Status
Call number
Publication
Description
Biography & Autobiography. Nonfiction. HTML: This superbly told story brings to life one of the most remarkable rulers��and men��in all of history and conveys the drama of his life and world. The Russia of Peter's birth was very different from the Russia his energy, genius, and ruthlessness shaped. Crowned co-Tsar as a child of ten, after witnessing bloody uprisings in the streets of Moscow, he would grow up propelled by an unquenchable curiosity, everywhere looking, asking, tinkering, and learning, fired by Western ideas. We see Peter in his twenties traveling "incognito" with his ambassadors to the courts of Europe; as the victorious soldier proclaimed Emperor; as the simple workman at his forge; and as the visionary statesman who single-handedly created a formidable world power. Impetuous and stubborn, bawdy and stern, relentless in his perseverance, he was capable of the greatest generosity and the greatest cruelty..… (more)
Media reviews
User reviews
anything about Russian history. I checked it out from my library's
electronic catalog on whim during a bout of insomnia, mostly hoping
that it would bore me to sleep. Unfotunately, my plan didn't work:
/Peter the Great/ is a
history.
What I liked: the book is a breeze to read. I have sometimes heard
this style of writing dubbed as "narrative nonfiction" and I think
that's a really apt description. The chapters are short and full of
novelistic details that avoid making the book a slog. I also really
liked /World/ pieces of the book. The author devoted a lot of
energy to giving context on the political situation in Europe in the
late 17th and early 18th centuries. This certainly helped me,
someone who hadn't done any prior reading on this, appreciate and
understand Peter's diplomatic maneuvers. More importantly, the
short and colorful sketches of the lives of that periods most
important figures helped break up any potential monotony through the
900 pages of material. These includes pieces on Louis XIV, William
of Orange, Charles XII, and George I as well as some minor figures
like the Duke of Marlborough, Vauban, and the (many) people named
Frederick.
What I didn't like: The book focuses of heavily on warfare and
diplomacy. I personally found the nitty-gritty details of 18th
century naval and land warface boring. There is little on how Peter
managed in the internal governance of Russia until late in the book
and it's not exhaustive. The relatively scant material (in addition
to the lack of chronology), makes it hard to appreciate Peter's
contribution on this front. The emphasis of the external, while
perhaps making the book more readable (see above), also has the
effect of downplaying the terrible toll Peter placed on the people
of Russia to pay for war and modernization.
I also found some of the writing a bit dated. Some of the
descriptions of Russian peasants ("a simple people") are kind of
offensive. The author also seems to be a bit credulous when cititng
Peter's own writing and using it to define him. Of course, if one
read Peter's letters he does come across as wholly invested in work,
but you also just devoted 10 pages to a 3 day bender he went on.
C'mon man.
Overall: I wouldn't read this book expecting to come away with a
definitive understanding of Peter, or Russia, or 18th century
geopolitics in Europe. But if you want an interesting introduction
to some of the most important figures and events of the time, you
could do worse than this book.
PS: I read this book on Kindle, which has it's advantages (no need
to carry around an 900 page novel.) But beware the well-known ebook
defect of poor image quality. In particular, the maps (which are
really useful as a companion) are unreadable.
The main subjects of the book, almost mini-books onto themselves, are Peter's Great Embassy which Massies calls one of the great events of his life and takes the reader on a journey around the capital cities of Europe at the turn of the 18th century. Next is the Great North War (1700-1721), with major battles including Narva (1700) and Poltava (1709), the later being a positive change in the fortunes and history of Russia. Sweden's Charles XII is an interesting character and his coverage in the book shadows Peter during this period, there is almost a complete biography of Charles. His famous ride across Europe, the debacle in Turkey, etc.. Then there is the incident involving Peter's son, with material enough for a TV soap it was a drama played out for all of Europe to watch. The ending is brutal and speaks volumes to the character of Peter and the times. Finally there is the consolidation of the Russian institutions in his later years and some minor conflicts with Persia and Turks. One can see patterns of conflict between neighboring powers that exist to this day in Russia.
(*) general reader - Some reviewers have criticized it as popular history. This is a mistake. Everyone is a general reader, at some point, we only become specialists after a great teacher excites us to learn more. Books such as this are important and not easy to make, works of art onto themselves.
The most dramatic personal issue Peter had to deal with was the unwillingness of his son Alexis (from his first marriage) to become his heir. The young man was totally opposite of his father in nature, going as far as fleeing the country, lying to his father, while Peter tried to "break" him, to prepare him for being an emperor - all of which finally ended in great tragedy. This drama was aptly described by Massie.
Quite a big portion of the book is given to King Charles XII of Sweden, almost equal to Peter in cruelty and quite war-crazy, as well as the description of Sweden, a close Russian neighbor and a ferocious opponent. Also, one cannot ignore Peter's unique relationship with Catherine, his second wife (of modest origins) - at times, she was the only one who could appease his rages as well as his epileptic fits and frequent fevers, and who could understand him like nobody else.
The reason that I didn't care for this book as much as for other Massie's biographies ("Catherine the Great", "Nicolas and Alexandra") is probably the tedious, extremely detailed description of brutal warfare, as well as the very elusive feeling that I had while reading: that of the author as if just recounting in his own words (albeit very skillfully) what he has read from other sources (and of course there are plenty on this subject! so it was unavoidable), while his other books had more of his own input and analysis, it seemed.
But it all goes back to Peter's personality in the end. On his deathbed, the great tsar said: "I hope God will forgive me my many sins because of the good I have tried to do for my people".
The brutish nature of life in Russia in this era is not glossed over. So many labourers died in the construction of Peter's centrepiece city St. Petersburg, and the cruel punishments of the time are depicted. Overall, this is the type of historical biography they don't write anymore. History can be and should be written to appeal to a broader audience, and also to tell things as they were, without resorting to revisionism. Books such as this encourage readers to explore history more.
If you have any interest in Russian history, I suggest that you
I should start by mentioning that I listened to the audio. It was very very
> "It is an age of gold in which we are living," Peter himself wrote to Menshikov. "Without loss of a single instant, we devote all our energies to work." He was a force of nature, and perhaps for this reason no final judgment will ever be delivered. How does one judge the endless roll of the ocean or the mighty power of the whirlwind?
I'd like to know more about Peter's governance of Russia. It's not missing, but his decrees are mostly just stated, out of order and context, and I'd like to know some of the stories behind them. I'd also like to know more about the historiography of Peter, which is only touched on a couple times.
The writing is very good, and the book is hard to put down.
> There was a tax on births, on marriages, on funerals and on the registration of wills. There was a tax on wheat and tallow. Horses were taxed, and horse hides and horse collars. There was a hat tax and a tax on the wearing of leather boots. The beard tax was systematized and enforced, and a tax on mustaches was added. Ten percent was collected from all cab fares. Houses in Moscow were taxed, and beehives throughout Russia. There was a bed tax, a bath tax, an inn tax, a tax on kitchen chimneys and on the firewood that burned in them. Nuts, melons, cucumbers, were taxed. There was even a tax on drinking water.
This list reminded me of Robert Caro, in "Working": "I thought I could have a rhythm that builds, and then change it abruptly in the last sentence. Rhythm matters. Mood matters. Sense of place matters. All these things we talk about with novels, yet I feel that for history and biography to accomplish what they should accomplish, they have to pay as much attention to these devices as novels do."
The book can get a bit heavy-handed, especially if
This is not a casual read. You have to be ready. But, this is recommended if you are looking to broaden your horizons and read about one of history's greatest figures.