Call number
Genres
Publication
Pages
Description
"In an age when deleted scenes from Adam Sandler movies are saved, it's sobering to realize that some of the world's greatest prose and poetry has gone missing. This witty, wry, and unique new book rectifies that wrong. Part detective story, part history lesson, part expose, The Book of Lost Books is the first guide to literature's what-ifs and never-weres. In compulsively readable fashion, Stuart Kelly reveals details about tantalizing vanished works by the famous, the acclaimed, and the influential, from the time of cave drawings to the late twentieth century. Here are the true stories behind stories, poems, and plays that now exist only in imagination: Aristophanes' Heracles, the Stage Manager was one of the playwright's several spoofs that disappeared. Love's Labours Won may have been a sequel to Shakespeare's Love's Labours Lost--or was it just an alternative title for The Taming of the Shrew? Jane Austen's incomplete novel Sanditon, was a critique of hypochondriacs and cures started when the author was fatally ill. Nikolai Gogol burned the second half of Dead Souls after a religious conversion convinced him that literature was paganism. Some of the thousand pages of William Burroughs's original Naked Lunch were stolen and sold on the street by Algerian street boys. Sylvia Plath's widower, Ted Hughes, claimed that the 130 pages of her second novel, perhaps based on their marriage, were lost after her death. Whether destroyed (Socrates' versions of Aesop's Fables), misplaced (Malcolm Lowry's Ultramarine was pinched from his publisher's car), interrupted by the author's death (Robert Louis Stevenson's Weir of Hermiston), or simply never begun (Vladimir Nabokov's Speak, America, a second volume of his memoirs), these missing links create a history of literature for a parallel world. Civilized and satirical, erudite yet accessible, The Book of Lost Books is itself a find."--Publisher's website. A history of world literature showcases authors whose books have been missing, destroyed, or left unfinished, describing works that have been lost by such authors as Euripides, Shakespeare, Charles Dickens, and Sylvia Plath.… (more)
Language
Original language
Original publication date
Physical description
ISBN
Similar in this library
User reviews
What I got instead was what the book perhaps ought to have been titled: The Book of Authors, Some of Whose Works Have been Lost. Kelly focuses far too much on the biographical details of the authors he chooses to highlight, and not nearly enough on their lost works. While his sketches of their lives are well-written and quite interesting, there were several occasions where I had to re-read an essay two or three times before I discovered what exactly had gone missing.
This is a good start, and hopefully Kelly's effort will encourage other literary scholars to examine this area of their field more closely. I hope that future endeavors will be better executed.
The author's enthusiasm for the subject is obvious but he doesn't always convey it to the reader. He can be tiring when he writes of writers' lives and psychology. He was most interesting when he wrote of ancient writers whose copious books and plays are now vanished and authors whose actual works were destroyed.
Whether to read this book or not is a matter of taste. If you are really interested in all aspects of books and book culture then you will find this book of interest. If not, you will find the book tiresome. It is professionally written but not especially flowing. I recommend this book to those who like books a lot.
I can't imagine how difficult it would be to research books that haven't existed in hundreds of years, or even thousands, so Stuart has done something most people wouldn't attempt. The chapters are short but informative, giving the reader reasons why the author was important (or not), his or her status or situation and why the work is lost.
Homer, Aristophanes, Philip K. Dick and Jane Austen are all namechecked and I recommend keeping a dictionary handy
I read the second edition which provides us with the bonus information around how "The Book of Lost Books" almost became a lost book itself.
I was hoping for something more anecdotal, but this book is much denser and much more targeted at people who take literature
The book deserves a higher rating; it's obvious the author is passionate about his subject, I'm just not the proper audience for it.
I have recently read several non-fiction books although I usually stick to fiction. I generally liked those books. And then I came across this book and I liked
And that's what this book is about. It consists of short, several-page chapters devoted to different writers in chronological order. Great idea and nice execution. One can see the author's fascination with the whole topic and the very detailed research he conducted.
So why am I disappointed? Because I was expecting to sit down and just read this book quickly just as I do with my fiction (and as I did with my non-fiction books recently). The topic definitely interested me, the chapters are short. Nothing should stop me. But it did not happen.
I wonder what exactly is wrong and it seems to me that this book simply lacks some unique charm. That lightness and humor that you find for example in the books of Bill Bryson. I read one short chapter, sometimes no more than four pages, and I didn't feel the need to start another one. What's more, when I tried to read a few chapters one by one, I lost my concentration, I stopped focusing on the text. I wasn't able to sit down and read 40 or 50 pages at once. Is it bad? No. It's just not a book you read all at once. Rather, one that you read for two, three months, several pages a day with breaks for some other readings. That’s all.
And I just wasn't in the mood for something like that. I try hard for it not to affect my overall rating of this book. But the truth is I read better books. This one is not bad, just not for me I think. Still, love the whole idea.