Status
Call number
Genres
Publication
Description
The second revision in sixty years, this sublime collection ranges over the verse, stories, essays, and journalism of one of the twentieth century's most quotable authors. There are some stories new to the Portable, "Such a Pretty Little Picture," along with a selection of articles written for such disparate publications as Vogue, McCall's, House and Garden, and New Masses. At the heart of her serious work lies her political writings ? racial, labor, international ? and so "Soldiers of the Republic" is joined by reprints of "Not Enough" and "Sophisticated Poetry ? And the Hell With It," both of which first appeared in New Masses. "A Dorothy Parker Sampler" blends the sublime and the silly with the terrifying, a sort of tasting menu of verse, stories, essays, political journalism, a speech on writing, plus a catchy off-the-cuff rhyme she never thought to write down. "Self-Portrait" reprints an interview she did in 1956 with the Paris Review, part of a famed ongoing series of conversations ("Writers at Work") that the literary journal conducted with the best of twentieth-century writers. What makes the interviews so interesting is that they were permitted to edit their transcripts before publication, resulting in miniature autobiographies. "Letters: 1905-1962," which might be subtitled "Mrs. Parker Completely Uncensored," presents correspondence written over the period of a half century, beginning in 1905 when twelve-year-old Dottie wrote her father during a summer vacation on Long Island, and concluding with a 1962 missive from Hollywood describing her fondness for Marilyn Monroe.… (more)
User reviews
No subject is sacred when it comes to being a target of Parker's poetic wit. Her gems are enjoyable, and you'll find yourself quoting them at every opportunity. Her short stories reveal a different side of her-- a more meditative, melancholy mood. Together, in the anthology, they harmonzie and balance each other perfectly. Recommended.
I would recommend reading only a few things at a time and not trying to read it all in a week or something. Parker is best in small doses if you want to truly appreciate her wit. Otherwise you get used to her voice and forget how unique it really was for a woman from that time period.
Turns out anything she wrote that was witty, I had already read!
I enjoyed a few of her short stories, especially the ones that were
In a few of the reviews she wrote I think I saw the hint of what made her current "back in the day." Unfortunately, humor doesn't always wear well. Her "letters" were dreadfully boring....not understanding fully the intended audience nor to what she was alluding. Evidently her son suffered from Tuberculosis. The scourge of her day, and becoming one in ours, too.
All in all, it is one of those books where I can say, "I'm glad I read it," but am happy to never need to read it again. A good book to put in the guest room bookcase....
Although Parker deplored the idea of writing “like a woman,” in her short fiction she often focused on themes that women frequently write about. Her short stories tend to focus on the relationships between the sexes, and the differences that arise out of relationships between men and women. She was really good at watching people and listening to them, which is how she can write an entire story in dialogue and still get her message across by implication. Two of my favorite stories among the ones collected here are “Big Blonde,” the story of a young woman’s alcoholic decline (based on personal experience, which makes all the more powerful); and “The Game,” in which a young married couple have a dinner party at which a game (resembling Charades), innocent at first, is played. This last story highlights the fact that there’s a hidden meaning (or multiple meanings) for every action.
But her stories don’t really capture what Dorothy Parker might have been like as a person; for that, you have to look at her other works for that famous, biting wit. In her book reviews, Parker reviews not only the book but the author as well (“Dashiell Hammett is as American as a sawed-off shotgun.”). Even when she’s trying to review other people, Parker is pretty self-deprecatory; so she’ll interject her reviews and articles with personal anecdotes that poke fun at her own age, for example. I love an author who can roll with the punches, so to speak, and someone who can make fun of themselves gets extra points with me. In all, this collection is an impressive representation of the oeuvre of Dorothy Parker’s work, life, and personality.
So much, which would be baller if most of it was entertaining - alas. The poetry is abysmal (which she admits during a later-in-life
"Ah, the sun's coming out! It's going to be a lovely day, after all. Isn't that the meanest thing you ever saw in your life?"
Overall I love Mrs. Parker's work. She's one of those writers that I think can write about New York City well (although this is coming from a boy from Vermont that visits NYC about once a year). I also like her word choice too. She never overthought about a story, but she was great with dialogue and setting up a scene. Though this sampler of a book contains a variety of things, I think the things that stood out from the others stuff were her poems and her book reviews over her short stories. Her stories as she points out were mostly serious, but for me they were also for a time I never lived during to full understand. Her poems on the other hand were dark and funny or sometimes both. Only Dotty could make a joke about listing reasons not to kill yourself.
Mrs. Parker's non-fiction stuff is maybe some of the best stuff in this collection. Not only is it telling on her options on this, but it's were you see her famous witty side. I was dying when she started to write about the Beats. Basically she hated them. She wished she could like there writing because it was good, but she hated them as people. Honestly I have to agree with her, although I like some of there stuff, I wouldn't like them as people. She also hated Hollywood, more the directors and behind the scenes stuff. She was a writer tying to make it in Hollywood and gave up because the people weren't very nice to script writers.
Has much as she was bitchy about some stuff, you will find some odd things she adored too. She was a big fan of Dashiell Hammett. She liked Jonh Updike's first book that I just read and apparently we had the same thoughts. She was also a fan of the Winnie-the-Pooh books. Made me smile because I read them as an adult for the first time and enjoyed them, just was embarrassed to tell people I was reading them. She also claim Ernest Hemingway was one of the greats American short story writers (but didn't care for his novels) and she though Truman Capote could master any style of writing. I think if you wanted to pass her seal of approval you had to write out of passion, not for fun. She states in a interview they included that she didn't care for many female writers (even though she was a feminist) and especially fantasy because she though "writing for fun" wasn't what people should do in her day. In a way I have to agree with this too. Too many times I see passion left out of writing, however I have to disagree because sometimes writing is fun if you enjoy it enough.
I really like Mrs. Parker, but I know already some people wouldn't like her because she wouldn't like them. Sorry Beat lovers you not welcome in he circle of friends. Also if you can take an joke, I wouldn't read her stuff either. She not really offensive (actually she is more progressive for her time) but she had a dark sense of humor...hence the poem about suicide I mentioned earlier. However, read Dorothy Parker like look back in time a woman who said what she wanted and worked her ass off to make it anywhere.
What fresh hell is this? Why Mrs. Parker, you are a hell of a good writer.