Status
Available
Publication
Bantam Books (1978), Edition: 13th Printing, Mass Market Paperback
Description
History. Nonfiction. HTML: The fateful quarter century leading up to World War I was a time when the world of privilege still existed in Olympian luxury and the world of protest was "heaving in its pain, its power, and its hate." The age was the climax of a century of the most accelerated rate of change to that point in history, a cataclysmic shaping of destiny. Barbara Tuchman brings to vivid life the people, places, and events that shaped the years leading up to the Great War: the Edwardian aristocracy; the anarchists of Europe and America; Germany and its self-depicted hero, Richard Strauss; Diaghilev's Russian Ballet and Stravinsky's music; the Dreyfus Affair; two peace conferences in the Hague; and, finally, the youth, ideals, enthusiasm, and tragedy of socialism, epitomized by the death of heroic Jean Jaurès on the night the war began and an epoch ended.… (more)
User reviews
LibraryThing member McCaine
The "Proud Tower" is one of Barbara Tuchman's many popular historical works. The Ballantine (mass paperback) edition is a reprint of the 1966 original, probably made because Tuchman's pleasant and accessible writing style has guaranteed excellent sales on all her books. In this particular work, she
But it is here also that the content does not merit the style. Tuchman clearly has a good knowledge of her subject and a popular historian's love for storytelling, but what mars her project is her obvious bias and unfairness towards some of the subjects she writes about. For example, her first chapter, on the British upper class, pays absolutely no attention to any of the striking class differences of the time, to the role of Labour leaders, to the economic basis on which the British rentier system was based, etc.
On the contrary, all we are given is some sixty pages meant to convey the utterly clich?d conservative message: that the British aristocracy was perhaps a little far detached from current events, but nevertheless their leisure allowed them to rule the country well thanks to the virtues of upper class education and their lack of "greed".
The same approach is taken towards the other end of the spectrum, in this case incidentally in the next chapter, where Tuchman discusses the anarchist movements. At no point is she willing to even entertain the idea that the anarchists might have had legitimate ideas and that perhaps the lack of enfranchisement and opportunities was a cause for their, admittedly, radical and violent approach. Oh no. Instead the reader is bombarded with phrases such as "the Idea", "the bomb was to be the Messiah", "throbbing with the consciousness of Martyrdom", etc. etc. At each and every turn Tuchman takes her time to discredit every lower class attempt at lashing back, to speak her contempt for the ideals of young, suffering people ("a rebellious soul", "a highly excitable nature"), and to underline how much she hates the idea of revolution even if it is from the horrors of industrial age capitalism and hardly or not at all democratic states ("his goal, like his hate, was generalized toward destruction", "[he] wrote wrathfully for the revolutionary press", "behind the poor foolish megalomania (...) glowed the Idea") and so on. Her own 'insight' into anarchism seems to be best represented by this callous quote: "One of them [the poor] with a sense of injury or a sense of mission, would rise up, go out and kill-and sacrifice his own life on the altar of the Idea". I am myself no anarchist, but her treatment of desperate people, so crushed by their society that they see no other way out than the violent overthrow of even the whole idea of governance, is nothing but cruel and stupefying.
Looking at the following chapters in the book proves this to be no accident. Her description of the transformation of the United States from an isolationist country to a more imperialist approach is positively gushing (expansionists being invariably described as "an adroit master of political strategy and tactics" and "shrewd, worldly, forceful" etc.), she blames the assassination of McKinley for ending attempts to block the negative sides of this imperialism (never anywhere mentioning McKinley's corruption and support for union busting etc.), and when by Chapter Five Tuchman was trying to explain how futile the attempts of the various Peace Conferences were and she describes one of the main expansionist thinkers, Admiral Mahan, as "trying to instruct the public to take an honest look at war", I had enough. Only the chapter about Dreyfus seemed untainted by her dubious look at history, although this is of course easy since the good and the bad side are quite clear to distinguish from hindsight in that particular affair.
This book may be fun for light reading and informative if you know little about the period, but I would not ever rely on it for an honest view of the people or events described in it. For that, it is simply too tainted by her constant awe for all aristocrats and her equally strong contempt for all attempts at political change. Progressive minded people, beware.
Show More
sets out to describe how the late Victorian period (indicated here as roughly 1890-1914) was not a time of peace and progress, as is often the way it is portrayed in the most simple and shallow of historical descriptions such as those in high schools, but in reality a period of upheaval and tension, making World War I rather a climax than a sudden break. But it is here also that the content does not merit the style. Tuchman clearly has a good knowledge of her subject and a popular historian's love for storytelling, but what mars her project is her obvious bias and unfairness towards some of the subjects she writes about. For example, her first chapter, on the British upper class, pays absolutely no attention to any of the striking class differences of the time, to the role of Labour leaders, to the economic basis on which the British rentier system was based, etc.
On the contrary, all we are given is some sixty pages meant to convey the utterly clich?d conservative message: that the British aristocracy was perhaps a little far detached from current events, but nevertheless their leisure allowed them to rule the country well thanks to the virtues of upper class education and their lack of "greed".
The same approach is taken towards the other end of the spectrum, in this case incidentally in the next chapter, where Tuchman discusses the anarchist movements. At no point is she willing to even entertain the idea that the anarchists might have had legitimate ideas and that perhaps the lack of enfranchisement and opportunities was a cause for their, admittedly, radical and violent approach. Oh no. Instead the reader is bombarded with phrases such as "the Idea", "the bomb was to be the Messiah", "throbbing with the consciousness of Martyrdom", etc. etc. At each and every turn Tuchman takes her time to discredit every lower class attempt at lashing back, to speak her contempt for the ideals of young, suffering people ("a rebellious soul", "a highly excitable nature"), and to underline how much she hates the idea of revolution even if it is from the horrors of industrial age capitalism and hardly or not at all democratic states ("his goal, like his hate, was generalized toward destruction", "[he] wrote wrathfully for the revolutionary press", "behind the poor foolish megalomania (...) glowed the Idea") and so on. Her own 'insight' into anarchism seems to be best represented by this callous quote: "One of them [the poor] with a sense of injury or a sense of mission, would rise up, go out and kill-and sacrifice his own life on the altar of the Idea". I am myself no anarchist, but her treatment of desperate people, so crushed by their society that they see no other way out than the violent overthrow of even the whole idea of governance, is nothing but cruel and stupefying.
Looking at the following chapters in the book proves this to be no accident. Her description of the transformation of the United States from an isolationist country to a more imperialist approach is positively gushing (expansionists being invariably described as "an adroit master of political strategy and tactics" and "shrewd, worldly, forceful" etc.), she blames the assassination of McKinley for ending attempts to block the negative sides of this imperialism (never anywhere mentioning McKinley's corruption and support for union busting etc.), and when by Chapter Five Tuchman was trying to explain how futile the attempts of the various Peace Conferences were and she describes one of the main expansionist thinkers, Admiral Mahan, as "trying to instruct the public to take an honest look at war", I had enough. Only the chapter about Dreyfus seemed untainted by her dubious look at history, although this is of course easy since the good and the bad side are quite clear to distinguish from hindsight in that particular affair.
This book may be fun for light reading and informative if you know little about the period, but I would not ever rely on it for an honest view of the people or events described in it. For that, it is simply too tainted by her constant awe for all aristocrats and her equally strong contempt for all attempts at political change. Progressive minded people, beware.
Show Less
LibraryThing member rsubber
Very typical Tuchman, beaucoup de details quotidiens, and compelling context. Several slices of the mindset of Americans, English, French and Europeans in the prelude to World War I. They never saw it coming. Obviously, most prediction is not useful. The lesson is to pay more attention to what
Show More
people want, and pay less attention to what they do. Show Less
LibraryThing member baswood
A social history of the world (Europe, U. S. A. and Russia) that runs the gamut between some brilliant insightful highs to some perverse and offensive lows. What else can you expect from Barbara W. Tuchman, whose book had me eagerly page turning one minute and wanting to throw it across the room
Tuchman’s excellent foreword describes her thought processes in writing the book: she says she has been highly selective in the subjects she has chosen to portray the social and cultural milieu of the period. There are chapters on late Victorian and early Edwardian governments in England, chapters on the anarchist movement in Europe, American expansionism, the Dreyfus affair in France, peace conferences at the Hague, the rise of socialism and most bizarrely the music of Richard Strauss, which she describes as the barometer of the weather in Germany. She says that there are other subjects she could have chosen to make her points about the societies in the various countries, so much so that her book could have been totally re-written. This selectivity could present the reader with some problems, because while you might well be interested in the rise of socialism, you might not be quite so interested in a long chapter on the music of Richard Strauss. To Tuchman’s credit her enthusiasm for the subjects she has chosen are undiminished and can carry the reader through the more esoteric of these.
Her book was published in 1966 and smacks of the now outdated patrician approach to history telling. At times it is like reading a selection of newspaper tabloid headlines and while these are undoubtedly entertaining and attention grabbing the reader might miss a more reasoned analysis of the issues. Tuchman is altogether short on analysis, she hits you with some facts and some colourful anecdotes of the characters involved and lets the reader form their own impressions. She cannot resist giving piquant pen portraits that sometimes verge on satire for example:
Lloyd George:
He had strong political principles but no scruples. Small and handsome, fearless, ruthless, and honey-tongued, with bright blue eyes, brown moustache and intense vitality, he constantly pursued and attracted women and adroitly avoided the occasional legal consequences. As a public speaker he was the Bernhardt of the political platform who ravished audiences with Celtic-lilt and strong emotion.
Captain Alfred Dreyfus:
As a person he was not liked by his brother officers. Stiff, silent, cold and almost unnaturally correct, he was without friends, opinions or visible feelings and attention. These characteristics appeared sinister as soon as he came under suspicion. His appearance the reverse of flamboyant, seemed the perfect cover for a spy. Of medium height and weight, medium brown hair, and medium age, thirty-six, he had a toneless voice and unremarkable features, distinguished only by rimless pince-nez, the fashionable form of eye glasses in his milieu.
Tuchman certainly has her heroes and her villains and she can’t help herself from going slightly over the top when it comes to describing handsome men. Women do not, by and large get the same treatment.
The overriding theme at the start of the period is how out of touch the leading politicians and the aristocracy were with the common people and the burgeoning industrialist. Rather like today there was a tremendous gap between the very rich and the rest of the population, but this was not such an issue for the leaders at that time because of the class system. People knew their place and although the period saw the sporadic violence of anarchism and the more thoughtful political gains of the socialist movement, when their country was seen to be threatened; nationalism took over. The herd instinct always in evidence was probably more prevalent at the turn of the nineteenth century. War it would seem was inevitable.
The Proud Tower will not be to everybody’s taste, but as an example of popular history, backed up by a wealth of research (50 pages of notes) and some humour then it proved to be an entertaining if somewhat frustrating read. Ridiculous even hysterical at times, but also packed with information and a portrait of the period that provides the basis for what happened next. A four star read.
Show More
the next. Her subject is a huge one; to give a lasting impression of the more developed countries in the period before they would all joyfully launch themselves into the first world war, and however skewed her impressions are I think she largely succeeds. Tuchman’s excellent foreword describes her thought processes in writing the book: she says she has been highly selective in the subjects she has chosen to portray the social and cultural milieu of the period. There are chapters on late Victorian and early Edwardian governments in England, chapters on the anarchist movement in Europe, American expansionism, the Dreyfus affair in France, peace conferences at the Hague, the rise of socialism and most bizarrely the music of Richard Strauss, which she describes as the barometer of the weather in Germany. She says that there are other subjects she could have chosen to make her points about the societies in the various countries, so much so that her book could have been totally re-written. This selectivity could present the reader with some problems, because while you might well be interested in the rise of socialism, you might not be quite so interested in a long chapter on the music of Richard Strauss. To Tuchman’s credit her enthusiasm for the subjects she has chosen are undiminished and can carry the reader through the more esoteric of these.
Her book was published in 1966 and smacks of the now outdated patrician approach to history telling. At times it is like reading a selection of newspaper tabloid headlines and while these are undoubtedly entertaining and attention grabbing the reader might miss a more reasoned analysis of the issues. Tuchman is altogether short on analysis, she hits you with some facts and some colourful anecdotes of the characters involved and lets the reader form their own impressions. She cannot resist giving piquant pen portraits that sometimes verge on satire for example:
Lloyd George:
He had strong political principles but no scruples. Small and handsome, fearless, ruthless, and honey-tongued, with bright blue eyes, brown moustache and intense vitality, he constantly pursued and attracted women and adroitly avoided the occasional legal consequences. As a public speaker he was the Bernhardt of the political platform who ravished audiences with Celtic-lilt and strong emotion.
Captain Alfred Dreyfus:
As a person he was not liked by his brother officers. Stiff, silent, cold and almost unnaturally correct, he was without friends, opinions or visible feelings and attention. These characteristics appeared sinister as soon as he came under suspicion. His appearance the reverse of flamboyant, seemed the perfect cover for a spy. Of medium height and weight, medium brown hair, and medium age, thirty-six, he had a toneless voice and unremarkable features, distinguished only by rimless pince-nez, the fashionable form of eye glasses in his milieu.
Tuchman certainly has her heroes and her villains and she can’t help herself from going slightly over the top when it comes to describing handsome men. Women do not, by and large get the same treatment.
The overriding theme at the start of the period is how out of touch the leading politicians and the aristocracy were with the common people and the burgeoning industrialist. Rather like today there was a tremendous gap between the very rich and the rest of the population, but this was not such an issue for the leaders at that time because of the class system. People knew their place and although the period saw the sporadic violence of anarchism and the more thoughtful political gains of the socialist movement, when their country was seen to be threatened; nationalism took over. The herd instinct always in evidence was probably more prevalent at the turn of the nineteenth century. War it would seem was inevitable.
The Proud Tower will not be to everybody’s taste, but as an example of popular history, backed up by a wealth of research (50 pages of notes) and some humour then it proved to be an entertaining if somewhat frustrating read. Ridiculous even hysterical at times, but also packed with information and a portrait of the period that provides the basis for what happened next. A four star read.
Show Less
LibraryThing member douboy50
Really a great book. Tuchman presents various segments of societies during the period of 1890-1914. Initially I thought the book only covered Europe. However, I was incorrect. Tuchman includes England, the U. S., France, Germany, the Hague Conferences, as well as discussing Socialists and
The book is a bit long, almost 550 pages. In my opinion it is worth plowing through for the insights it provides. If you are intersted in WWI, this work gives you some fine background on what was going on in the world which contributed to the outbreak of that war.
Show More
Anarchists. There is also a chapter on art and philosophy of the period. The latter chapter #6--- Neroism is in the Air, I did not 'get' at all. I did not grasp what she was going for. As a result, I just glossed over it (something I never do).The book is a bit long, almost 550 pages. In my opinion it is worth plowing through for the insights it provides. If you are intersted in WWI, this work gives you some fine background on what was going on in the world which contributed to the outbreak of that war.
Show Less
LibraryThing member tloeffler
Sometimes, the best way to understand why something happens is to study the time before it happened. Barbara Tuchman does an excellent job of placing World War I in perspective by ignoring it and writing about what was going on in the world for the 25 years preceding it. The book was not
Show More
necessarily chronological, but was divided into sections by subject (and sometimes by country). It sounds terrible, but reading a book like this helps you to realize why wars continue to happen. I don't think I ever realized just how different the world was before 1914. And yet, we keep doing the same things and expecting different results. Show Less
LibraryThing member antiquary
Easily the best of Tuchman's books among those I have read. Much more human then Guns of August and much more
knowledgable than Distant Mirror or her other work outside her own field.
knowledgable than Distant Mirror or her other work outside her own field.
LibraryThing member Schmerguls
853 The Proud Tower: A Portrait of the World Before the War 1890-1914. by Barbara Tuchman (read 20 May 1966) This book was not what I expected. It is really eight separate essays on aspects of pre-World War I life. The chapters are of uneven interest. By far the most intriguing was the chapter on
Show More
the Dreyfus affair. She says the best modern account is a 1955 book by Guy Chapman: The Dreyfus Affair: A Reassessment. But even a chapter of so seeming little interest as the one on The Hague Peace Conference was interesting. Other chapters concerned: The Patricians of England 1895-1902; Anarchism; Speaker Reed and American Imperialism; Richard Strauss (excellent--I am going to listen to Strauss music); England from 1902-11, with special interest on the House of Lords battle in 1910. and Socialism. Show Less
LibraryThing member xenchu
This was a well-written and scholarly book. It covers the pre-World War I period in Europe and the USA.
LibraryThing member Whiskey3pa
This is a very readable book about an interesting and often forgotten period. Each chapter is a snapshot, which is not entirely fair, of each nation. This system is entertaining and informative, although not exhaustive on any country. Within it's framework it is accurate and vivid.
LibraryThing member maunder
If you think the war on terror is anew phenomenon, read this study of pre-world war one culture and politics. Tuchman stops at the outbreak of the war because her purpose is to bring to life the era which lead up it - what forces contributed to it and what represented the end of once era and the
Show More
begonning of a new one. Anarchism, socialism, syndicalism and the rise of trade unions are all placed against the background of an enormously wealthy aristocracy whose ethics of service in public administration were gradually being replaced Show Less
LibraryThing member plb1934
"The "Proud Tower" is one of Barbara Tuchman's many popular historical works. ...
In this particular work, she sets out to describe how the late Victorian period (indicated here as roughly 1890-1914) was not a time of peace and progress, as is often the way it is portrayed in the most simple and
In this particular work, she sets out to describe how the late Victorian period (indicated here as roughly 1890-1914) was not a time of peace and progress, as is often the way it is portrayed in the most simple and
Show More
shallow of historical descriptions such as those in high schools, but in reality a period of upheaval and tension, making World War I rather a climax than a sudden break. " INTERESTING -A BIT TEDIOUS IN PARTS (CERTAIN SUBJECTS-MUSIC) -PLB Show Less
LibraryThing member AlexTheHunn
Tuchman investigates aspects of society and culture in the European powers which would become the main participants in World War I. She exposes the vulnerabilities of these societies evoking a world that was over-ripe.
LibraryThing member TerriBooks
I really enjoyed reading about the history of the turn of the century - the 19th into 20th. It was fascinating to see how many of the issues and problems we face today were present or had their roots in that time of great change. Power struggles and terrorism, secularism and nationalism, this book
Show More
shows it all in captivating stories about the people and events of the time before The Great War. Show Less
LibraryThing member hmskip
This is a hard read, but it paints a great picture of an era that is every bit as complicated and out of control as our own seems to be. Tuchman is a first-class writer of the history of this period. In this volume, she provides a deep-woven tapestry of the people and events that ushered the world
Show More
from the 19th century into the completely new world of the modern era. Show Less
LibraryThing member RoyHartCentre
Excellent, especially on Dreyfus and Thomas Reed, the only political friend of Mark Twain
LibraryThing member DinadansFriend
Ms Tuchman seems to be a WWI specialist, and this is a competent companion to her "The Guns of August". The book is well written and so many Americans have little grasp that the rest of the world exists, it is a pleasure to find this attempt to cure that.
LibraryThing member cyclops1771
Excellent compilation of the Anarchist movement during the upheavals of the late 19th century.
LibraryThing member Garp83
Reading The Proud Tower: A Portrait of the World Before the War 1890-1914, by Barbara Tuchman, reminds us of a style of narrative history that no longer exists, a kind that is starkly and unashamedly interpretative and neither makes a pretense to impartiality nor an attempt to disguise the
I came to Proud Tower because of my recent focus on the causes of World War I during the centennial of Europe’s singular great cataclysm – upon the heels of reading To End All Wars by Adam Hochschild, Europe’s Last Summer by David Fromkin, and Sleepwalkers by Christopher Clark – which led to the realization that my knowledge of global affairs in the decades preceding the Great War was spotty at best. Events almost never spring forth from a historical vacuum: the American Civil War, for instance, cannot be properly understand except in the context of the years that led up to it.
I have actually owned this volume for more than thirty years, a nice reminder that one of the benefit of amassing a fine personal library is that you may often pluck just what you are looking for right off of your own neatly ordered shelves. Apparently I even once made a go of reading it some years back; there was a bookmark abandoned around page fifty although I cannot recall when I made this abortive attempt. No matter: back to page one.
It should be noted at the outset that the use of the phrase “Portrait of the World Before the War” in the subtitle is no literary flourish. Proud Tower is nothing like Tuchman’s other books in its structure. In fact, it is hardly like any other book at all. Rather than a historical study it is instead a series of snapshots of nations and movements on the eve of the tragedy of the Great War that ended what historians of Europe term “the long nineteenth century.” Far from a textbook approach, Tuchman elegantly thumbnails certain aspects of prevailing national character in key countries – England, France, Germany and the United States – and significant international movements of the era: anarchism, socialism and the budding crusade for peace centered upon treaties at the Hague to avoid or moderate conflict. A chapter is devoted to each – except the Brits, who without explanation earn two. The result is an uneven narrative that combines flashes of brilliance with occasional long pauses of tedium. Still, there is much to value in Tuchman’s broad-brush approach: I learned a great deal about facets of the era that I expect will send me down various future corridors of inquiry.
Among the most fascinating portions of the book is the chapter entitled “The Idea and the Deed,” that focuses upon the anarchists – who were the unabashed terrorists of their era. All but forgotten today, the anarchists – driven by a vague anti-authoritarian impulse that promoted a stateless society -- wreaked havoc across national borders for decades with surprising successes that in the end accomplished … well … nothing. Still, on a macro level their grandiose flamboyance shook the globe with a triumph of violence that targeted heads of state with an astonishing rate of headlining achievement. In the three decades from 1881-1911, anarchists were responsible for the assassinations of Tsar Alexander II of Russia, King Umberto of Italy, King Carlos I of Portugal and his son the Crown Prince, King George I of Greece, President of the United States William McKinley, Empress Elisabeth of Austria-Hungary, a Russian Prime Minister, two Spanish Prime Ministers and the President of France -- and these were only their most prominent victims! Tuchman’s treatment of anarchism and its adherents is engrossing, although to my mind neither she nor other historians I have read on this subject properly delve into the long term consequences for European stability fraught by the murder of so many key leaders in essentially a single generation. In probing the causes for World War I, I believe that this topic begs deeper exploration.
Tuchman’s two chapters on Britain reveals a nation blessed with great freedom and protections for the rights of its citizens yet burdened with a surprisingly very narrow franchise and a shocking gap – even by the standards of the period – between the conspicuous wealth of the aristocratic elite who controlled everything and the masses of the desperately poor who turned the cogs of that storybook society of drawing rooms and balls. However, political power was – albeit very slowly – gradually coming to the labor forces who would transform British politics in the twentieth century. Tuchman’s wide-lens perspective is perhaps most effective in the long chapter on France devoted to the signature “Dreyfus Affair” and how that impacted every aspect of French politics and society. The chapter devoted to the United States highlights a clear break with its past as America – in the Spanish-American War and beyond – embarked not only upon imperialism and internationalism but a striking celebration of militarism often overlooked by historians. The chapter on the efforts at the Hague to seek through international law a triumph of diplomacy over jingoism exposes that the U.S. was among the most vigorously opposed to any limitations on the number and types of weapons permissible in combat, including “dumdum” expanding bullets, larger navies, developing prospects for air warfare – and it was America that provided the lone vote against the use of asphyxiating gas! The most bizarre chapter, and in my view the least successful, is the one on Germany entitled “Neroism is in the Air,” that seems to use opera in the era of Strauss as a metaphor for the looming madness in the German zeitgeist. Curiously, there is no chapter devoted to Russia, although the Russians step on and off stage in various dramas throughout the book.
In my opinion, the weakness in Proud Tower is that it should more probably have been fashioned as a collection of essays rather than as a continuous narrative for there is almost no flow from one chapter to the next. Tuchman’s attempt to clothe all of it in a common fabric comes in the final chapter devoted to the Socialists, entitled “The Death of Jaurès,” after its eponymous and most celebrated leader, but this effort tends to fall flat as the threads do not neatly bind the rest of the work into a definitive seamless garment. Tuchman leaves us to draw our own conclusions; here is my own: although Jean Jaurès, like Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand, is assassinated on the eve of the Great War by a nationalist rather than an anarchist, I was struck once more by the phenomenon of so many leading individuals suddenly and randomly plucked from the political sphere, voices at once silenced that might have offered some moderation to the great catastrophe of world war that was soon to engulf Europe and echo far beyond its geography. Despite its faults, I would recommend Proud Tower to any reader who seeks a greater understanding of the nature of that notable age that loomed large at the dramatic eve of one era and the terrible dawn of another.
Show More
author’s bias. In this vein, the way the story is told is nearly as important as the story itself; perhaps more so at times. Indeed, Tuchman – a true master of her craft – literally exhales pointed sentences that wickedly characterize and sometimes caricature the people, nations, and movements that come to life at the stroke of her pen. It is not the dull footnoted history of academic journals nor the sensationalized popular brand that is thin on facts and thick with swagger. Rather, it is highly observational, often judgmental and artfully written – without sacrificing the fundamentals of writing good history that at its root documents the facts on the ground. As such, Tuchman establishes the particulars and then unapologetically spells out the implications. The Proud Tower provides perhaps the best vehicle for her flourish of all of her books. Sadly, it is the kind of history that could not be written and published today, not only because the author has passed on but because this genre has passed on with her. What a pity.I came to Proud Tower because of my recent focus on the causes of World War I during the centennial of Europe’s singular great cataclysm – upon the heels of reading To End All Wars by Adam Hochschild, Europe’s Last Summer by David Fromkin, and Sleepwalkers by Christopher Clark – which led to the realization that my knowledge of global affairs in the decades preceding the Great War was spotty at best. Events almost never spring forth from a historical vacuum: the American Civil War, for instance, cannot be properly understand except in the context of the years that led up to it.
I have actually owned this volume for more than thirty years, a nice reminder that one of the benefit of amassing a fine personal library is that you may often pluck just what you are looking for right off of your own neatly ordered shelves. Apparently I even once made a go of reading it some years back; there was a bookmark abandoned around page fifty although I cannot recall when I made this abortive attempt. No matter: back to page one.
It should be noted at the outset that the use of the phrase “Portrait of the World Before the War” in the subtitle is no literary flourish. Proud Tower is nothing like Tuchman’s other books in its structure. In fact, it is hardly like any other book at all. Rather than a historical study it is instead a series of snapshots of nations and movements on the eve of the tragedy of the Great War that ended what historians of Europe term “the long nineteenth century.” Far from a textbook approach, Tuchman elegantly thumbnails certain aspects of prevailing national character in key countries – England, France, Germany and the United States – and significant international movements of the era: anarchism, socialism and the budding crusade for peace centered upon treaties at the Hague to avoid or moderate conflict. A chapter is devoted to each – except the Brits, who without explanation earn two. The result is an uneven narrative that combines flashes of brilliance with occasional long pauses of tedium. Still, there is much to value in Tuchman’s broad-brush approach: I learned a great deal about facets of the era that I expect will send me down various future corridors of inquiry.
Among the most fascinating portions of the book is the chapter entitled “The Idea and the Deed,” that focuses upon the anarchists – who were the unabashed terrorists of their era. All but forgotten today, the anarchists – driven by a vague anti-authoritarian impulse that promoted a stateless society -- wreaked havoc across national borders for decades with surprising successes that in the end accomplished … well … nothing. Still, on a macro level their grandiose flamboyance shook the globe with a triumph of violence that targeted heads of state with an astonishing rate of headlining achievement. In the three decades from 1881-1911, anarchists were responsible for the assassinations of Tsar Alexander II of Russia, King Umberto of Italy, King Carlos I of Portugal and his son the Crown Prince, King George I of Greece, President of the United States William McKinley, Empress Elisabeth of Austria-Hungary, a Russian Prime Minister, two Spanish Prime Ministers and the President of France -- and these were only their most prominent victims! Tuchman’s treatment of anarchism and its adherents is engrossing, although to my mind neither she nor other historians I have read on this subject properly delve into the long term consequences for European stability fraught by the murder of so many key leaders in essentially a single generation. In probing the causes for World War I, I believe that this topic begs deeper exploration.
Tuchman’s two chapters on Britain reveals a nation blessed with great freedom and protections for the rights of its citizens yet burdened with a surprisingly very narrow franchise and a shocking gap – even by the standards of the period – between the conspicuous wealth of the aristocratic elite who controlled everything and the masses of the desperately poor who turned the cogs of that storybook society of drawing rooms and balls. However, political power was – albeit very slowly – gradually coming to the labor forces who would transform British politics in the twentieth century. Tuchman’s wide-lens perspective is perhaps most effective in the long chapter on France devoted to the signature “Dreyfus Affair” and how that impacted every aspect of French politics and society. The chapter devoted to the United States highlights a clear break with its past as America – in the Spanish-American War and beyond – embarked not only upon imperialism and internationalism but a striking celebration of militarism often overlooked by historians. The chapter on the efforts at the Hague to seek through international law a triumph of diplomacy over jingoism exposes that the U.S. was among the most vigorously opposed to any limitations on the number and types of weapons permissible in combat, including “dumdum” expanding bullets, larger navies, developing prospects for air warfare – and it was America that provided the lone vote against the use of asphyxiating gas! The most bizarre chapter, and in my view the least successful, is the one on Germany entitled “Neroism is in the Air,” that seems to use opera in the era of Strauss as a metaphor for the looming madness in the German zeitgeist. Curiously, there is no chapter devoted to Russia, although the Russians step on and off stage in various dramas throughout the book.
In my opinion, the weakness in Proud Tower is that it should more probably have been fashioned as a collection of essays rather than as a continuous narrative for there is almost no flow from one chapter to the next. Tuchman’s attempt to clothe all of it in a common fabric comes in the final chapter devoted to the Socialists, entitled “The Death of Jaurès,” after its eponymous and most celebrated leader, but this effort tends to fall flat as the threads do not neatly bind the rest of the work into a definitive seamless garment. Tuchman leaves us to draw our own conclusions; here is my own: although Jean Jaurès, like Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand, is assassinated on the eve of the Great War by a nationalist rather than an anarchist, I was struck once more by the phenomenon of so many leading individuals suddenly and randomly plucked from the political sphere, voices at once silenced that might have offered some moderation to the great catastrophe of world war that was soon to engulf Europe and echo far beyond its geography. Despite its faults, I would recommend Proud Tower to any reader who seeks a greater understanding of the nature of that notable age that loomed large at the dramatic eve of one era and the terrible dawn of another.
Show Less
LibraryThing member marshapetry
Awesome book and great narrator but - in all honesty - really hard to get through. The author has done a stunning job of portraying what life was like before WWI: a lot on England and Europe but also America and Russia and touched upon most countries that existed at that time. It's just so detailed
Show More
that I think the average reader would get bogged down in detail - I certainly did, and had to stop and reorient myself as to what year it is. Anyway, great book but be prepared for LOTS of detail. Show Less
LibraryThing member jerry-book
Comprehensive overview of pre-WW I Europe. Tuchman shows it was a different world before the War. The War swept away 19th century Europe. I was fascinated especially to read about the growing power of the labor unions and the Socialists. It was instructive to find out why labor and the Socialists
Show More
did not do more to oppose the coming of the War. Show Less
LibraryThing member Patentnonsense
Really exemplary narrative history: the best historians, I think, are those who awaken and gratify their readers' curiosity.
LibraryThing member bookhookgeek
Got it from the library again Feb 2013 and tried to read more, but I decided it's just too boring!
LibraryThing member jeterat
Very enjoyable Tuchman, as always. This is a seminal examination of the people and culture of Europe and America before the first World War. Covering France, England, Germany, Austria, and the United States, Tuchman examines the people who shaped movements like socialism and political events such
Show More
as the Dreyfus affair. Highly recommend this history read. Show Less
LibraryThing member ricelaker
This book contained some good information put into historical context. However, there were long periods of boring verbosity. I come to expect this with Tuchman so I usually hang in there with her to glean the tidbits which I find useful.
LibraryThing member kslade
Pretty good history of Europe and the world just before World War One. Found out a lot more about the anarchists. Book was originally written in 1966.
Language
Original publication date
1966
Physical description
615 p.; 6.9 inches
ISBN
0553119818 / 9780553119817