Status
Call number
Collection
Publication
Description
An examination of how the rapid spread of new forms of social interaction enabled by technology is changing the way humans form groups and exist within them, with profound long-term economic and social effects--for good and for ill. Our age's new technologies of social networking are evolving, and evolving us, into new groups doing new things in new ways, and old and new groups alike doing the old things better and more easily. Hierarchical structures that exist to manage the work of groups are seeing their raisons d'e^tre swiftly eroded by the rising tide. Business models are being destroyed, transformed, born at dizzying speeds, and the larger social impact is profound. Clay Shirky is one of our wisest observers of the transformational power of the new forms of tech-enabled social interaction, and this is his reckoning with the ramifications of all this on what we do and who we are.--From publisher description. Discusses and uses examples of how digital networks transform the ability of humans to gather and cooperate with one another.… (more)
Media reviews
User reviews
If anything, that is where the book left me somewhat wanting. While he deals very well with the effects of social collaboration, I am very interested in what this might look like in specific types of organizations. The most obvious example, for me, what he treatment of Organized Labour. He mentions, almost in passing, that this type of collaboration could change how Labour would organize and mobilize, but he never explores it in detail. Perhaps this was intentional (I am a pretty small audience to sell a book to).
I'll have to read this one again with that in mind, but I definitely recommend it for anyone interested in what the future of organizations might look like.
Most importantly, Shirky uses concrete examples to explain the purposes, uses, and usefulness of social networking tools such as discussion groups, photo sharing services, MySpace and Facebook, blogs, and so on.
Those born after 1980 might view this book as an interesting history. For those of us born before the 80's it is essential reading as we struggle to unlearn the lessons of our pre-Internet lives and to catch up with the modern generation as they hurry into the future.
I can't get the rating stars to go beyond five, but I would give this book a seven.
As well as a number of clear examples of these networks and their power, Shirkey also gives some plausible theories as to when they
All in all, this is one of those books that sums up a lot of current thinking about social networks without necessarily offering a blazing new insight. This isn't meant as a criticism though since Shirkey writes very well and has obviously put a large effort into synthesising and lucidly presenting the central ideas in this area.
Dramatic
Interesting story on Nupedia, predecessor to wikipedia. Key to wikipedia's success was making it easy to contribute.
Chapter 11 is important and practical. Promise, Tools, Bargain.
Promise creates the desire to participate. (Would be the purpose/mission in ALA Connect. Needs balance. Like the Linus Torvald Linux example, neither too provisional or too sweeping
Tools influence the kind of interaction, but culture of group is also influences. Wiki, email, mailing list, all different.
Bargain. Most complex, comes last. Need promise for Rules of interaction, what's in it for users. What you can expect from others, what others can expect from you. For example, users are less likely to contribute when a corporation profits (of if that's the solely perceived benefit) LA Times hosted editorial wiki is an example.
Duncan Watts and Steve Strogatz research on "Small World network." Small groups are densely connected. Large groups are sparsely connected (can't scale at everyone to everyone). To scale you connect small groups. Requires a small number of highly connected people, as in Malcom Gladwell's "connectors."
So that leads me to think that perhaps what I like best about Shirky's work is his particular genius at finding interesting and revealing examples from which he extrapolates his key insights. In Here Comes Everybody, he tells the story of the lost phone, uses a wonderful comparison of reading social networking to hanging out in the mall. (It's not over-sharing, it's over-listening. On the web, someone like me can complain about vapid noise on Facebook, but if I were at the mall listening in to teens telling their stories it would be clear that I was the creepy one and the kids are just being kids.) From chapter to chapter, Shirky finds good examples and uses them to tease out what he thinks are the key principles.
The third candidate for "Why Nick like Clay Shirky so damn much" is that I tend to agree with his assertions. The printing press *IS* the best comparison for the read/write web. More *is* different. (We're both Internet exceptionalists.)
So, whether it is the quality of his insight, the power of his examples, or the persuasiveness of his conclusions, I tend to be a Shirky fan. Here Comes Everybody is an excellent example of his work and a must-read for anyone trying to make sense of what the current (or formerly current) state of communication technology is doing to us as a society.
Shirky takes off from the concept of Coasian economics, market theory originated by Ronald Coase in 1937 that looked at the contractual costs and benefits of hierarchical organizations and their advantages over the free market. The premise here is that because online communications have lowered the cost of gathering groups of people together—whether in money, effort, time, materials, or manpower—this radically alters all sorts of equations throughout society. He cycles through a series of anecdotal scenarios to make his points, explaining them clearly and relevantly, without jargon; the examples are well-picked and illustrate his ideas without being heavy-handed. And his commentary is open-ended enough that you can sit back afterward and extrapolate on how it bears on the wired world of 2012, what works and fails online, and why. It's smart and thoughtful, and still relevant—no mean feat for an Internet sociology study.
It is a good read