Status
Call number
Publication
Description
From its first arresting sentence, Sarah Dunant's magnificent novel embroils the reader in the coming-of-age story of Alessandra Cecchi, a fourteen-year-old girl with a strong will and a passion for painting. The Birth of Venus is a tour de force, the first historical novel from one of Britain's most innovative writers of literary suspense. Alessandra Cecchi is not quite fifteen when her father, a prosperous cloth merchant, brings a young painter back from northern Europe to decorate the chapel walls in the family's Florentine palazzo. A child of the Renaissance, with a precocious mind and a talent for drawing, Alessandra is intoxicated by the painter's abilities. But their burgeoning relationship is interrupted when Alessandra's parents arrange her marriage to a wealthy, much older man. Meanwhile, Florence is changing, increasingly subject to the growing suppression imposed by the fundamentalist monk Savonarola, who is seizing religious and political control. Alessandra and her native city are caught between the Medici state, with its love of luxury, learning, and dazzling art, and the hellfire preaching and increasing violence of Savonarola's reactionary followers. Played out against this turbulent backdrop, Alessandra's married life is a misery, except for the surprising freedom it allows her to pursue her powerful attraction to the young painter and his art. It brings alive the history of Florence at its most dramatic period, telling a compulsively absorbing story of love, art, religion, and power through the passionate voice of Alessandra, a heroine with the same vibrancy of spirit as her beloved city.… (more)
User reviews
Let's start with the good: when I picked the book up, I thought "oh no...yet another historical novel about a woman who mysteriously has 20th century
Sarah Dunant did a remarkable job of creating a situation in which Alessandra can lead an extraordinary life in an oppressive time. It didn't seem outlandish, and it didn't happen because Alessandra was an "unusual soul out of her time". She was definitely a Renaissance woman. Like any woman of the Middle Ages, she had very little control over her life. She worked within her circumstances without losing character. I really appreciated that about her character.
What bugged me about the book is that it could have been so much better. It isn't a long book, typical bestseller-trade-size-391-page-book with book group questions in the back.
I prefer my historic novels a bit more dense. Dunant has an incredible story to tell, with excellent characters and the ability to evoke Renaissance Florence in its beauty and its grit. But she barely seemed to scratch the surface. It felt like Renaissance Historical Fiction Lite. I wanted more, so much more than I got. I wanted several pages about the process of mixing plaster to create frescoes, not just one paragraph. Minor characters needed to be fleshed out, time zipped by in places where I knew something important was happening and I just wasn't hearing about it. It could have been so good.
I do understand that not everyone is interested in reading a novel that describes things in such detail or devotes so much time to characterization of minor players, but I think I'm finally starting to narrow down what I like in a book. Historical Novels: must be dense. I think that people who like Historical Novels but don't want to sit down with War and Peace would enjoy this book. I think the only reasons that I couldn't get into it were my own personal needs for minutiae and information.
The audiobook is abridged, but well read by British actress Jenny Sterlin, despite her accent/
A precocious daughter of a wealthy cloth merchant in the vibrant city of Florence, Alessandra, being the youngest of 4 siblings, learns from an early age, that she does not embody the typical qualities that are commended for a woman of her stature - meek and mildness. Rather she is talented and tenacious, daring and bold in both thoughts and manners. Despite her numerous attempts to expand the boundaries that imprison her, she is faced with a choice to gain her freedom through marriage to a man or marriage to God. In the end, she will eventually be married to both, one by force, the other through choice.
The Birth of Venus is a luscious story set amidst the beauty of ancient Florence. The texture, taste, and sounds of the time are brought alive through Dunant's exquisite detail to the arts that existed at the time. As detailed as the setting of the story, Dunant is even more explicit in her explorations of love, and human nature. There are love scenes within the book that border on being vulgar and gratuitous, and yet at the same time, they reflect the power and passion of the time. The paintings and sculptures are just one outlet for that expression of love - the other being represented in their relationship with one another. I was mesmerized by story that Dunant weaved, both the tragedy and the triumph, both seen in the people and the stages in which they played out their lives.
This is representative of a certain kind of historical fiction (tracing a
The book's fiction contained too much coincidences and was too steamy for my prude taste. It follows the life Alessandra, from girlhood, through love with a painter and his art, through unsatisfying marriage, to becoming a nun for most of her life. She just happens to be related to the Medicis, she just happens to meet and fall in love in the era's most famous artist as a young man, she just happens to be at the center of political events in the active phase of her life. That's a bit too much of “happens to be” for a fictional character. I understand that for writing historical fictional it can be useful if the protagonist is close to the center of the well-known historical events. But for that type of book it is better to write about a real person. If you want to write a zeitgeist novel though it is better to focus on a fictional figure and concentrate the period's characteristics on her life. Combining the two kinds of historical fiction rarely comes out as a coherent and authentic story.
Therefore I recommend the book for its depiction of history, but as a story it left me cold.
To further my disappointment, Dunant is a terrible writer. Her prose is flat, and she changes tense within the same paragraph. This story had so much promise, but what could have been interesting was made boring. And worse, her main character is blatantly anachronistic. Thoroughly modern, she thinks and acts just like a 21st-century woman.
This is an excellent example of poorly written historical fiction.
The first hundred pages of this book annoyed the bloody hell out of me. Dunant flits between past and present tense, seemingly at random. She starts off in past tense. She quickly shifts to
And then, about a hundred pages in, she stops doing it. Bam. Suddenly the entire book is in the past tense, with occasional present-tense references to the other characters. (Not all of these make sense in context, but they're not as jarring as the back and forth was).
I've got to say, it was quite readable from thereon out. Dunant's prose is smooth and straightforward when she's not playing dodgy games with tense, and I appreciated the way she developed the historical setting. I do love Renaissance Italy, and it was nice to be back there. I felt that Dunant did a good job of capturing just what it would have felt like to be a young woman in Savonarola's Florence. I also enjoyed all the artistic references, though I must say I was expecting more of them in a book named after one of the most famous paintings in Western art.
So it wasn't a bad book after those first hundred pages, but I didn't find it particularly compelling. I never came to feel for Alessandra, and I felt like Dunant could have done a lot more with the rest of the characters. She introduces some really interesting scenarios, then fails to do much with them. I'd have loved some more insight into everything that passed between Alessandra and Cristoforo, in particular; it's a shame that Dunant mostly glosses over their relationship. The romance, too, fell flat for me, and I was disappointed with the way the murder subplot was resolved.
So that's that. It's a readable book with a nicely developed setting, but the rest of it leaves something to be desired. If you'd like to take a short jaunt through Renaissance Florence, it's worth borrowing from the library, but I wouldn't say it's one to buy.
(A longer version of this review originally appeared on my blog, Stella Matutina).
Sister Lucrezia, formerly Alessandra Cecchi, is a resident of late 15th-early 16th century Florence. We follow her life from age 14 until her death. From girlhood, Alessandra wanted to be an artist, but roles for women at that time were quite constricted:
"…I am stuck in this house while my parents look for a husband for me. Eventually they will buy one with a good name and I will go to his house, run his household, have his children, and disappear into the fabric of his life like a pale thread of color in a tapestry.”
As soon as Alessandra starts bleeding (and therefore is officially no longer a child), her parents do indeed find her a husband, who is forty-eight. He doesn’t intrigue her like the young painter her parents hired to adorn the family chapel, but Alessandra understands what is possible and what isn’t, and becomes the wife of Cristoforo Langella.
As Alessandra’s life unfolds, simultaneously we learn about the politics of Florence, a city then rapidly falling under the spell of the fire-breathing fanatical Dominican monk Girolamo Savonarola. We also get a taste of the artistic excitement in a period graced by Botticelli Donatello, Botticelli, Raphael, Michaelangelo, and Brunelleschi, among others. And we learn about the sad situation for women (not to mention gay men), and how Alessandra nevertheless manages to realize love and happiness for a time, memorialized in her skin.
Evaluation: Dunant is a talented writer of historical fiction. Her women are strong characters, and her evocation of Renaissance Florence brings to vivid life the sights and smells and colors of the time. Both this book and Sacred Hearts paint detailed and poignant pictures of what life was like for women at a time when society was in a ferment of change, but women’s options were still limited and often stifling.
Freedom, independent thought and pursuit of learning are prominent themes in this novel and it was interesting to see them explored in the context of Renaissance Florence. I'd always assumed that with Florence being the cradle of art and learning of that time it was a relatively progressive society where curiosity and education were encouraged for anybody who had the ability to pursue it, but this novel paints a picture of a society where women were not encouraged to pursue much beyond getting married and birthing children, and a passion for learning was considered a shameful shortcoming, one to be kept a secret, a sin even. That was very surprising to me, considering how different was the world of Milan in the same period as portrayed in Leonardo's Swans by Karen Essex, with Isabella d'Este openly patronizing artists and collecting art. I could hardly believe both books were set in the same era and in what we know now as the same country.
The story was full of unexpected plot twists, from the problems with Alessandra's marriage to her relationship with the painter, whose name we never find out. They kept the story moving but for me they weren't the most interesting part. Instead I particularly enjoyed Alessandra's passion for art and literature, her willingness to take risks to pursue painting, and the effect that practicing her art has on her. I particularly enjoyed the section where she painted her way through the darkest depression saying that that was how she healed herself. Moreover, it was really fascinating to see such literary erudition in a person so young. I am twice Alessandra's age and I haven't read the Divine Comedy even once, let alone Aristotle or Socrates. Having read a number of novels set in centuries past I'm inclined to believe that this was not unusual for nobility of that time and every time I read about characters such as Alessandra I can't help but be impressed.
What I had trouble with was character development. Majority of secondary characters
were one-dimensional and sometimes even the key traits of main characters weren't all that prominent until they were stated. For example, there is much talk about Alessandra wanting to be free from the constant supervision she had in her parents' house, but I never got that vibe from her until it was expressed for the first time. It actually took me by surprise, I thought she seemed quite content, her antagonistic relationship with her brothers notwithstanding. My favorite characters in this book were Alessandra's mother, her slave Erila, and her husband Cristoforo. They had histories, secrets, and there was an energy about them that made me want to learn more about them. They were also the ones who allowed the humanity of Alessandra's character to be revealed to a greater extent, improving the novel in the process.
The story unfolds against the backdrop of a religious zealot taking hold of Florence with his teachings and the effects this has on the city. This situation and how it changes Alessandra's life and prospects is an interesting commentary on what can happen in a society if a charismatic leader wins over increasingly greater crowds and how the social landscape can change as a result.
This is an intriguing story driven by characters with plenty of secrets and I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys historical fiction with a twist.
But their burgeoning relationship is interrupted when Alessandra’s parents arrange her marriage to a wealthy, much older man. Meanwhile, Florence is changing, increasingly subject to the growing suppression imposed by the fundamentalist monk Savonarola, who is seizing religious and political control. Alessandra and her native city are caught between the Medici state, with its love of luxury, learning, and dazzling art, and the hellfire preaching and increasing violence of Savonarola’s reactionary followers. Played out against this turbulent backdrop, Alessandra’s married life is a misery, except for the surprising freedom it allows her to pursue her powerful attraction to the young painter and his art.
The Birth of Venus is a tour de force, the first historical novel from one of Britain’s most innovative writers of literary suspense. It brings alive the history of Florence at its most dramatic period, telling a compulsively absorbing story of love, art, religion, and power through the passionate voice of Alessandra, a heroine with the same vibrancy of spirit as her beloved city.
This story is told mainly in flashback, but we lead off with the death of an aged nun. When
This is yet another indictment of Church-as-State, and just another chapter in the story of why the separation is so necessary. It is also a very vivid book, well-told, and a highlight of my 2006 reading year. It deserves most of its accolades.
I thought this was a good read but it wasn't anything amazing. Maybe because 15th century Italy has been done in so many different ways in many different stories. I do like the interspersion of the Medici family and the fanatical monk Savonarola who tries to clean up the city a little too fervently. I did like Alessandra and loved her spunk. Sometimes some of the characters and their language were, I thought, unnecessarily crude. However, the beginning of the book drew you into the story and while the ending wasn't an impossible happily-ever-after...it did leave you somewhat satisfied.
I loved the idea of the story, and it was certainly romantic. I have one major problem with this novel though - why was it necessary to keep the identity of the painter hidden? I did some searching after I finished reading to see if I could figure out who he was supposed to be but got frustrated. I am assuming that he was made up, which also felt unnecessary. Certainly it would have been possible to place another historical figure in, or at least give him a name!
Anyways, I did feel rather bad for Alessandra. She was so put upon, though I thought she handled the events of her life with remarkable grace considering her young age. I was pleased with the pace of the story, and though I felt that the last years of Alessandra's life was not adequately explained, I did enjoy the novel. So, I would certainly recommend to anyone interested in historical fiction with a romantic edge.
The core
While I can look past mistakes in form and technical aspect of things if the story grips me because this one didn't I tended to find the mistakes in this one easier and it bothered me. I know others have enjoyed the book and I would love for them to perhaps tell me the key to what I am missing here although perhaps I am not missing anything at all, I just did not care for it much. If you like predictable plot, and a lot of art talk this may be a read for you, otherwise I wouldn’t read it.
From there, the story goes back in time to retrace the nun's history. The pace of the novel is a bit slower now, but still intriguing nonetheless. A few minor plot twists are thrown in along the way, and the reader is anxious to know how the main character of Alessandra evolves into the nun at the beginning of the story. I must admit I was doubtful as to the credibility of how Dunant was going to bring this full circle, but I was quite pleased by how she did end up doing so.
I’d like to say a big “thank you” to Sarah Dunant for breaking my losing streak. I just finished her Birth of Venus and it’s exquisite. Not only is the time period expertly researched but she manages to hit on those emotions that were felt so deeply then and still ring true, today. Themes of sexuality, both general and orientation, are explored in an unabashed, dare I say, naked way that leaves the reader feeling less exposed and more unburdened.
Her tale follows Florentine and budding artist, Alessandra, the youngest daughter of a wealthy cloth merchant, from girlhood to twilight, tripping along through history on her way. As Alessandra is coming of age, Florence is coming to grips with the Medici murders and the rise of crazed Dominican priest, Savonarola. It is a time between flourishing culture and the horrific Bonfire of the Vanities. Michelangelo and Da Vinci are young men, virtually unknown but it is already a culture of beauty and freedom that takes a strong dislike to the pulpit thumping of the man of the hour.
Through the trouble and strife, Alessandra encounters several great figures from history, laying claim to several as lovers and relatives in her wake. To say much more about the actual story woven would do a disservice to Dunant’s beautifully crafted masterpiece. The writing is flawless but not the most impressive part. The overall story itself is the stronger aspect. She is able to capture the tone of the time in a way that makes it parallel in many ways to our own. Closeted heads of state, teen angst, young love, tortured starving artists, corruption, censorship and abuse of power are all intertwined to create a tapestry that, with a few tweaks could take place several hundred years in the future.
As I mentioned before, this is a must read and my new recommendation. If you like art, love, history, sex, violence or any combination thereof, The Birth of Venus is well worth diving in to.
I enjoyed the story very much, but it did get bogged down a bit.