Status
Call number
Publication
Description
A brutal triple murder in a remote Scottish farming community in 1869 leads to the arrest of seventeen-year-old Roderick Macrae. There is no question that Macrae committed this terrible act. What would lead such a shy and intelligent boy down this bloody path? And will he hang for his crime? Presented as a collection of documents discovered by the author, His Bloody Project opens with a series of police statements taken from the villagers of Culdie, Ross-shire. They offer conflicting impressions of the accused; one interviewee recalls Macrae as a gentle and quiet child, while another details him as evil and wicked. Chief among the papers is Roderick Macrae's own memoirs where he outlines the series of events leading up to the murder in eloquent and affectless prose. There follow medical reports, psychological evaluations, a courtroom transcript from the trial, and other documents that throw both Macrae's motive and his sanity into question. Graeme Macrae Burnet's multilayered narrative-centered around an unreliable narrator-will keep the reader guessing to the very end. His Bloody Project is a deeply imagined crime novel that is both thrilling and luridly entertaining from an exceptional new voice.… (more)
Media reviews
User reviews
The dour and brooding atmosphere, the unreliable narration, the dark nature of the crime all combine into a spellbinding piece of historical fiction. The author has cleverly contrived to present this fictional story as a well researched actual case study and he is to be praised for his ability to make this story feel so real. I found myself totally absorbed in Roddy’s case to the point that each psychological detail and every small discrepancy was weighed and measured, and I found that for all the information that was included, what was left unsaid gave yet another meaning to the story.
His Bloody Project is an intricate story that encourages the reader to think. It is imaginative, engrossing and a very good read.
This book has been shortlisted for the 2016 Booker Prize, and that puzzles me. I finished the book without an inkling of what the reader is supposed to do with the information presented in the novel. Am I supposed to question the murderer's sanity, or question his guilt? Could the murderer have had an accomplice, or could he have been protecting someone else? Or is everything as it appears to be, with a victim who just “needed killing”, as the saying goes? It seems to me that this subject has been done before and done better. It's hard not to compare this book with Margaret Atwood's Alias Grace.
This review is based on an electronic advanced readers copy provided by the publisher through NetGalley.
Very much in the style of many nineteenth century novels the story purports to unfold through a series of documents discovered by the author while researching his own family history. Roderick's own memoir, which he has supposedly been encouraged to write by his advocate, is contrasted with the statements of the doctors who performed the autopsies, and the other witnesses, and with the supposed newspaper account of the trial. But what I found most interesting was the evocative descriptions of the way of life of one of the remotest parts of Scotland. But this isn't any nostalgic account, the lives lived by the crofters are harsh in the extreme, and the lack of control that they have face becomes painfully obvious.
Applecross is one of the remotest parts of mainland Scotland even today, and as somewhere I have visited more than once I found it fascinating to look at this portrait of what it would have been like to live them a hundred and fifty years ago.
In the small farming village of Culdie, where each family supports themselves off the small allotment of land attached to their crofts and where the landowner controls their entire lives, Lachlan Mackenzie becomes the village constable, upsetting the lives of the Macrae family with his invented transgressions, each which puts Roderick's father ever deeper into debt. But whether Roddy murdered MacKenzie and two of his children for that reason or some other reason is left for the reader to decipher. His Bloody Project is composed of witness statements, examinations of various professionals and Roddy's own accounting, written at the request of his lawyer. It's a fascinating look at life in rural Scotland in 1869, and of how difficult it is to determine motivation across the distance of time, even with ample historical record.
Roderick Macrae is a 17-year-old accused of the brutal murder of a village constable and his two children in the Highlands crofting community of Culduie in 1869. Roddy is an intelligent boy trapped in this isolated and benighted village. His mother has recently died and his father is withdrawn and abusive.
Roddy’s story is told through a series of documents. Interviews of neighbors tell conflicting stories about Roddy’s character. Some felt that he was a gentle loner prone to dreamy observations, while others described him as a troubled soul prone to evil thoughts and acts. Indeed, he raised suspicion among his neighbors by killing a neighbor’s drowning sheep and not being very religious.
A key piece of evidence consisted of Roddy’s own memoir that relates his version of events. He tells of repeated instances of harassment at the hands of the village constable, Lachlan Mackenzie, a.k.a. Lachlan Broad. Broad had a longstanding feud with Roddy’s family combined with a truly distasteful approach to his job consisting of bullying and pettiness. This is a well-written narrative that begins to raise doubts about the authenticity of the tale Burnet is telling. It seems “quite inconceivable that a semi-literate peasant could produce such a sustained and eloquent piece of writing.”
Autopsy reports and a psychological evaluation by James Bruce Thomson (a real historical figure and eminent criminologist) raise some troubling inconsistencies with Roddy’s version. Was he insane, or just seeking revenge for unbearable abuses of his family? Was this a response to a sexual rejection by Broad’s daughter? We never get answers to these questions, but Thomson’s testimony does reveal much about theories of class and criminal behavior prevalent at the time. Thomson makes a fascinating distinction between what he calls “moral insanity” and “moral imbecility.” The former is nature while the latter is the lack of nurture. Culduie “would seem a kind of paradise… were it not for the sloth and ignorance of its inhabitants.”
Burnet reconstructs Roddy’s trial from transcripts and newspaper reports. These never doubt Roddy’s guilt, but raise considerable doubt about his motive and sanity.
With his clever narrative structure, Burnet shifts perspectives to continuously re-explore the evidence and important themes while developing highly nuanced characters. He evokes a picture of the hardship and hopelessness of tenant farmers and the privileged status of the landowners. He portrays the extreme stoicism of the simple crofters. Moreover, we gives us views of witness fallibility and an early version of the so called “insanity defense.” We do indeed get a verdict, but the truth remains unrevealed.
It was so good, in fact, that although I'd decided to read the entire longlist this year, after finishing this one I knew I'd found my winner. How the official judging plays out may be a completely different story, but this would be my hands-down choice for
The time is 1869, and a young (17) Roddy Macrae of the small remote village of Culduie, Scotland has just killed three members of one family. His family and the other villagers are crofters, ekeing out a harsh, miserable existence, and are always at the mercy of their benefactor "the factor," and his representative in the village, the Constable. Roddy confesses right away, and there is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that he is guilty. But the major question in this novel is "why?" and the story surrounding the murders is revealed slowly via different sources in this book: Roddy's memoir, written "at the behest of [his] advocate," witness statements, police statements, psychological assessments, and other voices that join in to tell the story. However, there's a big catch: from page one on, it becomes very clear that truth and perception are in the eyes of the beholders, and that both may just be slippery and elusive.
I'm really not going to say more than that little bit about the plot, because really, it's a book that should absolutely be experienced on one's own. It's a stunningly superb novel, and aside from offering readers the challenge of trying to piece together what may have actually happened and why, the author has done an excellent job here in bringing us into life in the small, rather claustrophic village of Culduie, mid 19-th century. I'll just note that aside from the mystery of the why, the social, political, religious and class explorations in this novel elevate it to something well beyond anything else I've read this year.
Reading this novel at a slower pace pays dividends, and it is definitely a book to be savored. I cannot recommend it highly enough, and I will say that anyone thinking about it would be wise to avoid any reviews or reader posts that give away much more than what's on the back-cover blurb or what I've said here. I'll also say that it is a story that demands active reader participation -- it's a thinking person's novel that really demands close attention, but also one that highly satisfies in the end. Sheesh! It seriously just does not get better than this!!!!
I found the section written from Roderick's viewpoint both harrowing and sad. The picture presented of life on a croft was depressing, as was the lack of ambition and aspiration, especially on the part of Roderick, who had a free education offered to him. The bullying meted out by Lachlan was cruel and overwhelming and I began to feel quite murderous towards him myself. In contrast, the more "factual" sections of the story were easier to read, although Roderick, even in his own first person account, wasn't an easy man to like.
There were indeed "clues" throughout the first half of the story (mostly in the form of discrepancies), which tie in with a possible explanation of Roderick's behaviour suggested at the end and these were cleverly done. On a general level, the novel shows how Victorian Scotland conflated and/or confused immorality, the "lower class", heredity and insanity.
A reasonably easy read, but thought-provoking and clever.
His Bloody Project by Scottish author Graeme Macrae Burnet reads like a true crime story even to the inclusion of a preface that explains the author's 'discovery' of documents pertaining to the crime while doing genealogy research on his family as well as footnotes at the end. The novel, for it is a novel and an extremely well-written and compelling one, is told through these documents - witness statements, Roddy's statement, conversations with witnesses recorded by his solicitor, and news reports of the trial including testimony by experts on criminal psychology including measurements of his head and the shape of his ear lobes.
His Bloody Project made it to the shortlist for the Man Booker Prize, a rare honour for any book but even rarer given that this is a historical thriller. But then this is a rare historical thriller. Macrae does an amazing job of portraying the period including the language used in formal documents, the culture, the use of phrenology to identify criminals, and, of course, the class system. Since the story is told through documents, most of the action occurs off the page*. However, the prose and the uniqueness of the tale more than make up for this. This is also a very dark and moody tale that kept me glued to the page throughout. If I was to critique His Bloody Project in two word, they would have to be 'bloody brilliant'.
*it should be noted that the description of the murders and the wounds sustained, especially to the female victim are quite graphic
I don't understand why this is on the Booker longlist, and I probably would be a little bit easier on it if it hadn't been.
In an introduction, Burnet states he was doing research into the Macrae family when he discovered this case, and the entire story reads so successfully as a "true crime" tale, that I found myself wondering if it actually was a real case... which chimes beautifully with the issues of reliability, lies and truths, secrets and guilt and criminal responsibility explored in it. Vivid, lurid, shocking, tragic... well done, Mr. Burnet.
I really struggled to get through this audiobook and I admit that I was not fully there for all portions of it, so I definitely missed some details. However, I thought the layout of the book and the writing style were very good. I felt a strong connection to the main character and I was
Burnet's novel takes the form of a case study based on documents. The primary source is Macrae's own account, written at the behest of his lawyer, who hopes to spare his life by proving him insane. But the novel also relies upon neighbors' statements taken by the police, the medical examiner's reports, psychiatric evaluations, and the complete transcript of Roddy's trial. Along the way, we're given a detailed picture of the hard, bleak, cruel life of the poor in 19th-century Scotland. It's these details, as well as the opposing views of young Roddy, that make the novel both complex and fascinating. [His Bloody Project] reads a bit like a true crime story--a genre that I'm generally not fond of. Yet it also creates an engaging story with memorable characters that draw the reader in, and the fine writing is both distinctive and appropriate to the content.
I don't want to say much more because I don't want to give any spoiler, and I want to encourage everyone to read and discover this books for themselves. I listened to the audiobook, which was perfectly read by Antony Ferguson (who has a wonderful Scottish accent).
This book was a finalist for the 2016 Man Booker Prize.
From the beginning of the novel Roderick Macrae does not attempt to refute the charges that are brought against him. Roderick maintains he only “wished to deliver (his) father from the tribulations which he had lately suffered” and deaths of Flora and Donald Mackenzie “were necessitated by their presence in the house and (his) wish to prevent them from raising the alarm.” At no point Roderick Macrae shows remorse for what he has done and his continuous insistence to be of sound mind, raise questions of his sanity throughout the trial.
According to Roderick Macrae, Lachlan Mackenzie ill-used his power to subdue the Macrae family. The two families shared a long history of wrath, and although John Macrae; Roderick’s father tried to remain calm about the wrongs committed against his family (which could be very well out of his ego) by Lachlan Mackenzie, it brought Macraes nothing but destruction. Even though, one might say Lachlan Mackenzie had it coming, the heinous nature of the crime makes one wonder if such an act can be committed by a sane person. How can one determine terms of insanity is one of the ongoing themes of the novel.
Graeme Macrae Burnet’s fiction is presented to us in a unique form. Set in the 19th century, it consists of an account by Roderick Macrae in which he describes the events that led to the gruesome killings. Furthermore, it has statements from residents of Culduie, medical reports, news paper extracts on the trial and so forth. Hence, the book reads like true crime, although it is a work of fiction, which I really appreciate about this book.
"Certainly, neither Applecross nor Camusterrach – primitive as they were – prepared us for the wretched collection of hovels that comprised the domicile of R___ M___. The short ride between Camusterrach and Culduie afforded, it must be said, a magnificent vista of isles of Raasay and Skye. The strait that separated these islands from the mainland sparkled agreeably in the sunlight. The contrast when we turned into the track which led to Culduie could not have been greater, and I can only imagine that the unfortunate natives of this place must daily avert their eyes from the beauty before them, so as not to be reminded of the squalor in which they dwell."
Also, Graeme Macrae Burnet tells us what it must have been like to live in the Scotland highlands in old days. He tells us of the many hardships a crofter like John Macrae would have had to undergo, just to barely survive.
After some prefatory remarks, the story picks up steam in the longest section of the book, a confession written by Roddy himself. Opinion at the time, the author notes, held it was entirely unlikely that a barely educated crofter, living in desperately reduced circumstances, could write such a literate account of himself and his life.
Roddy freely admits he committed the murders. The nub of the case is whether he was in his right mind when doing so and whether the then rather new insanity defense is appropriate. His victims were Lachlan Mackenzie, the autocratic and vindictive constable of the area, who seems, for various reasons and an inherent meanness, intent on breaking apart the Macrae family; Mackenzie’s 15-year-old daughter Flora, whom Roddy has gone walking with a few times and hopes to romance; and Mackenzie’s three-year-old son Danny.
In describing life in the tiny, poverty-struck village of Culduie, Roddy’s memoir recounts a great many petty tyrannies visited on the family by Mackenzie, which might (or might not) be sufficient motivation for murder. Since Roddy’s mother died in childbirth, the Macrae family has lurched through life, bathed in grief and laid low by privation. From Roddy’s confession as well as other testimony, readers gain a detailed picture of daily life and the knife-edge on which survival depends. Fans of strong courtroom dramas will relish the way the courtroom scenes in the book both reveal and conceal.
The audiobook was narrated by Antony Ferguson. He gives sufficient variety to the speech of the characters to make them both easily identifiable and compelling individuals, from the engaging Roddy to the condescending psychiatrist and prison doctor, whom author Burnet based on the real-life J Bruce Thomson, to the ostensibly straightforward journalistic accounts.
The format of this book makes it unusual in crime fiction. It is a more literary version of the dossier approach used by Dennis Wheatley, in such classics as Murder Off Miami, which our family loved to read and solve.
His Bloody Project unfolds to its inexorable conclusion, allowing readers to absorb the hopelessness of Roderick's life. Nothing is spelled out; readers are allowed to think for themselves every step of the way... and to wonder if the trial's outcome may have been different if events involving Roderick's sister had been allowed to come to light. This certainly isn't cheery reading, but it's a masterful bit of storytelling.
The book is formatted as a series of documents, including witness statements taken by investigators, psychiatric evaluations of Roderick's state of mind, trial transcripts and other documents. The heart of the novel is a personal narrative "written by" Roderick himself for his attorney, setting forth his version of the events leading up to and through the crime itself. Burnet did an excellent job of presenting the story of the crime and the trial through a 19th century lens.
My favorite parts of the book were the descriptions of the day-to-day lives and hardships of the villagers, living in what was essentially a feudal society, subject to the whims and cruelties of the landowners, constables and factors. The author vividly and convincingly portrays the hopelessness of their lives.
However, as a 21st century psychological thriller, the book is less successful, I think. While the book uses the technique of unreliable narrators, and presents contrasting and varying viewpoints of Roderick and his actions, in the end, the "big reveal" was a big let-down. In addition, the pacing was rather slow, and I never felt compelled to keep turning the pages to see what happened next.
A Newsweek review describes the book as "halfway between a thriller and a sociological study of an exploitive economic system..." I'd say it's much less than "half a thriller," although it is still a decent read.
I was intrigued by the sound of Burner's first novel, The Disappearance of Adele Bedeau, and liked His Bloody Project enough that I'd pick up his earlier book if I came across it.
3 stars
Now I realise the book is all made up, instead of being contemporary accounts as it is set out, how does that influence my view of the story? It transforms it. Now I see I am completely in the hands of the author's decisions, and what is said about all the characters may only reflect the author's prejudices. Some of the fascination of the book has gone.