Call number
Genres
Publication
Pages
Description
History. Travel. Nonfiction. HTML: An endlessly entertaining portrait of the city of Amsterdam and the ideas that make it unique, by the author of the acclaimed Island at the Center of the World Tourists know Amsterdam as a picturesque city of low-slung brick houses lining tidy canals; student travelers know it for its legal brothels and hash bars; art lovers know it for Rembrandt's glorious portraits. But the deeper history of Amsterdam, what makes it one of the most fascinating places on earth, is bound up in its unique geography-the constant battle of its citizens to keep the sea at bay and the democratic philosophy that this enduring struggle fostered. Amsterdam is the font of liberalism, in both its senses. Tolerance for free thinking and free love make it a place where, in the words of one of its mayors, "craziness is a value." But the city also fostered the deeper meaning of liberalism, one that profoundly influenced America: political and economic freedom. Amsterdam was home not only to religious dissidents and radical thinkers but to the world's first great global corporation. In this effortlessly erudite account, Russell Shorto traces the idiosyncratic evolution of Amsterdam, showing how such disparate elements as herring anatomy, naked Anabaptists parading through the streets, and an intimate gathering in a sixteenth-century wine-tasting room had a profound effect on Dutch-and world-history. Weaving in his own experiences of his adopted home, Shorto provides an ever-surprising, intellectually engaging story of Amsterdam from the building of its first canals in the 1300s, through its brutal struggle for independence, its golden age as a vast empire, to its complex present in which its cherished ideals of liberalism are under siege..… (more)
Awards
Language
Original language
Physical description
ISBN
Similar in this library
User reviews
Shorto tells a foundational story about the origins of liberalism in Amsterdam: the struggle to reclaim land from the sea required communal effort unlike conditions elsewhere in Europe. Reclaimed land became the property of individuals who were free to rent, buy or sell it. The sense of communal affiliation was enhanced, and individualism simultaneously strengthened. Feudalism thus never became entrenched in the Netherlands as the dominant economic form. I will tell you what Shorto does not: the story is a myth, with elements of reality. I am not qualified to weigh in on the proportions of the two. Scholars differ in accounting for the economic circumstances of the Amsterdam of the Middle Ages, leading into the early modern era. But it is an effective story, one that makes for a coherent, if fanciful, narrative of what came after.
The rest of the book is a colorful romp through the last four centuries in Amsterdam through the lens of liberalism and the emergence of the individual. The exploits of the Dutch East India Corporation which enriched the city; the development of a stock market which afforded the small-fry the chance to get a piece of the action; Rembrandt’s depiction of the primacy of private individual experience; Spinoza’s revolutionary rejection of religious authority and the grounding of belief in human reason, something over which institutions hold no monopoly. And we are treated to the author’s account of the dissemination of these values through a variety of channels. Notable among these are a “Dutch-invasion” account of the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and its subsequent influence on the world through emerging English power; and the Dutch role in the establishment of New York and the spread of its ideas to the New World.
I can quibble over the details. Shorto has fallen in love with Amsterdam, and has a tendency to romanticize it. How much of Dutch tolerance and liberalism is deeply-held principle and how much expediency? What about the dark side of capitalism, if Amsterdam is its parent? But this is a colorful story well-told. One cannot but emerge impressed with the dynamism of the story, and the power of the city’s history and influence.
On occasion, during periods of religious turmoil, and certainly during World War II, Amsterdam strayed from its noble traditions but it has managed to adapt and redefine itself in the post-war era and become again, a mecca of liberalism; sometimes, it could be argued, even being too tolerant and liberal.
Much of the narrative focuses on earlier centuries when The Netherlands were liberated from Spanish control and ongoing religious strife to became a center of finance and trade. Indeed, even moreso than England, they became the first " modern" country in terms of establishing corporations and successfully mixing private commerce with government coordination. Although its influence and power would wane, the first wave of " globalization" can be traced to the stock companies that were nurtured there. Translated into English, those companies are known as the Dutch East India Company, and Dutch West India Company.
Exploration and trade influenced culture, and the march of liberalism was on. How liberalism became transformed over the centuries still speaks to contemporary political and social dialogue. This work is highly recommended for anyone interested in the roots and tradition of liberalism, and it concludes with a poignant and powerful anecdote.
While not a guidebook, this would be a delightful book to read in Amsterdam. Seated by a canal or in a plaza, you can look around and ponder Shorto’s thoughts on the doings of William of Orange or Anne Frank in the buildings that surround you.
Mr. Shorto’s uses the theme “liberalism” as the prism through which he examines this history. I did not find it a compelling unifier. I thought he was stretching the definition to allow himself to tell the history and I would have preferred it if he had just recounted the city’s story.
It seems to me that he wished to differentiate this volume from the many others written about European history in general and Amsterdam/The Netherlands in particular. I don’t think it was necessary for him to do so.
Shorto is an interesting writer with a pleasant voice and I would have read this anyway without the hook of liberalism to lure me. Perhaps Shorto felt that Amsterdam’s reputation as “the world’s most liberal city” would attract those interested in lurid accounts. That is not necessary. As I said in the beginning, this is a perfectly fine short history and is worth reading if you are interested in European history as I am.
While he could rely on a good background in US history for his account of Dutch New York, he often proclaims Amsterdam's uniqueness in Europe whereas many other great cities displayed just the same behavior. A true historian is not a blind lover. While I could have done without being informed about Shorto's personal life and divorce, the city's history and the vignettes of some of its past and present are described with charm.
His main theme is the "two liberalisms" - liberalism as in laissez faire capitalism, and liberalism as in labor laws, safety nets, multiculturalism, etc. I don't think he every really reconciles these or makes their relationship very clear. But these two points give him a kind of coordinate framework on which to pin the various topics he discusses. It's an effective device.
Was the English Magna Carta the birth of liberty or was it the water committees in the Netherlands? OK, maybe it was the Athenians. Anyway, the importance of Amsterdam in world history is very likely unfamiliar to many people, as it was to me. Shorto makes a strong case for this importance. Probably we can learn some lessons to help us manage the space of possibilities covered by terms like liberalism and liberty. Shorto doesn't really provide this instruction, but he does point us in the direction of some rich history.
The history of Amsterdam is broad and Shorto both compresses a lot of detail and tends to overstate Amsterdam's significance, but appropriate to Amsterdam's characteristic of establishing individual identity, he focuses historical periods through the eyes of specific historical Amsterdam personages. These include:
- Rembrandt van Rijn - the portrait artist who explored human interior life
- Baruch Spinoza - rational philosopher who foresaw modernism
- Frieda Menco - a contemporary of Anne Frank who also went into hiding in Amsterdam and then to concentration camps. Shorto refers to extensive interviews with Menco
- Robert Jasper Grootveld - anarchist organizer of the Provo movement who helped make the 60s counter-culture a permanent facet of Amsterdam
- Ayaan Hirsi Ali - a feminist activist known for her outspoken opposition to Islam
I found this an engaging history of this fascinating city.
If you want to learn what made Amsterdam as we know it, and place it
On the other hand, you have to bear with the author and its US style of shoving "liberalism" down your throat with enthusiasm. If you can get past that, you'll have a better, contextualized understanding of this unique piece of world, and how its pioneering qualities inspired more famous parts of our world.