Status
Call number
Genres
Publication
Description
The 1940s ushered in an era of Description musical experimentation and innovation at the Walt Disney Studios. Artists from all over the world flocked to California to be part of the Disney magic and their ground-breaking styles influenced character designs and story ideas for such classics as Peter Pan, Alice in Wonderland, Dumbo, and Bambi. For this volume, author Didier Ghez has unearthed hundreds of enchanting images-- from early sketches that never made it past the drawing board to polished concepts for iconic features--by five exceptional artists who shaped the style of the Studio's animation during this period of unbridled creativity. With evocative descriptions and excerpts from the artists' journals and private letters, this magnificent collection offers a rarely-seen look at the creative visionaries who breathed life into some of the most beloved films of our time. Artists included: Walt Scott, Kay Neilsen, Sylvia Holland, Retta Scott, David Hall.… (more)
User reviews
Ultimately Ghez has put together a lovely book sharing a body of mid century concept art that had been locked away in Disney's archives for decades. Some it is from familiar Disney films, others from projects that never materialized. Either way Ghez celebrates these working artists bringing their work out of the dark and shining a little light on their lives at Disney, both the good and the bad.
Each artist - Walter Scott, Kay Nielsen, Sylvia Holland, Retta Scott, and David Hall - has a brief biography to explain their work at the Studios followed by several full-color reproductions
The book's title and theme is of the storyboard artists who were involved with musical projects in the early 1940s (and they all worked on Fantasia at some point, in some way), but their contributions to the Studio and examples of their artwork range from the 1930s to the 1950s, and these are all represented.
The focus is decidedly on who the artists were, why they are interesting or worth remembering. The book includes some history of the Disney Studios itself, especially the financial problems and the strikes, but although that history is referenced for context to the artists' work, it is secondary to the artists and the artwork. I liked that the biographies give a window into what it was like to work for the Studios as a fine artist in the storyboard and concept departments, rather than the overarching story of the Studio. Extensive excerpts from Sylvia Holland's letters really helped tell the story without getting into the nitty gritty of the politics and financials of the suits.
Ultimately, the reason this book exists is the artwork. It really is beautiful, created in pencil or pastel or watercolor, a wide range of types and themes including comic character concept sketches from Walt Scott or full-blown art renderings packed with detail from David Hall. There are also several photographs of the artists next to their work, showing the size of the actual pieces and the context of how they were created - rarely one at a time but in succession and communication with other work, much of which never made it into a produced film.
I was so impressed when I first opened this book that I immediately went to Amazon and bought the first in the series, and I have taken both to my museum workplace to share with the artists and art educators I work with. I am fascinated with the art theory behind films, and these books both open a window to the early work, so many of which are masterpieces. My coworkers are just as interested in seeing different examples from skilled artists and how they adapted to Disney's needs.
The next book in the series is supposed to be about the model making department, to compliment this one about the storyboarders. I'm looking forward to getting a copy.
Didier Ghez's They Drew As They Pleased: The Hidden Art of Disney's Musical Years, is a rich, gorgeous testament to the visionary concept work of five artists with five very different styles and sensibilities. The book includes relatively brief biographies of each of the artists with a rich assortment of their pencil sketches, storyboards, watercolors and oils. The work of Disney's first female animator, Retta Scott sings with comic energy and bravado. Kay Nielsen already a successful painter and illustrator in Europe, came on to work on the Bald Mountain sequence of Fantasia. Sylvia Holland and Walt Scott added to the rich layering that was Fantasia.
Featured last in the book, and my personal favorite, David Hall did not stay long at Disney but his beautiful sketches and paintings of Alice in Wonderland and Peter Pan are a highlight by any measure.
For anyone at all interested in the history of Walt Disney Studios (which is to say the early history of feature animation!), this book is a must have and a welcome addition to a continuing series.
Most people probably think of Fantasia and the other Disney animation of the era as simply being a product of Walt himself, which of course is a tremendous slight to the legacy of the many studio animators who actually created the work, who were responsible for all that richness and art. This book is part of an admirable series intended to redress that slight, by focusing on the lives, careers, and artistic output of some of the animators who were responsible for Fantasia and other great Disney films of the era. Well-researched, handsomely laid out, and beautifully illustrated, the book highlights the careers of five Disney artists, people who none of us have ever heard of before, but whose work we have all seen. Individually, these chapters give long-overdue recognition to some extremely talented artists, and together, they provide a real insight into the creative process behind some of the greater animation ever produced.
Very highly recommended. My only complaint about the volume is that I was so pleased by it, I'll probably find myself needing to buy the remaining books in the series!
I highly recommend this book especially for any illustration and animation fans.
(Note: 5 stars = amazing, wonderful, 4 = very good book, 3 = decent read, 2 = disappointing, 1 = awful, just awful. I'm fairly good at picking for myself so