Status
Call number
Publication
Description
Norah Vincent's last book left her emotionally drained. Suffering from severe depression, Vincent felt she was a danger to herself. On the advice of her psychologist she committed herself to a mental institution. Out of this raw and overwhelming experience came the idea for her next book. She decided to get healthy and to study the effect of treatment on the depressed and insane "in the bin," as she calls it. Vincent's journey takes her from a big city hospital to a facility in the Midwest and finally to an upscale retreat down south, as she analyzes the impact of institutionalization on the unwell, the tyranny of drugs-as-treatment, and the dysfunctional dynamic between caregivers and patients. Vincent exposes her personal struggle insightfully as she explores the range of people, caregivers, and methodologies that guide these strange, often scary, and bizarre environments.--From publisher description.… (more)
User reviews
As with her last book, 'Self-Made Man', this is an inadvertent coming-of-age story. The journalistic narrative is gradually displaced by her struggle for self-knowledge, and in the process she discovers all kinds of things that many people already know, in this case that interpersonal psychotherapy -- the kind that doesn't need a prescription pad -- actually works.
I hasten to add that this isn't the sentimental Hollywood version. She is wonderfully dry-eyed and skeptical, and acquires not pat solutions, but the logical means for navigating past the twin whirlpools of rage and despair.
Thus her story is essentially universal. Everyone struggles with these things from time to time, and her presentation if free of the self-pity and/or glibness that are endemic to the this sort of story. It's not Thomas Szasz, nor is it Oliver Sacks, but it's still a useful and necessary book for times like ours, when psychopharmacology (and the pseudo-scientific 'cost-benefit' analysis that enthrones it) has not merely eclipsed the traditional talking cure but nearly driven it into hiding.
a) like the way this author writes. She turns phrases in an attempt be clever but usually just ends up writing something at best tangential to her main point.
b) really like this author as a person.
I did finish this book, which says something, but I wouldn't recommend it.
I listened to this book on audio, read by Tavia Gilbert. SHe does a good job with the narration especially during the extremely emotional breakthroughs that Norah Vincent has. This is such a worthwhile book! I learned a lot about anti-pschotic drugs, mental illnesses, and especially about what happiness is and how it can be attained.
It's hard to know quite what to say about this book. Something about Vincent's style rubbed me the wrong way occasionally. There are lots of rambling, disjointed philosophical questions without answers, for instance, in passages that seem designed to evoke a sense of her mental state, but which are only partially successful. And her responses and assessments are very far from objective, though to her credit she does realize and acknowledge this.
On the other hand, it's clear that this book took some degree of genuine emotional courage to write, which I do have to respect. And if many of her thoughts and insights are too personal to judge, the glimpses she gives into both the positives and the negatives of various corners of the US psychiatric system are worth paying attention to.
She easily gets herself committed into her first public health facility and begins to recount colorful stories about her fellow mental patients and scathing criticisms about the hypocrisy of the system. Only Vincent is no stranger to mental demons. She is currently taking Prozac for a history of depression and medication to aide sleep. When she stops taking her medication, she falls into a depression. So before she can commit herself into her next facility, the book then takes a turn. While it still punches at mental health procedure, it mostly becomes the author’s personal internal struggle to heal herself. Although the author does make progress and delivers some jewels about modern treatment methods worth considering, the book falls short of the salacious premise originally embarked upon.
Also, as a mental health consumer myself and being well aware of the stigma that is attached to mental illness, I found Vincent put into words feelings and thoughts that I have experienced often but did not know how to express. What it boils down to is all human beings want to be treated with respect. A great book!
According to Vincent, this book started as an investigative journalism piece, where she would admit herself into three very different types of institutions: an under-funded urban hospital ward that treated mostly the homeless; a private clinic in the Midwest that served a middle class white clientele, generally suffering from depression and boredom; and a private less conventional treatment center that catered to the upper class, mostly people who had been sent there under court mandate to get clean from drug and alcohol abuse.
Somewhere around the beginning of her first stay, her own precarious mental state crumbled and what could have potentially been an interesting examination of how mental health is treated in different areas of the country turned into an examination of one person’s mental health and how it was treated in different locations. Things took a much more personal turn very early on and increased in disturbing detail until Vincent is more or less using the book itself as personal therapy. By the end, the personal nature of the confessions Vincent was making were uncomfortable and disturbing.
My situation is that I've been subject to minor depression my whole life. ?áOnce I
Given that, I found this book effective and fascinating. ?áIt's a mess, but that's appropriate. ?áVincent is brave & brilliant indeed. ?áShe's also too close to see the forest for the trees, and she knows this. ?áShe makes some pleas for treatment strategies for patients, and then later admits that even if those were implemented, they might not help much and might backfire in some cases. ?áShe had a moment of epiphany, but admits that she'll never be happy and whole, much less free of all meds. ?áEtc. ?á
I do like that she reminds us of the power of breathing well?á(gotta try den chi bon) and of laughter (lately I've benefited from watching YouTube clips from Big Bang Theory).
The only time that I noticed her being wholly blind was when she was blaming the town & region of the Midwest for making it difficult for the patients of St. Luke's to be healthy. ?áThat's the kind of BS I've learned to expect from those who justify living in the termite mound that is NYC. ?á... ?áOk, no, some ppl are suited for New York, and some for the Great Plains... would that she could see the difference. ?áEspecially, would that she could see that the 'urban jungle' actually might not be the healthiest environment for her....
Anyway, I loved Self-Made Man and I hope she's doing well enough to write another book. ?áIt doesn't have to be immersive journalism; I'd read anything by her. ?áIf she's not writing, ok, I just hope she's found a path to a life of peace.
Having a recent ( first and definitely last ) 4 day stay in the psych ward of a local hospital ( not a City owned hospital - supposed private, but nothing like her 2nd ward ), I found the
I understand that we all have 'nice' points and ' not so nice ' ones, but some of her descriptions of the more pleasant staff irritated me. She called the office staff at St Luke ' menopausal mommies with fat fingers ' - not necessary. Her descriptions of the patients came across as mean spirited rather than just describing unpleasant traits and behavior. Having OCD and needing multiple showers a day did not make a bad situation better being around people all day who would not/could not shower and all the unpleasantness of unwashed hair and bodies entailed. So in one regard I get where her descriptions are coming from but .......
I am also not a fan of using scatological terms for anything one does in the bathroom, not because I am anti-cursing, I curse myself, so it is not a matter of prudery, but crassness and crudeness are not my bag.
I differed from her assessment of which of the 3 places were the 'best ' - I though Sr Pete, the social workers, the head shrink and support staff were lovely at St Luke's and a gazillion miles away from where I was locked up. There was no library where I was, no artwork, stripped down dull and boring rooms and no chapel for the patients but oddly one for the staff, which elicited a mega eye roll from me and my saying ' well, what the hell good is that ?? '.
3.5 stars.
Read my full review at The Book Lady's Blog.