Supernatural Horror in Literature

by H.P. Lovecraft

Paperback, 1973

Status

Available

Call number

PN3435

Genres

All Topics

Nonfiction

Publication

Dover Publications, Inc. (1973), 128 pages

Description

Great modern American supernaturalist brilliantly surveys history of genre to 1930s, summarizing, evaluating scores of books, including works by Poe, Bierce, M.R. James, "Monk" Lewis, many others. Praised by critics as diverse as Edmund Wilson and Vincent Starrett. New introduction by E. F. Bleiler.

User reviews

LibraryThing member whitewavedarling

If you're looking for an overview of the beginnings of the horror genre, this is a good place to look. Lovecraft originally published this long essay in the 1930s, and it still stands up as a strong overview up through that point. He didn't leave any definative authors or works unaddressed, and the

book is sure to provide an ample extended reading list for anyone interested in the weird, the gothic, or horror. It's a quick read, and while there are no in depth discussions of any one work, the book provides a strong history of early horror and a worthwhile look at Poe. My reading list has grown quite a bit from a look into this book. If you're interested in what you're getting into, it's worth your time.

Show Less

6 more

LibraryThing member jsnrcrny

This is a very useful and informative survey of the supernatural element in literature and represents an important contribution to the study of genre writing, particularly fantasy, horror, and science fiction. No, no, no: this isn't just me ascribing to the so-called Lovecraftian "cult of

personality." Don't roll your eyes in disdain! This survey is indeed genuine literary scholarship backed up by a lifetime of reading and verifiable expertise (Lovecraft wrote reams of this stuff in correspondences with lots and lots of folks!). But don't take my word for it. Take Edmund Wilson's! Yes, indeed, Edmund Wilson--the famous literary critic and author of the famous _Axel's Castle_--went so far as to say this was Lovecraft's greatest work. This compliment, of course, came at the end of a scathing and immature review of Lovecraft's fiction; nevertheless, I take Edmund Wilson's opinion on "literary scholarship" to be more trustworthy than his opinion on genre literature. What makes this book useful? Put simply: it substantially and succinctly surveys the treatment of the supernatural element in Western literature from Roman times to Lovecraft's contemporary moment. Although Lovecraft has some silly ideas about racial memory--for example, he gives a lot of stock to the ethnicity of writers and equates ethnicity to specific literary styles or psychological temperaments--his knowledge of the canonical literature is astounding. This is not to say he includes everything. He downplays Henry James _The Turn of the Screw_ and Sheridan LaFanu; nevertheless, if you find you have interest in the origins of horror fiction or supernatural fiction in general (read fantasy and science-fiction), this is a classic study that you absolutely need to know.

Show Less

LibraryThing member SomeGuyInVirginia

I hate H.P. Lovecraft. I did even in high school when it was shorthand for a kind of literary anarchy, and before that I hated him in grade school. I could give you a dozen reasons why I’ve always hated Lovecraft, but suffice it to say that even the idea of reading one of his stories fills me

with an unfathomable, timeless and formless dread. And I’m the only one I know who feels that way. (I’m also the only person I know who hated the movie Memento, and that’s with seven hours of getting to see Guy Pearce in his underpants. Of course, it wasn’t actually seven hours, it just felt that way.)

So today the copy of Supernatural Horror in Literature that I ordered on eBay comes in the mail. It cost a buck and the shipping was four bucks. Clue #1. It’s a Dover edition (love them) but the original intro by August Derleth has been replaced with one by E.F. Bleier—Clue #2— who uses the phrase “shockingly underrepresented in American libraries” when talking about LeFanu. Uh, no he’s not. Bleier is a true believer and nothing will ever make me believe that Lovecraft was anything other than a cult of personality wiling away his time writing stories until acid could be invented. In fact, I wish Lovecraft would have lived to use acid, because I have a hunch that his vast and unsounded cosmic intelligence would have reached event horizon and imploded, and he’d have spent the rest of his days writing sensible and intelligible village cozies about landed gentry who hunt and an irascible vicar with a heart of gold.

I will never come in after a night with the boys and look for stuff to but on eBay. Clue #3. And I’m not going to give the book more than the skimming it already got. It’s going into the donate pile tonight.

But that’s just my opinion. I’m right, but it is just my opinion. If you want a really creepy story about a formless dread, read The Haunting of Hill House. Or if you're a better man than I, Gunga Din, anything from Congress.

Show Less

LibraryThing member flying_monkeys

Rating: 4 of 5

Supernatural Horror in Literature proved a helpful resource, by one of the genre's masters, for fans of literary horror and dark fiction. I daresay there are enough references included in the pages of this essay to keep readers busy for a couple years at least. However, do not expect

in-depth analysis of the works mentioned.

Now, the fun part begins ... reading the books Lovecraft suggested.

Show Less

LibraryThing member rickklaw

An excellent overview of early horror works.

LibraryThing member ghr4

H. P. Lovecraft's 1927 treatise on weird fiction provides a solid historical overview of the genre, and along the way unearths a trove of works and authors for readers to explore. An invaluable book in one's library of supernatural literature.

LibraryThing member TobinElliott

Having read all of Lovecraft's fiction, I thought this would be an interesting way to cap off his writing, with his essay on horror.

It starts out quite strong, giving a good overview of the origins of horror, and their impact. Unfortunately, once he devotes an entire section to Edgar Allan Poe, he

starts to slide off the rails a bit, focusing more on various plot summaries (both of Poe and those who he highlights in the sections that follow) than he does on their impact on horror in general.

Still, for all that, it's a fascinating look into the mind that crafted a mythos that survives a century later and influences so many big names in the horror field.

Show Less

Fewer