Status
Call number
Genres
Collection
Publication
Description
Suspense. Thriller. Young Adult Fiction. Young Adult Literature. HTML:"A brilliant, twisty thriller�I loved it!" �KAREN M. MCMANUS, bestselling author of One of Us is Lying From the author of We Were Liars, which John Green called "utterly unforgettable," comes a mind-bending, New York Times bestselling thriller told in reverse. "Compulsively readable." �Entertainment Weekly "An addictive and shocking feminist thriller." �Lena Dunham Imogen lives at the Playa Grande Resort in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. She spends her days working out in the hotel gym and telling other guests how she was forced out of Stanford. But Imogen isn't really Imogen. She's Jule. And she's on the run from something. Or someone. Which means . . . where is the real Imogen? Rewind: Jule and Imogen are the closest of friends. Obsessed with each other, even. Imogen is an orphan, an heiress; she and Jule spend a summer together in a house on Martha's Vineyard, sharing secrets they'd never reveal to another soul. But that was months ago. Where is Immie now? And why is Jule using her name? "You will devour it." �Gayle Forman, bestselling author of If I Stay"Fans of E. Lockhart's We Were Liars will love this . . . and definitely won't see the ending coming." �HelloGiggles.com "Tangled secrets, diabolical lies and, ultimately, a mind-blowing outcome are crafted with the plotted precision we expect (and love!) from E. Lockhart." �Justine Magazine "Moves at a breakneck speed." �Marie Claire "As with E. Lockhart's previous novel, the best-selling "We Were Liars," [readers] will likely finish the last page and flip right back to the beginning to search for clues they missed." �Chicago Tribune.… (more)
User reviews
This fast-paced and well-crafted thriller is perfect for fans of Bond, Bourne, and Catch Me If You Can . Some things I saw coming, while others were a complete surprise. I'm not sure I completely buy the ending, but my quibbles are not serious enough to discourage you from reading it. If you liked We Were Liars, I think it's safe to say that you'll like this one, too.
Otherwise, although well-written and fast-moving, it borrows so much from a certain Highsmith novel that it is somewhat lacking in suspense. The
Overall though, like its anti-heroine, the book lacked a really convincing identity of its own.
Lockhart starts her book with the ending. Jule is alone in a Baja resort, enjoying life - doing whatever she want when she wants. Then a woman appears, asking Jule about herself. Jule
And it is that last question that drives the book.
"If only she could go back in time, Jule felt, she would be a better person. Or a different person. She would be more herself. Or maybe less herself. She didn't know which, because she didn't any longer know what shape her own self was, or whether there was really no Jule at all, bu only a series of selves she presented for different contexts. Were all people like that, with no true self? Or was it only Jule?"
Lockhart's timeline as I mentioned, starts with the ending and weaves it way back to the beginning. I was curious to find out about Imogen. Who is she and why is Jule pretending to be her? Who is Jule really? Initially I was quite intrigued, but as the book progressed, I found myself growing somewhat bored with Jule's repetitive deceptions. What is truth and what is fiction are inextricably intertwined. I also found myself predicting what the beginning (end) would reveal. Turns out I was right - and slightly disappointed. I think I was perhaps expecting a twist such as the one in We Were Liars.
I found the timeline used a bit confusing. But it did mirror Jule's mind. Lockhart's descriptions of that mind's inner workings were quite chilling....
"Her mind was cinematic. She looked superb in the light from the streetlamps. After the fight, her cheeks were flushed. Bruises were forming underneath her clothes, but her hair looked excellent. And oh, her clothes were so very flattering. Yes, it was true that she was criminally violent. Brutal, even. But that was her job and she was uniquely qualified for it, so it was sexy."
Genuine Fraud echoes some actual cases and some other mystery works of fiction - The Talented Mr. Ripley comes to mind. But at the end Genuine Fraud was just an okay read for me.
Loved it! It is told backwards a la Megan Miranda's "All the Missing Girls" and it really works.
This is the tale of Imogen. And Jule. Who may be who they say they are. Or maybe not. Who you may be able to trust. Or maybe not.
Once this book gets
Unfortunately, this book takes quite a while to get going. I found it slow moving and very confusing in the beginning, and the confusion did not abate as much as I would have liked as the story progressed. The idea of a story being told backwards is a very clever one, but the way Lockhart handles it makes for a lot of flipping back and forth trying to figure out what is going on.
I had such high hopes for this book, because I loved We Were Liars. That's the reason I kept reading, but this was not the followup from Lockhart I was so hoping for. The last half of the book bumps the rating up to 3 stars for me, but I wouldn't blame people who didn't keep reading past the first half.
This was a mystery, suspense that had so many twists and turns it was impossible to guess what would happen next. And it
A very different book. Definitely worth the read!
So was I?
Yes..ish
Ok so hear me out, this book had a lot of unique characteristics that once I got used to, I really enjoyed. The story of Jule is told...backwards.
Weird right?
So the book opens with Chapter 19; Jule is in a posh resort in Mexico and is obviously hiding out (from what/who? we don't know) and has been "made" by a detective. She flees the resort, hiding out in the slums of Mexico, trying to figure out her next move. Each chapter takes us back a few weeks, each chapter ending up where the previous one has begun. Are you following me? So the mystery of the novel is figuring out the "where it all went wrong" because it's very obvious, something is terribly wrong. Jule is a chameleon, you're never really sure what you're getting with her, or where her story will end up taking you. Jules backstory definitely took a much different turn than I was anticipating. If a Singe White Female storyline is your jam- I think you would find this entertaining. I will say it would not have been nearly as entertaining if read backwards to forwards- the whole point of the mystery would have been lost.
Overall I would recommend this one, it was a very unique reading/storytelling experience. The mystery was intriguing, kept me riveted and eager for more. There is no neat, wrapped nicely with a bow ending, (So if you are the kind of reader who needs everything finished up and over by the end, this one isn't for you) but was satisfying and fitting.
EDITED: Okay. I just knocked a star off because I've now had time to think about the plot and it is so wildly implausible.
I do like it when YA authors experiment with structure and plotting, so to see that it started at the end was a great way to start this book. We start with Jule, who has taken on the identity of her best friend Imogen, a flighty heiress who was as aimless as she was charming. We don’t know what happened to Imogen, only that she is dead, and Jule is pretending to be her. Just as it seems she’s about to be arrested for some sort of crime (fraud? something worse?), we go backwards in time. And then we go further backwards. As we go back more and more, the pieces start to come into place, not only about who Jule is, who Imogen was, how they found each other, and how everything went wrong… plus the collateral damage along the way. We kind of get a sense for Jule and who she is, but she is definitely the definition of unreliable. Things that are said about her may not be the truth, and certainly things she tells other people probably aren’t. The backwards structure was a really neat way to get some of the facts, foreshadowing to events that happened before the moment that you are reading about. You forge thoughts and attitudes towards characters, but then as you shift backwards through the story your attitude changes and you see them in completely new ways. The more I see this device, the more I come to appreciate it, to be sure. It also made it so that I had a hard time putting this book down, needing to take any down time to keep going to find out what happened. It was such a fast and engrossing read that I consumed most of it in one sitting, and then stayed up probably far too late, battling sleep, just to see how it all turned out. There is no denying that the pacing and the little smattering of clues throughout the pages made this a very fun read.
But the problem that I had with it is that it is most certainly borrowing a lot from “The Talented Mr. Ripley”. I’m sure that it’s meant to be an homage to this classic story of obsessive friendship, identity theft, and murder, but there were a number of parallels that felt more like lifting plot points instead of honoring them. The close friend who has always been suspicious of the interloper. The lover who is being played like a harp. The parent who reaches out because their child has ditched responsibility in favor of carelessness. An incident in a boat with an OAR (my God, this basically played out the same way in “Ripley” as it did here). The list goes on. For the target audience, that isn’t going to really make much of a difference. For them Imogen won’t be Dickie Greenleaf and Jule won’t be Tom Ripley, but in my mind I couldn’t separate the characters in this book from the ones that they appear to be modeled after. I think that perhaps if it had been made a bit more clear that this was, in fact, a genderbent retelling with a different structure I would have been more thrilled by it, but instead it was frustrating because I would always be thinking ‘well that was just what Highsmith did’.
All that said, it’s undeniable that “Genuine Fraud” was an entertaining read. Definitely the kind of book that will keep you guessing and keep you completely obsessed with it. I would be curious to see if Lockhart will be following it up with other stories about Jule. After all, since this is an homage to Tom Ripley, it’s important to note that he had a whole series dedicated to him and his exploits. I’d probably read more about Jule, just as I’ve always meant to with regards to Tom Ripley.
The premise and the writing are both solid and I love the Memento-like way the book is written. The characters, while unlikable, are compelling and realistic. All huge checks in the positives column. I feel like this is the perfect easy read to sit down with and read on the beach or by a snowy window (which is where I've been reading it) and can easily be tackled in a weekend.
The issues I have arise during the concluding third of the novel. The biggest problem with writing a book in flashback is that you already know the twists and major plot points for the most part, so all of the lead up material that you'd typically read at the beginning of the novel is now at the end and it has to be impeccable. Otherwise, you end up feeling confused and let down by the initial catalyst and character motivations.
With every chapter that I counted down, I expected to come across some great revelation that explained exactly why things had happened as they did, but that revelation never really came. Or, at least, it didn't come in a way that gave me a real "a-ha" moment. And since I don't think this novel would have worked as well if it had been told in your typical chronological order, I can only say that, for me, Genuine Fraud felt sort of like, well, a fraud. Or, as the old phrase goes, WHERE'S THE BEEF?
It really isn't a bad book, but as a seasoned reader of thrillers, Genuine Fraud was really just a Genuine Meh. 3 out of 5 stars.
For a while.
Once I began to really delve back to where Jule became friends with Imogene I started having more questions and doubts about her story. I realized how horrible of a person Jule was and I understood that it was her way of survival but she wasn’t even smart about it? Most of it was pure dumb luck. I don’t know how she got away with half of what she did with no one questioning her about them yet she runs away in a blaze of glory. I’m purposefully being vague in case someone wants to read this awful story but it ended up not working for me.
The setting ended up sucking, the plot was a simple mystery told backwards that could have been easily solved within minutes, there wasn’t a single interesting character, a nonexistent romance, and a vengeful couple of people that literally made a peep and then never heard from again.
I was not a fan.
The book is set very clever by the way a reader learns goes through the plot, every chapter brings it one step prior to what I have read just now. Still I would suggest for you not to cheat while reading.
Genuine Fraud is about a broken personality who has no real
I picked up the book because of the high popularity and cover intrigues me.
I read through the book until I reached a point I don't care what it is about, I had prior read a review which said it was so interesting and after the last page the reader went straight to the very first page to reread again, and that was the only thing that kept me reading further. But, my own thoughts did not reach this stage at all - kind of wasted reading time.
The main character Jules has witnessed her parents death and being taken by the same person, her mental stage and whatsoever is under question in my opinion, she is jealous to mostly everyone and doesn't approve her best friend having relationships with all the guys. She creates double stories and hides her truth self at all times, to everyone and about everything her stories, as a compulsive lair don't match. For those who start to question her, they must go..
Genuine Fraud is one of the most unique teen thrillers that I've read. So many fall into the same tropes (a teen having an affair with a teacher, a love triangle, a new friend to be jealous of, etc etc.) that they blend together in my mind. This one doesn't fall into any of those tropes and stands apart from those thrillers. The book is told backwards. It took a bit to get used to and figure out what was happening in what order. I spent way too long looking at the dates trying to figure out the pattern, which is that each chapter backs up one month. Once I got it, the story flowed more freely for me.
Jule is a bit of an enigma for most of the book. She imagines herself as a bad ass secret agent, but we don't know her situation until the end. Her view is completely clouded by her fantasies, making her narrative completely unreliable. My view of her changed as the novel traveled backwards in time. At the beginning of the novel, Jule seems to be some sort of heiress with unlimited funds for resorts, luxuries, disguises, and payoffs. Then the police are following her and my mind races with possibilities. Her true origin is much less glamorous. I love how the story reveals the mystery, introduces characters, and uncovers twists and turns bit by bit.
Genuine Fraud is a surprising book that seems more adult than its YA marketing. The cover makes it seem like some sort of fluffy contemporary romance. Everyone involved is college age and I think it might have been better received as an adult thriller. There's a missing heiress, her jealous boyfriend, and Jule somehow fitting into it all. As thrillers go, this one surprised me and kept me guessing all the way to the end. It's a short book that only took me a day to read and it's definitely worth your time.