson
I'll refrain from going into a point by point analysis of this book. I think anyone interested in Fareed Zakaria or his writings will know what they're getting into.
Nonetheless, Zakaria does a very commendable job of laying out how this globalized world we now inhabit has and will shape foreign
The U.S. will be the most affected by this landscape because countries like China, Russia, Brazil, and Ind...more I'll refrain from going into a point by point analysis of this book. I think anyone interested in Fareed Zakaria or his writings will know what they're getting into.
Nonetheless, Zakaria does a very commendable job of laying out how this globalized world we now inhabit has and will shape foreign policy, economics, social, and other diplomatic relationships across the globe.
The U.S. will be the most affected by this landscape because countries like China, Russia, Brazil, and India (among many others) are taking advantage of globalization, modernity, industrialization, and political failings to become strong players on a global/ international stage.
The real insight in this book comes from Zakaria's intimate knowledge of how the rest of the world perceives the U.S- and what options and strategies are most likely to keep the U.S. a legitimate power in a world where the "rest" are strengthening and becoming more and more relevant.
He writes about India and China in a way that unveils a great appeal for their culture, governments (sometimes), religions, and political philosophies. Some of his anecdotes, stats, and insights actually make the U.S. seem more stagnant, shortsighted, weak, quarrelsome, and at times backwards that I already perceived us to be.
I'd recommend this book to anyone interested in U.S foreign policy, globalized politics, and general foreign relations. It's a great telling of how the next decade will play out, and the pitfalls that await if caution, pragmatism, and multilateralism donn't become the pillars of U.S. foreign policy.
Nonetheless, Zakaria does a very commendable job of laying out how this globalized world we now inhabit has and will shape foreign
Show More
policy, economics, social, and other diplomatic relationships across the globe.The U.S. will be the most affected by this landscape because countries like China, Russia, Brazil, and Ind...more I'll refrain from going into a point by point analysis of this book. I think anyone interested in Fareed Zakaria or his writings will know what they're getting into.
Nonetheless, Zakaria does a very commendable job of laying out how this globalized world we now inhabit has and will shape foreign policy, economics, social, and other diplomatic relationships across the globe.
The U.S. will be the most affected by this landscape because countries like China, Russia, Brazil, and India (among many others) are taking advantage of globalization, modernity, industrialization, and political failings to become strong players on a global/ international stage.
The real insight in this book comes from Zakaria's intimate knowledge of how the rest of the world perceives the U.S- and what options and strategies are most likely to keep the U.S. a legitimate power in a world where the "rest" are strengthening and becoming more and more relevant.
He writes about India and China in a way that unveils a great appeal for their culture, governments (sometimes), religions, and political philosophies. Some of his anecdotes, stats, and insights actually make the U.S. seem more stagnant, shortsighted, weak, quarrelsome, and at times backwards that I already perceived us to be.
I'd recommend this book to anyone interested in U.S foreign policy, globalized politics, and general foreign relations. It's a great telling of how the next decade will play out, and the pitfalls that await if caution, pragmatism, and multilateralism donn't become the pillars of U.S. foreign policy.
Show Less
LibraryThing member yeremenko
One of the best, balanced looks at America's and its place in the world.
Zakaria explains, with exhaustive factual examples and data, the changes in the world's economy. I question one reviewer on this site that says there are few facts, the book at times has too many facts. In one example he shows
Besides current details about China, India and 'the rise of the rest" Zakaria provides historical explanations to support his statements. I am still amazed anyone could say this book does not support its declarations.
Much of the book is not what Americans, especially fear-mongering righties want to read. American needs to cooperate and be the hub of world activity, not a dictator.
It is also prescient that in 2007 he worried the democratic party is losing Bill Clinton's connection to commerce and economic sensibilities.
This book shoots down the middle. It rightfully shows how damaging the "unipolar" bullying of Bush and Cheney has been but also shows how wrong leftist views of America's decline are off base.
Zakaria explains, with exhaustive factual examples and data, the changes in the world's economy. I question one reviewer on this site that says there are few facts, the book at times has too many facts. In one example he shows
Show More
Americas position atop the education ladder despite the dire reports in the media. He does this by showing facts and the data. He does not present the misleading, out of context facts most of the media love.Besides current details about China, India and 'the rise of the rest" Zakaria provides historical explanations to support his statements. I am still amazed anyone could say this book does not support its declarations.
Much of the book is not what Americans, especially fear-mongering righties want to read. American needs to cooperate and be the hub of world activity, not a dictator.
It is also prescient that in 2007 he worried the democratic party is losing Bill Clinton's connection to commerce and economic sensibilities.
This book shoots down the middle. It rightfully shows how damaging the "unipolar" bullying of Bush and Cheney has been but also shows how wrong leftist views of America's decline are off base.
Show Less
LibraryThing member ctorstens
Saw a conservative email going around which showed Obama with this book, and how it proved he was out to destroy America... Had to read it.
LibraryThing member Clif
The book title suggests that perhaps it's predicting the demise of America. But instead the book is generally optimistic about the future and predicts that other nations will rise in importance relative to the U.S. However, America will continue to be a global player on the international scene.
This book was published in May 2008 prior to the recent meltdown in the financial world. I found myself speculating about what the author would say differently if the book were written after the current flury of bailouts and the collapse of Lehman Brothers. On page 205 the author says, "New derivatives based on underlying instruments like stock or interst-rate payment are increasingly important ..." He goes on to say that the London financial exchanges sell more derivatives than the New York exchanges with the implication that this is an indication of the strength of the London markets. In think the author would want to word things a little differently today if he had a chance. But still it is my guess that the author would view current conditions as part of expected cycles in the world's economy.
The book covers some of the same ground covered by Friedman's The World Is Flat. Both books spend considerable time discussing the rise of China and India on the world scene. Zakaria's writing is perhaps a bit more subduded and business like than Friedman's book (and perhaps less interesting to read as a result).
I found the parts of the book that are critical of the United States to be the most interesting parts. The following is a quotation from the book I found interesting: "More people will graduate in the United States in 2006 with sports-exercise degrees than electrical-engineering degrees," says General Electric's CEO, Jeffrey Immelt. "So if we want to be the massage capital of the world, we're well on our way."
The book maintains that the American educational sytem is better than many think. Worldwide testing always shows the students from Singapore with top scores in math and science. So Americans might conclude that our schools should be more like theirs. It is interesting to see from the following quotation from the book what the educational officials in Singapore think of the American educational system: "Tharman Shanmugaratnam, until recently Singapore's minister of education, explains the difference between his country's system and America's. "We both have meritocracies," Shanmugaratnam says. "Yours is a talent meritocracy, ours is an exam meritocracy. We know how to train people to take exams. You know how to use people's talents to the fullest. Both are important, but there are some parts of the intellect that we are not able to test well - like creativity, curiosity, a sense of adventure, ambition. Most of all, America has a culture of learning that challenges conventional wisdom, even if it means challenging authority. These are the areas where Singapore must learn from America.""
Read in December, 2008
Show More
This book was published in May 2008 prior to the recent meltdown in the financial world. I found myself speculating about what the author would say differently if the book were written after the current flury of bailouts and the collapse of Lehman Brothers. On page 205 the author says, "New derivatives based on underlying instruments like stock or interst-rate payment are increasingly important ..." He goes on to say that the London financial exchanges sell more derivatives than the New York exchanges with the implication that this is an indication of the strength of the London markets. In think the author would want to word things a little differently today if he had a chance. But still it is my guess that the author would view current conditions as part of expected cycles in the world's economy.
The book covers some of the same ground covered by Friedman's The World Is Flat. Both books spend considerable time discussing the rise of China and India on the world scene. Zakaria's writing is perhaps a bit more subduded and business like than Friedman's book (and perhaps less interesting to read as a result).
I found the parts of the book that are critical of the United States to be the most interesting parts. The following is a quotation from the book I found interesting: "More people will graduate in the United States in 2006 with sports-exercise degrees than electrical-engineering degrees," says General Electric's CEO, Jeffrey Immelt. "So if we want to be the massage capital of the world, we're well on our way."
The book maintains that the American educational sytem is better than many think. Worldwide testing always shows the students from Singapore with top scores in math and science. So Americans might conclude that our schools should be more like theirs. It is interesting to see from the following quotation from the book what the educational officials in Singapore think of the American educational system: "Tharman Shanmugaratnam, until recently Singapore's minister of education, explains the difference between his country's system and America's. "We both have meritocracies," Shanmugaratnam says. "Yours is a talent meritocracy, ours is an exam meritocracy. We know how to train people to take exams. You know how to use people's talents to the fullest. Both are important, but there are some parts of the intellect that we are not able to test well - like creativity, curiosity, a sense of adventure, ambition. Most of all, America has a culture of learning that challenges conventional wisdom, even if it means challenging authority. These are the areas where Singapore must learn from America.""
Read in December, 2008
Show Less
LibraryThing member bodhisattva
Almost exactly 400 years ago, Galileo looked through his telescope at the moons of Jupiter revolving around that planet, and realized that Earth could not possibly be at the center of the universe. He was visited by the Inquisition 2 years later for his trouble. Fareed Zakaria is now making the
Zakaria discusses not the "demise" of the U.S., but rather the "rise of everyone else". His global-centered perspective is crucial for an understanding of 21st century international relations, politics, and economics.
Show More
same observation about the role of Washington and the U.S. in world affairs: international politics and economics no longer revolves around America. The Inquisition awaits.Zakaria discusses not the "demise" of the U.S., but rather the "rise of everyone else". His global-centered perspective is crucial for an understanding of 21st century international relations, politics, and economics.
Show Less
LibraryThing member ccatwood
Very little data used to substantiate the declarative statements promulgated here.
LibraryThing member AramisSciant
Interesting (though not very fresh nor original) take on globalization and the role of the US in the future of economics.
LibraryThing member fpagan
The undoubtedly insightful Zakaria may be the victim of very unlucky timing in writing this book just before the financial panic of 2008. Yes, the "rise of the rest" will be important for shaping the world order of the next few decades. But, now that we know *all* the dire effects of George W
Show More
Shrubbish's reign of error, can we still hope that an absolute decline of the US will not also loom large? Show Less
LibraryThing member Darrol
Excellent book. Patriotic in just the right way, confident in America's potential to be a positive force, even as other countries thrive and emerge.
LibraryThing member fidchivers
A fascinating, quick read which argues that America must ready itself for no longer being the dominant player in world affairs - not because of American decline, but due to the inevitable rise of the rest fo the world. He argues persuasively that not only will this happen, but it is already well on
The one drawback is also a strenght. He does not delve as deeply into many matters as would like, but this is so the whole argument can proceed forward mroe quickly and gracefully. The book is aimed more at the casual (but intelligent) reader, rather than the world scholar.
Show More
its way to being a reality. To me, it seems an obvious argument, but many do not seem to think so. Zakaria brings in the facts to buttress his observations and instincts, and puts it all together in a coherent, well reasoned presentation. The one drawback is also a strenght. He does not delve as deeply into many matters as would like, but this is so the whole argument can proceed forward mroe quickly and gracefully. The book is aimed more at the casual (but intelligent) reader, rather than the world scholar.
Show Less
LibraryThing member mojomomma
This was a great book and in its way, very comforting and uplifting. The author argues that Americans have spooked themselves into a posture of fear about the rest of the world. Actually, our world has rarely been more peaceful and prosperous than it is now. Why the fear? Media and politics share
Show More
the blame. While our politics is failing us, economically the US is diverse and strong. Zakaria says we need to rethink our place in the world order. While we are still the most powerful nation, we must improve our image overseas and share some of the power with our allies to insure world peace. We should not see rising powers India and China as threats to our power, but work to accomodate them into the world power structure. A major theme is that America is not sinking, the developing world is rising. Show Less
LibraryThing member bferster
A surprisingly uplifting and hopeful book about the end of the American Empire. Zakaria presents lost of data to refute some "common sense" notions about things, although he seems to take a heavy enconomic slant to things.
LibraryThing member pescatello
Amazing book. A must read for anyone who cares about the world
LibraryThing member judiparadis
Lots of similarities to Thomas Friedman's The World is Flat as he explains what is likely to happen in the coming century as other nations "catch up" to the US in their ability to produce goods, educate their people, and in general, assume a more first world lifestyle. Particular attention is paid
Show More
to China and India. He has lots of interesting predictions and commentary, some of it encouraging about the place of America in the world. He also cautions us about how best to maintain the respect of other nations. Show Less
LibraryThing member Asata
Excellent, incisive insight into current state of the world. Maybe not correct in all elements, but worth reading.
LibraryThing member Schmerguls
This is a 2008 book, and the only reason I do not give it five stars is that so much has happened since it was written that it is not as curent as I wish it would be. The author says much which makes good sense and shows that many of the loud voices now speaking on foreign affairs do not make such.
Show More
His stricturres on the George W. Bush administratioon resonate with good sense. The book is clearly written and its points are well-reasoned. Show Less
LibraryThing member buffalogr
Thought I'd like this more than I did. It's not at all about the title...it's about American globalization and how the USA can succeed in the changing world economy. This book came out early in 2008 so it must have been written in 2007; it's dated. The book reads like a series of thoughts, not
Show More
necessarily stuck together. In the end, he doesn't say much...just blather. I did not toss it--read it to the end. But, should have given up after just a few chapters. Glad it came from the library and I did not pay for it. Show Less
LibraryThing member GShuk
Great book with a positive view of a Post-American world. Insightful history of how policy and decisions of other supper powers affected their rise and fall. He allowed me to see the US from the developing worlds point of view and how the developing world sees each other.
LibraryThing member raschneid
Didn't read all of it, but it was a good introduction to the impact of globalization on world politics.
LibraryThing member stampfle
This is an excellent book with a few very minor flaws, but if a reader had only time for a quick read he/she would do well to turn to the chapter called "American Purpose" and read Zakaria's six simple guidelines for what operating in the "new world" would look like. He suggests that America:
1.
2. Build broad rules, not narrow interests.
3. Be Bismarck not Britain.
4. Order a la carte.
5. Think asymmetrically; and realize
6. Legitimacy is power.
His explanation of each of these guidelines is thought provoking.
The greatest weakness of the book comes in the final pages as he uses his own experience of coming to America in 1982 to convince the reader that 'openness' may be America's greatest strength. I was not convinced.
Our US Presidential candidates should take time to read this important analysis of America's flawed foreign policy and economic weaknesses. They and their Vice Presidential candidates would do well to consider how they intend to face the challenges and lead America back to a position of strength as a reliable and legitimate world power.
It is a pity that this book was not available as a text book for Ms. Condoleezza Rice, whose foreign policy and State Department seem to have been diametrically opposed to every reasonable position advocated by Zakaria in his excellent book.
1.
Show More
Choose. 2. Build broad rules, not narrow interests.
3. Be Bismarck not Britain.
4. Order a la carte.
5. Think asymmetrically; and realize
6. Legitimacy is power.
His explanation of each of these guidelines is thought provoking.
The greatest weakness of the book comes in the final pages as he uses his own experience of coming to America in 1982 to convince the reader that 'openness' may be America's greatest strength. I was not convinced.
Our US Presidential candidates should take time to read this important analysis of America's flawed foreign policy and economic weaknesses. They and their Vice Presidential candidates would do well to consider how they intend to face the challenges and lead America back to a position of strength as a reliable and legitimate world power.
It is a pity that this book was not available as a text book for Ms. Condoleezza Rice, whose foreign policy and State Department seem to have been diametrically opposed to every reasonable position advocated by Zakaria in his excellent book.
Show Less
LibraryThing member MarthaJeanne
It is interesting reading this in 2017 with the hindsight of three presidential elections and the 2008 economic crisis. In the end, I think most of Zakaria's conclusions hold up well, although some of the economic ones require updating. My rating would be higher if It weren't dated in several
Show More
places. Show Less
LibraryThing member danoomistmatiste
This one I must say was almost unputdownable.
In this book, the theme is the rise of the rest. He focuses on the emerging powers, China and India. Past failed powers such as Great Britain and why that empire collapsed the way it did and also a detailed examination of the American systems in the
More than the content of the book is his style of writing which I find to be very idiomatic and free flowing.
In this book, the theme is the rise of the rest. He focuses on the emerging powers, China and India. Past failed powers such as Great Britain and why that empire collapsed the way it did and also a detailed examination of the American systems in the
Show More
realms of Finance, Politics, Education and Foreign Policy, which makes for some very interesting reading.More than the content of the book is his style of writing which I find to be very idiomatic and free flowing.
Show Less
Subjects
Awards
Lionel Gelber Prize (Shortlist — 2009)
Publishers Weekly's Best Books of the Year (Nonfiction — 2008)
The New York Times Notable Books of the Year (Nonfiction — 2008)
Christian Science Monitor Best Book (Nonfiction — 2008)
Language
Original language
English
Original publication date
2008
Physical description
336 p.; 19.6 cm
ISBN
0141038055 / 9780141038056
Local notes
Omslag: Keenan
Omslaget viser en alternativ udgave af det amerikanske flag
Indskannet omslag - N650U - 150 dpi
PostAmerican
Side 34: In many countries outside the Western world, there is pentup frustration with having had to accept an entirely Western or American narrative of world history -- one in which they either are miscast or remain bit players. Russians have long chafed at the standard narrative about World War II, in which Britain and the United States heroically defeat the forces of fascist Germany and Japan. Given mainstream U.S. historical accounts, from Stephen Ambrose to Ken Burns, Americans could be forgiven for believing that Russia played a minor part in the decisive battles against Hitler and Tojo. In fact, the eastern front was the central arena of World War II. It involved more land combat than all other theaters of the war put together and resulted in thirty million deaths. It was where three-quarters of all German forces fought and where Germany incurred 70 percent of its casualties. The European front was in many ways a sideshow, but in the West it is treated as the main event.
Side 35: Stalin's war.
Side 115: The crucial point here is that, throughout history, great powers have seen themselves as having the best intentions but being forced by necessity to act to protect their ever-expanding interests. And as the world's number two country, China will expand its interests substantially.
Side 115: In the messy world of international politics, intentions and outcomes are not directly linked. (No country was expecting a world war in 1914.) It's like a market in which all companies are trying to maximize profits by raising prices: the systemwide result is exactly the opposite -- a fall in prices. Similarly, in international politics, another system with no single, supreme authority, the intentions of countries do not always accurately predict the outcome. Hence the Roman aphorism "If you want peace, prepare for war."
Side 127: "The goal for China is not conflict but the avoidance of conflict," he writes. "True success in strategic issues involves manipulating a situation so effectively that the outcome is inevitably in favor of Chinese interests. This emerges from the oldest Chinese strategic thinker, Sun Zi, who argued that 'every battle is won or lost before it is ever fought.'
Side 159: The nuclear nonproliferation regime has always tempered idealism with a healthy dose of realism. The United States, after all, goes around the world telling countries that a few more nuclear warheads are dangerous and immoral — while holding on to thousands of nuclear weapons of its own.
Omslaget viser en alternativ udgave af det amerikanske flag
Indskannet omslag - N650U - 150 dpi
PostAmerican
Side 34: In many countries outside the Western world, there is pentup frustration with having had to accept an entirely Western or American narrative of world history -- one in which they either are miscast or remain bit players. Russians have long chafed at the standard narrative about World War II, in which Britain and the United States heroically defeat the forces of fascist Germany and Japan. Given mainstream U.S. historical accounts, from Stephen Ambrose to Ken Burns, Americans could be forgiven for believing that Russia played a minor part in the decisive battles against Hitler and Tojo. In fact, the eastern front was the central arena of World War II. It involved more land combat than all other theaters of the war put together and resulted in thirty million deaths. It was where three-quarters of all German forces fought and where Germany incurred 70 percent of its casualties. The European front was in many ways a sideshow, but in the West it is treated as the main event.
Side 35: Stalin's war.
Side 115: The crucial point here is that, throughout history, great powers have seen themselves as having the best intentions but being forced by necessity to act to protect their ever-expanding interests. And as the world's number two country, China will expand its interests substantially.
Side 115: In the messy world of international politics, intentions and outcomes are not directly linked. (No country was expecting a world war in 1914.) It's like a market in which all companies are trying to maximize profits by raising prices: the systemwide result is exactly the opposite -- a fall in prices. Similarly, in international politics, another system with no single, supreme authority, the intentions of countries do not always accurately predict the outcome. Hence the Roman aphorism "If you want peace, prepare for war."
Side 127: "The goal for China is not conflict but the avoidance of conflict," he writes. "True success in strategic issues involves manipulating a situation so effectively that the outcome is inevitably in favor of Chinese interests. This emerges from the oldest Chinese strategic thinker, Sun Zi, who argued that 'every battle is won or lost before it is ever fought.'
Side 159: The nuclear nonproliferation regime has always tempered idealism with a healthy dose of realism. The United States, after all, goes around the world telling countries that a few more nuclear warheads are dangerous and immoral — while holding on to thousands of nuclear weapons of its own.
Pages
336
DDC/MDS
| 303.49 |