Status
Call number
Publication
Description
Biography & Autobiography. History. Military. Nonfiction. HTML:�??Another blockbuster! Thomas Jefferson and the Tripoli Pirates reads like an edge-of-your-seat, page-turning thriller. You will love this book and also wonder why so few people know this story. No one captures the danger, intrigue, and drama of the American Revolution and its aftermath like Brian Kilmeade and Don Yaeger.�?� �??Brad Thor This is the little-known story of how a newly independent nation was challenged by four Muslim powers and what happened when America�??s third president decided to stand up to intimidation. When Thomas Jefferson became president in 1801, America faced a crisis. The new nation was deeply in debt and needed its economy to grow quickly, but its merchant ships were under attack. Pirates from North Africa�??s Barbary coast routinely captured American sailors and held them as slaves, demanding ransom and tribute payments far beyond what the new country could afford. Over the previous fifteen years, as a diplomat and then as secretary of state, Jefferson had tried to work with the Barbary states (Tripoli, Tunis, Algiers, and Morocco). Unfortunately, he found it impossible to negotiate with people who believed their religion justified the plunder and enslavement of non-Muslims. These rogue states would show no mercy�??at least not while easy money could be made by extorting the Western powers. So President Jefferson decided to move beyond diplomacy. He sent the U.S. Navy�??s new warships and a detachment of Marines to blockade Tripoli�??launching the Barbary Wars and beginning America�??s journey toward future superpower status. As they did in their previous bestseller, George Washington�??s Secret Six, Kilmeade and Yaeger have transformed a nearly forgotten slice of history into a dramatic story that will keep you turning the pages to find out what happens next. Among the many suspenseful episodes: ·Lieutenant Andrew Sterett�??s ferocious cannon battle on the high seas against the treacherous pirate ship Tripoli. ·Lieutenant Stephen Decatur�??s daring night raid of an enemy harbor, with the aim of destroying an American ship that had fallen into the pirates�?? hands. ·General William Eaton�??s unprecedented five-hundred-mile land march from Egypt to the port of Derne, where the Marines launched a surprise attack and an American flag was raised in victory on foreign soil for the first time. Few today remember these men and other heroes who inspired the Marine Corps hymn: �??From the Halls of Montezuma to the Shores of Tripoli, we fight our country�??s battles in the air, on land and sea.�?� Thomas Jefferson and the Tripoli Pirates recaptures this forgotten war that changed American history with a… (more)
User reviews
As with the Captain Phillips film, the pirates were seeking to board ships, take hostages, and seek ransom for their captures. The United States submitted to the Tribute demands of the pirates during the earlier part of the saga detailing how America sought to protect their merchant ships after the Revolution had successfully started their new country.
The Adams' Presidency left Thomas Jefferson's administration with the task of starting to settle accounts with the city states of the Southern Mediterranean shores and North African coasts, and to do so with expanded resources as the evidence of the barbarity facing Christians who were held captive by the rulers of these city states grew to give indisputable evidence of the power, cunning, and blood lust on the part of the rulers of these zones of peril on the sea where these pirates operated. Kilmeade and Yeager are able to use historical documents to capture the trials and the successes of some personable historical figures, very notable among them being Captain Decatur, Captain Bainbridge (thrice a captive), and Commodore Preble. An entertaining read, and a cautionary tale, in that the risks of treating with these outlaws show the dangerous nature of the conflict with them. The conflict emerges like a brewing intrigue in each case as attempts to negotiate are made.
As far as content,
Well, you should get the gist from that - if that's what you like, probably a good book to read. I couldn't finish it.
And then to discover that this book which was recommended to me by a coworker was in fact written by a co-host of Fox & Friends made total sense after the fact. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Note that this is not a scholarly work. The footnotes in most cases just identify the letter writer and its recipient, but without the source of the letter, although a few were the standard foornote. The sources listed the many books the authors used, including the Naval documents related to the Barbary powers, published by the government and many scholarly sources which need to be consulted for a thorough study of the topic. There are eight pages of plates with portraits of the main actors as well as reproductions of famous paintings and drawings of the period. There is a map which was extemely confusing. There were arrows pointing to various ports: I guessed that some might be of the slave trade/rum - Africa, the West Indies and America. But the rest? The authors also include an excellent index and a cast of characters.
This is a good place to start if you want to learn about the Barbary pirates and will prepare for more intense study.
Inside this book is the story of the
Also egregious is the fact that the book is fully based on the correspondence between the US leaders, not a peep of the opinions at the time of the African or European leaders. US über alles ...
Have you ever heard the line in The Marine Hymn that states “to the shores of Tripoli” and wondered what happened in Tripoli? This book will tell you why the Marines are proud their actions in Tripoli and why it might
In the early 1800’s, the rulers of Morocco, Algiers, Tripoli and Egypt extracted tribute payments from the new United States as well as other nations. The payments escalated until they were simply too much to pay for unfettered access to the Mediterranean Ocean and the northern coast of Africa. Ships and their contents were being confiscated and the sailors aboard enslaved by the rapacious rulers. Jefferson determined that the cost of tribute was more than the cost of war and sent a nascent navy to the shores of Tripoli to free the Americans held in the Barbary Coast nations and free the seas for all nations.
Much more “history” than “story” the book reveals the machinations, men and navy needed to win the war. Interesting and factual with notes and sources, this book is for the historian and the student of public policy as well as those interested in how the past affects the future.
4 of 5 stars
Tripoli declared war on the U. S. on May 14, 1801, citing a motivation that is largely the same as that driving
During the late 18th and early 19th century the four nations along North Africa's Barbary Coast—Morocco, Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli—engaged in a state supported program of piracy. They routinely attacked merchant vessels approaching Gibraltar and sailing in the Mediterranean Sea. As this was the only feasible sea route to trade with Italy, Greece, Egypt, and other ports along the Mediterranean coast, this left merchant vessels at their mercy.
The practices of the states, all Muslim nations, were particularly heinous. In addition to stealing the ships and their cargos, they enslaved everyone aboard the captured ships and demanded an exorbitant ransom for their release. France and England were powerful enough that they could have challenged the Barbary pirates successfully but they chose to pay an annual tribute for safe passage of ships flying their flags. Fledgling states like the United States could not afford to pay the sums that were demanded for the release of their citizens nor the tribute demanded for safe passage.
John Adams asked Tripoli's ambassador to the U. K. how Tripoli could justify its acts of war against a nation that, "had done them no injury." The ambassador replied that according to the Qur'an, "all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave" (page 14).
This religious justification will be familiar to readers who follow the current activities of the terrorist organizations presently murdering innocents in the Middle East.
The U. S. tried appeasement, paying tribute, and diplomacy, all to no avail. Finally and only reluctantly, President Thomas Jefferson turned to direct military intervention.
Despite my generally positive evaluation, I find the usefulness of this book as an authoritative source is diminished by the authors' organizational scheme and casual approach to documentation.
The first few chapters follow the involvement of several the key figures, one at a time, across the years of the engagement. Readers gain some familiarity with the principals but only a hazy understanding of the flow of events across the years.
Subsequently Kilmeade and Yeager offer to a more chronological rendering of the major developments. Many of the key events touched upon briefly in the early chapters are covered in more detail in these later chapters. The use of a chorological scheme that introduces key figures in their context key developments—using boxes within the chronological scheme if desirable—would have provided a superior narrative scheme for the book.
The book is also flawed by the authors' lazy approach to documentation. Most of their claims are documented by general references to books and other documents without an effort to direct readers to the precise information that supports their narrative. Readers are forced to accept the authors' conclusions as valid without a realistic means of verification.
In summary, I found this to be an interesting book that could have been significantly better.
First the weak points;
When opened the book there was a map on the inside cover.
In school it would receive a grade of "F".
It lacked an index of what the hachured area was so I presume it represents the waters controlled by the Tripoli Pirates. Bu
Since the title includes "Tripoli Pirates" the pirates must have controlled that Tripoli coast. Many other locations are mentioned in the book which are also not covered by the hachured area.
Another issue with the map is the sea routes shown. As best I can figure out, they are the slave trade routes both for procurement and sale, rather than regular commerce.
The main weakness in my opinion of this book is omission, more than the facts chosen for inclusion.
There is a lot of consternation indicated about the pirates capturing people for slavery. The captured people were sold or used for labor rather than ransom. At the same time, the American forefathers fought this war largely to stop the slave capture activity of these pirates, although other issues are mentioned such as the lack of dependability of the countries of north Africa.
The obvious omission is the ownership of slaves. Four of the five founding American Presidents owned slaves. Wikipedia has 123 for Washington, 200 owned by Jefferson, 100 by Madison, and "dozens" by Monroe. Only John Adams did not own slaves, although he refused to support abolishing slavery. So I think it is misleading to talk of slavery as one of the reasons for the war.
Strengths of the book;
The authors did make a long list of history books on this period of time. But More than that, they dug up original correspondence and congressional records of events concerning the book's topic. So the facts included are probably very accurate.
My opinions:
From this book, I conclude that the war was fought to prevent the pirates from confiscating American and European ships and had little or nothing to do with slavery. The authors have muddied the story with long descriptions of Caucasian slaves while omitting the rest of slavery, especially that so heavily endorsed at the time by the founding fathers themselves. Still, I also believe that our nation's founding fathers had many more admirable traits than most emerging nations had.
The war was or became more complex than simple trade protection. The bashas proved deceitful, and demanded the US pay them ransom for prisoners taken and tribute to allow ships to go unmolested. Our nation did not have the finances to long deal with such extortion, however, so war became inevitable. Still, there were diplomats on the ground...often making deals that suited their own interests.
The audio book was read by the author, Brian Kilmeade. I've not read anything by him before, but he comes off sounding like a combination gung-ho Marine and Duffman from the Simpsons. The book isn't read as much as shouted. And if nothing else, this highlights the author's bias and possible agenda in this book -- he often emphatically calls out the "Muslim pirates" in an inflammatory manner that is more in line with today's rhetoric and not close to Jefferson's approach to the matter. Indeed, Jefferson went through great lengths to explain to the bashas that the United States embraced all religions, theirs included. The war was many things -- but it most certainly was not a military crusade.
I'll give Kilmeade credit for an entertaining story, though, and it is perhaps of some value to those who might not otherwise give a thought to this episode in early American history. It's just more of a Hollywood telling.
I listen to over 50 audio's a year and this was the worst audio reading of book ever.
There was emphasis at the end of almost every sentence.
Not sure if story was good or not because it gave me such a headache I stop listening to it.
For years, European powers succumbed to paying "tributes" (bribes) to the Muslim rulers of north Africa to keep their ships and countrymen from
The book starts with the capture of a US merchant ship by Barbary pirates, and enslavement of its crew. The leaders of the North African nations demanded tribute in cash and goods as a fee for protection against further attacks. One of the highlights is the detailed description of the Battle of Derna in 1805, the first combined land and sea battle of US forces on non-American soil (the land group included hundreds of mercenaries).
The primary downside is an undercurrent of political slant, emphasizing a preference for the use of military force. It skims the surface of topics that warrant a deeper dive. For example, it points out the suffering of Americans enslaved by the Barbary states, but there is no mention that slavery is ongoing in the US at the same time (or of the fact that Jefferson himself owned slaves). One wonders what else has been glossed over or omitted. It has spurred my curiosity, and I plan to seek out more in-depth and impartial sources.