Collection
Genres
Publication
Description
It's murder in Discworld! -- which ordinarily is no big deal. But what bothers Watch Commander Sir Sam Vimes is that the unusual deaths of three elderly Ankh-Morporkians do not bear the clean, efficient marks of the Assassins' Guild. An apparent lack of any motive is also quite troubling. All Vimes has are some tracks of white clay and more of those bothersome "clue" things that only serve to muck up an investigation. The anger of a fearful populace is already being dangerously channeled toward the city's small community of golems -- the mindless, absurdly industrious creatures of baked clay who can occasionally be found toiling in the city's factories. And certain highly placed personages are using the unrest as an excuse to resurrect a monarchy -- which would be bad enough even if the "king" they were grooming wasn't as empty-headed as your typical animated pottery.… (more)
Language
Original language
Media reviews
User reviews
In Feet of Clay, the City Watch discovers to murders
Honestly, my biggest problem with Feet of Clay is that it feels like it retreads a lot of familiar ground from Men at Arms. Let’s see, someone trying to depose Vetinari and reinstate the monarchy? I’ve seen that twice already.
The best thing about Feet of Clay is the introduction of Cheri, a dwarf who’s the forensic analyst and who wants to be openly female. For a while in the series now, Pratchett has had the idea of all dwarfs looking and presenting as male, but this is the first time he starts exploring that idea.
“You can be any sex you like provided you act male. There’s no men and women in the Watch, just a bunch of lads.”
I also really enjoy Cheri’s friendship with Angua. While I love Angua, she was pretty much the only female character in Men at Arms, but in Feet of Clay her friendship with Cheri is an important subplot.
Feet of Clay also touches on class issues – Vimes has to deal with his class identity and being married to the richest noblewoman in the city.
“And, while it was regarded as pretty good evidence of criminality to be living in a slum, for some reason owning a whole street of them merely got you invited to the very best social occasions.”
I continue to love Vimes. His strange mixture of cynicism and idealism is very compelling.
"The common people?” said Vimes. “They’re nothing special. They’re no different from the rich and powerful except they’ve got no money or power. But the law should be there to balance things up a bit. So I suppose I’ve got to be on their side.”
Anyway, I would recommend Feet of Clay to people who are a fan of the Ankh-Morpork city watch books.
Originally posted on The Illustrated Page.
Although Vetinari the patrician is the most sucessful of Ankh-Morpork's ruler sin ensuring what the populace want is what happens (ie that tomorrow is much like today) for some the grass is always greener on the other side, and
This is a fairly typical of an early Pratchett book, although with less puns than some. There are many subplots that weave about before coming to some form of linked conclusion. However there is yet to develop that sophisticated deeper layer of caustic commentry on a topical issue that the later books so expertly manage. As always when Vime sis the star one of the key themes is discrimination - gender and race are pretty much equal in Ankh Morpock, because it's a man's world there. There a re a few brief lines devoted to politics and hereditary social status as well at the end a sly dig at religion: Dorfl the ceramic and fireproof athiest will debate the meaning of life in his spare time, but only with the priest of the most worthy god. An absolutely classic Pratchett line.
I liked it, as it features my favourite character, Carrot but it is not as funny as some other books in the series (like e.g. Guards! Guards!).
It features golems, witch makes this book interesting, though the readers do not get a chance to "see into their
I would recommend this book to fans of the Night Watch, or the Disworld fans who would like to read all the books, but this is not a good starting point, its just not funny enough or does not have concepts deep enough to pull the uninitiated Pratchett reader into reading all the books they can get their hands on.
Feet of Clay doesn't seem to parody or satire anything specifically, near as I can tell, though it does have a general theme of police procedurals and mysteries, as usual with the Watch. The other themes coming into play here are golems, nobility and the tracking of descent (again, something that has appeared before in the Watch books thanks to Carrot), and also a lot about hidden or heretofore unknown identities - Angua the werewolf, Cheery Littlebottom the female dwarf, Corporal C. W. St. J. Nobbs the (possibly) Earl...
Overall, I found the book to be tightly written with a good pace. Too many of the early Discworld books got tedious or boring about 4/5 of the way through, though the last few I've read (going in publication order) were much better about it, and this book didn't have the problem hardly at all. In fact, where it did start to get to where I wanted to skip pages, the tedium cleared itself up in a matter of paragraphs.
A very entertaining part of the Discworld City Watch series.
This is one of my favourite Discworld novels, and has my favourite wordplay joke, the one about people demanding "the right to arm bears".
The humour is there – and Pratchett is famed for it – for all to see, and so that is probably one thing we can overlook easily enough, despite being for many people what makes his works enjoyable.
What made them enjoyable was also how well put together they were. Ideas that you
The ten dollar word for this is theme.
Playing with this can have a lot of effects. The one Pratchett seems to enjoy the most is irony. This irony can turn the discovering moment of who-dun-its (an essential moment for that genre that has become boring from over use) into something a little more wonderful. Some modern writers have tried to jazz up this moment by riddling their plots with pretzel twists. Pratchett does not do much to cover up his tracks in this respect, he just makes you enjoy those moments more.
Pratchett has found a game he plays well. But if you play with this further and further eventually you may be ‘accused of literature’ – as Pratchett has.
[book: Feet of Clay] is my first foray into the delights of Pratchett's Discworld series, and it surely won't be the last. In a chart of all the books I found on a website, it's listed as a "whodunnit," and this is true, but it is much more besides.
The book takes place in Ankh-Morpork, the major city of Discworld, where Sir Samuel Vimes, Commander of the Watch, and his force of humans, dwarves, trolls, a werewolf and a gargoyle, are dealing with two major problems. Two old men have been murdered -- the curator of a dwarf bread museum (dwarves make weapons-grade bread) and a priest. Something off is going on with the city's golems, which may relate to the murders. And, there is the matter of the ruler of the city. Since Sir Samuel's ancestor, Old Stoneface, executed the last King, the city has been loosely ruled by a succession of Patricians. The current one, Lord Vetinari, is being poisoned. That much is obvious, but how? Why? And by whom? These questions aren't so easy to answer.
While it is a fine mystery story, Feet of Clay also has things to say about diversity, monarchy, and being true to one's essential nature. Pratchett lards his story with tossed-off allusions and humorous footnotes. Each creature has its own way of speaking, consistent with its nature (I particularly like the trolls). I found this book an excellent introduction to Discworld and will be visiting that fantastic place again soon.
In this Discworld edition, Pratchett returns to our stalwart policing crew, The Watch, who become embroiled in a series of
Of course, with murders come clues and they were ... well, to be fair, some were a little odd at first. Vague enough to actually have me wondering
Though I enjoyed it, I’ve two niggles about this one. Firstly there’s the descriptions of the heralds themselves. I got all muddled in having three (or was it four?) being described one after the other. Maybe it was due to the late night I read that particular piece. Even so, thank goodness there’s a page in the front with the pictures.
Secondly it’s Angua. More precisely her insistence that something must eventually go wrong with her relationship and she’ll have to leave. So she always seemed all geared up to go. I never feel settled enough in the character to fully enjoy reading some her scenes. She just rubs me the wrong way.
Definitely one of the weaker
'But getting a grip would mean there would have to be a long, bottomless moment when he was not exactly holding on to the roof and not exactly holding on to the drainpipe and in very serious peril of holding on to the ground.'
'Commander, I always used to consider that you had a definite anti-authoritarian streak in you.'
'Sir?'
'It seems you have managed to retain this even though you are Authority.'
'Sir?'
'That's practically Zen!'