Status
Available
Call number
Publication
Del Rey Books (1980), 186 pages
Description
"A mindbender of a book, and a treat for Zelazny fans."--ALA BOOKLIST. The Road runs from the unimaginable past to the far future, and those who travel it have access to the turnoffs leading to all times and places-even to the alternate time-streams of histories that never happened. Why the Dragons of Bel'kwinith made the Road--or who they are--no one knows. But the Road has always been there and for those who know how to find it, it always will be!
Media reviews
NBD / Biblion
De tijd is een autosnelweg, compleet met afritten en motels, waarop een vrijbuiter Dorakeen eeuwig op weg is. Een oude makker hangt gevaar boven het hoofd, maar pas op het allerlaatst blijkt de onafwendbare dood een overgang naar een andere bestaansvorm te betekenen. Een prachtige bizarre omgeving,
Show More
prima uitgewerkt, een complexe intrige met verrassende wendingen, veel plezierige intrigerende karakters... een van de betere amusementsromans van Zelazny in het vreemde SF-idioom.
(NBD|Biblion recensie, Annemarie Kindt) Show Less
User reviews
LibraryThing member endersreads
This out of print Zelazny novel is a little jade gem!
I have not read yet Baudelaire or Whitman, though I have been eying "Flowers of Evil" for some time now. I will enjoy it all the more because of the cybernetic Flowers.
I loved almost everything about this book—the cigar and pipe smoking, the
I was fascinated to learn that Zelazny had shuffled the "Two" chapters and inserted them randomly in the "One" chapters, even if the publisher had him later sort out a couple.
I certainly will be looking forward to reading more Roger Zelazny in the future.
I have not read yet Baudelaire or Whitman, though I have been eying "Flowers of Evil" for some time now. I will enjoy it all the more because of the cybernetic Flowers.
I loved almost everything about this book—the cigar and pipe smoking, the
Show More
way the chapters fell under either a One or Two, the travel upon the road of time, the memorable characters, the famous "guest characters" (Hitler, de Sade, Doc Savage, an ancient Sumerian, a crusader), the idea of a black decade and the ensuing flavorful assassins... The only things that I did not care for too much were Reyd's son Randy—in his quest for his daddy, and the ending of the book. It felt rushed and not thought out very well compared to the rest of the novel. I was fascinated to learn that Zelazny had shuffled the "Two" chapters and inserted them randomly in the "One" chapters, even if the publisher had him later sort out a couple.
I certainly will be looking forward to reading more Roger Zelazny in the future.
Show Less
LibraryThing member jimmaclachlan
Another novel done in a very unique way. The book is broken into chapters (I & II) which are really time lines Of Red, the hero, & the rest of the cast, respectively. The few who can travel 'the road' through time & various realities. Supposedly, Zelazny wrote both sections linearly & then tossed
Show More
the #2 chapters into the air & stuck them in between chapter 1 sections in random fashion. It makes the time flow really work. Interesting characters are met along the way. Some are quite recognizable, others less so. Some time investigating them is worthwhile. Nothing ever seems to be quite what you think. The plot isn't very complex, although it is somewhat convoluted & the style typically understated. Another long, strange trip...Fantastic. Well worth the re-read. As usual, now that I know the story, I can spend more time recognizing subtle clues, puns & obscure references. It's not as much of a treasure hunt as "Lonesome October", but it has its moments. Show Less
LibraryThing member TCWriter
I found Roadmarks to be one of Zelazny's least-interesting books; the whole premise was unclear enough (as were the main character's motivations) that I read it, and - unlike so many other Zelazny books - never picked it up again.
Not his best.
Not his best.
LibraryThing member DinadansFriend
This seems to me that RZ has taken a side-trip into R.A. Lafferty country for this one. A time travel story, sort-of, that begins as a revenge Western and doesn't go farther, really.
LibraryThing member antao
(Original Review, 1980)
I am confused, perhaps someone can explain this apparent error to me: (See pg 147 (Del Rey edition)): Randy and Leila are talking at a bar with "Leaves of Grass" (the book/microprocessor) on the table. However, Zelazny appears to get confused and bring "Flowers of Evil" (the
Roger Zelazny's recent novel "Roadmarks" is a somewhat retread of "Nine Princes in Amber". Here again we have a Road of Mystery that only a few can travel. This time it leads forward and backward in time rather than to alternate universes. We have a hero who longs to return to a place that he cannot remember, and we have random people trying to kill him. The difference is that "Nine Princes In Amber" did eventually supply motives and answers to its characters and "Roadmarks" does not. No reason is ever given for the hero's old friend to try to kill him or to stop trying to kill him once they meet up. No explanation is ever given of what the hero is doing trundling up and down the Road, and even he doesn't seem to know. At first you think that he's trying to recreate the circumstances that lead to America, since he dresses like a truck driver and keeps trying to smuggle guns to the Greeks so they can win at Marathon, but later you find that the Road runs right past Cleveland. Sure, maybe he'll tie it all together in a later book, but that's no excuse for making the first installment as incomplete as this. I also thought that "The Changeling", his last book, was a skimpy piece of work (though it didn't help that it was only a novella padded out with illustrations), so maybe Zelazny's mind just isn't in it any more.
I can also look at it through a different perspective. Although somewhat related to the Amber series, the style of writing is very different. In Amber, Zelazny described everything, presented everything, left very little to the imagination. This makes the books seem very rich but is ultimately disastrous. By the third book or so, the setting completely overwhelms any character development or plot, everything gets terribly involved, and when the series finally ends it's a sort of euthanasia. The Amber series is incredibly topheavy. In “Roadmarks”, on the other hand, Zelazny seems to be reacting to the sort of writing mess he got himself into in Amber. Oh sure, there's a Road, and travellers on it, and so forth, but the style has become much more spare. Zelazny is leaving much more to the imagination. He doesn't tell what it is that the protagonist is seeking: the important thing is that he's seeking something. By leaving out the background it becomes possible to tell a story comparable to Amber in one book instead of half a dozen. It doesn't work all that well, overall, but it's occasionally brilliant. The Amber series is better than “Roadmarks”, but “Roadmarks” is better than the nth member of the Amber series.
[2018 EDIT: This review was written at the time as I was running my own personal BBS server. Much of the language of this and other reviews written in 1980 reflect a very particular kind of language: what I call now in retrospect a “BBS language”.]
I am confused, perhaps someone can explain this apparent error to me: (See pg 147 (Del Rey edition)): Randy and Leila are talking at a bar with "Leaves of Grass" (the book/microprocessor) on the table. However, Zelazny appears to get confused and bring "Flowers of Evil" (the
Show More
other book/mp in the story) into the scene from out of nowhere and then it just as mysteriously leaves the scene; "Flowers said..." Am I confused or is Zelazny? “Roadmarks” is a pretty confusing book and so I can easily imagine having missed a scene someplace.Roger Zelazny's recent novel "Roadmarks" is a somewhat retread of "Nine Princes in Amber". Here again we have a Road of Mystery that only a few can travel. This time it leads forward and backward in time rather than to alternate universes. We have a hero who longs to return to a place that he cannot remember, and we have random people trying to kill him. The difference is that "Nine Princes In Amber" did eventually supply motives and answers to its characters and "Roadmarks" does not. No reason is ever given for the hero's old friend to try to kill him or to stop trying to kill him once they meet up. No explanation is ever given of what the hero is doing trundling up and down the Road, and even he doesn't seem to know. At first you think that he's trying to recreate the circumstances that lead to America, since he dresses like a truck driver and keeps trying to smuggle guns to the Greeks so they can win at Marathon, but later you find that the Road runs right past Cleveland. Sure, maybe he'll tie it all together in a later book, but that's no excuse for making the first installment as incomplete as this. I also thought that "The Changeling", his last book, was a skimpy piece of work (though it didn't help that it was only a novella padded out with illustrations), so maybe Zelazny's mind just isn't in it any more.
I can also look at it through a different perspective. Although somewhat related to the Amber series, the style of writing is very different. In Amber, Zelazny described everything, presented everything, left very little to the imagination. This makes the books seem very rich but is ultimately disastrous. By the third book or so, the setting completely overwhelms any character development or plot, everything gets terribly involved, and when the series finally ends it's a sort of euthanasia. The Amber series is incredibly topheavy. In “Roadmarks”, on the other hand, Zelazny seems to be reacting to the sort of writing mess he got himself into in Amber. Oh sure, there's a Road, and travellers on it, and so forth, but the style has become much more spare. Zelazny is leaving much more to the imagination. He doesn't tell what it is that the protagonist is seeking: the important thing is that he's seeking something. By leaving out the background it becomes possible to tell a story comparable to Amber in one book instead of half a dozen. It doesn't work all that well, overall, but it's occasionally brilliant. The Amber series is better than “Roadmarks”, but “Roadmarks” is better than the nth member of the Amber series.
[2018 EDIT: This review was written at the time as I was running my own personal BBS server. Much of the language of this and other reviews written in 1980 reflect a very particular kind of language: what I call now in retrospect a “BBS language”.]
Show Less
LibraryThing member nadineeg
Very enjoyable time travel tale with hitmen, humour, and some very cool characters.
LibraryThing member fuzzi
Pure Zelazny: a story that keeps you guessing until the end. I found myself turning back a chapter or two several times during my read to clarify, and even started reading it again once I'd finished. Definitely recommended for fans of this author, and for those who want something that challenges
Show More
the reader. Show Less
LibraryThing member AQsReviews
I loved banging down the Road in a beater truck that is also a Transformer when it gets the aid of Baudelaire’s “Alexa” device. I totally loved the books qua A.I., in other words. I also think this is one of the better time-manipulation stories because a Road with exits and on-ramps that
Fritz Leiber’s The Big Time (1961) does it better. And Douglas Adam’s The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (1979) does, too. No, those are not the same as Roadmarks, but I would hands down give those five stars. For all its interesting quirkiness, Roadmarks is fairly empty. Readers should read this novel so they know what the heck the rest of us are talking about.
Show More
relate, in some way, to history is fantastic.Fritz Leiber’s The Big Time (1961) does it better. And Douglas Adam’s The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (1979) does, too. No, those are not the same as Roadmarks, but I would hands down give those five stars. For all its interesting quirkiness, Roadmarks is fairly empty. Readers should read this novel so they know what the heck the rest of us are talking about.
Show Less
LibraryThing member bragan
I'm slowly making my way through a big stack of old Roger Zelazny SF paperbacks I picked up at a library sale a while back. This one I'm pretty sure I'd actually read before, probably decades ago when I was in high school, but I remembered almost nothing about it.
It's an odd one, though, even for
This does not work perfectly, but it does work better than you might expect. (I do also suspect it works best if you read the whole thing in something like one sitting -- it's less than 200 pages and not a very dense read, so that's entirely possible, but, alas, I did not do it that way.) There is ultimately something rather slight about it, and depending on how you tilt your head, it can all seem either pretty cool or utterly ridiculous. It was, in any case, a reasonably entertaining reading experience, though.
Rating: I cannot for the life of me figure out how to rate this. I'm going to call it 3.5/5, but I feel like it almost deserves an extra half star just for its sheer audacity.
It's an odd one, though, even for
Show More
Zelazny. The basic premise is pretty nifty: there is a road that stretches through time, with entrances and exits at various centuries (ones that sometimes change if history is altered enough), and people who know how to find it can travel that road in cars or trucks or horse-drawn carriages or chariots. An imaginative enough conceit, but the structure and the various weird events in the story take it beyond that, to... well, I don't know what. The blurb on the back cover describes it as having a "kaleidoscopic treatment of time, character, and action," and that's probably the best possible description of it. It really does feel like you're looking at the story through a kaleidoscope. Short chapters show us glimpses of various people at various times without a great deal of context. It does all sort of add up to a full story, one focused on a man who drives up and down the road in his pickup truck searching for something, and on the people who are currently trying to kill him, but it does so in a weird, fragmented way that never quite lets you get your bearings very well, often while throwing some very wild images at you. (The Marquis de Sade riding a mind-controlled tyrannosaur, anyone?) This does not work perfectly, but it does work better than you might expect. (I do also suspect it works best if you read the whole thing in something like one sitting -- it's less than 200 pages and not a very dense read, so that's entirely possible, but, alas, I did not do it that way.) There is ultimately something rather slight about it, and depending on how you tilt your head, it can all seem either pretty cool or utterly ridiculous. It was, in any case, a reasonably entertaining reading experience, though.
Rating: I cannot for the life of me figure out how to rate this. I'm going to call it 3.5/5, but I feel like it almost deserves an extra half star just for its sheer audacity.
Show Less
Subjects
Awards
Kurd Laßwitz Preis (Nominat — 2024)
Language
Original language
English
Original publication date
1979-10
ISBN
0345253884 / 9780345253880