Status
Available
Call number
Collection
Publication
Cold Spring Press (2004), Paperback, 256 pages
Description
Henry Gee ingeniously reveals how contemporary science can explain some of the wonders of Middle Earth, where Tolkien's marvellous fantasy creates a world with an insistent sense of reality. Gee delights in explaining such scientific conundrums as: How does Frodo's coat of mithril chain armour deflect deadly blows? How good are Legolas's eyes, he can count the Riders of Rohan at a distance of five leagues, and what does that tell us about the elves? How are the orcs reproduced? Just because 'Lord of the Rings' is the world's most popular fantasy does not prevent scientific explanations for its wonders.
User reviews
LibraryThing member stnylan
A series of interconnected essays giving possible real-world scientific explanations for some of the phenomena in Middle Earth. Also an exploration of how the science of Tolkien's own time might have influenced the world he created. Not to be taken entirely seriously I think, but neither is it to
Show More
be scoffed at. A good read, and certainly a different perspective to the great man's work. Show Less
LibraryThing member maimonedes
The thing about Henry Gee is that he is a real scientist – not a populizer, not a science journalist - and he loves J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle Earth. This book is a delight (for all Tolkien fans) both for its insights into Tolkien and the “origins” of Middle Earth, as well as for the
Gee takes a many of features of Middle Earth - its denizens, its topography and its “technology” – and attempts explanations of the science possibly underlying them. In doing, so he is both faithful to the science that he represents and respectful of Tolkien’s conception of Middle Earth. When he cannot explain something – as with the “one ring” – he neither dismisses it as fantasy nor attempts a fictional way out; he simply admits that we do not yet know enough. In this way, he expounds on how Orcs came into being, the problem of the wings of the Balrogs, the acute sight and longevity of the Elves, how Frodo’s Mithril undershirt might have saved him from the troll’s spear, and many other Middle Earth topics.
In one memorable chapter, he identifies the theme of loss or diminution that pervades the Rings trilogy – loss of powers, reduction of peoples, lost skills – and relates this to both Tolkien’s personal and professional life, as a scholar of the “ancient, lost tongues of the north..his need for restitution was so great that he was driven.. to create new, lost languages.. and.. to invent a culture and mythology to go with them.”
Like all students of Middle Earth, Gee knows in his heart that, somewhere, somewhen , it really existed. This knowledge must be the motivation for his final chapter, in which he takes to task those who, like Richard Dawkins, “know” things so absolutely, that they simply cannot bear anyone else having different views of the world and of reality. How refreshing to hear another scientist try to knock that arrogant professor of “the public understanding of science” off his bully pulpit. It is surely no coincidence that the highlighted “blurb” on the rear of this book is a quote from Simon Conway Morris, professor of evolutionary paleobiology at Cambrige University. Conway Morris – less of a populizer than Dawkins and more of a real researcher – admiringly refers to how Henry Gee “..explores how the marvellous remains marvellous, but not fantastic.. “.
From now on, I will want to know every scientist’s Middle Earth credentials before taking them seriously.
Show More
scientific explanations.Gee takes a many of features of Middle Earth - its denizens, its topography and its “technology” – and attempts explanations of the science possibly underlying them. In doing, so he is both faithful to the science that he represents and respectful of Tolkien’s conception of Middle Earth. When he cannot explain something – as with the “one ring” – he neither dismisses it as fantasy nor attempts a fictional way out; he simply admits that we do not yet know enough. In this way, he expounds on how Orcs came into being, the problem of the wings of the Balrogs, the acute sight and longevity of the Elves, how Frodo’s Mithril undershirt might have saved him from the troll’s spear, and many other Middle Earth topics.
In one memorable chapter, he identifies the theme of loss or diminution that pervades the Rings trilogy – loss of powers, reduction of peoples, lost skills – and relates this to both Tolkien’s personal and professional life, as a scholar of the “ancient, lost tongues of the north..his need for restitution was so great that he was driven.. to create new, lost languages.. and.. to invent a culture and mythology to go with them.”
Like all students of Middle Earth, Gee knows in his heart that, somewhere, somewhen , it really existed. This knowledge must be the motivation for his final chapter, in which he takes to task those who, like Richard Dawkins, “know” things so absolutely, that they simply cannot bear anyone else having different views of the world and of reality. How refreshing to hear another scientist try to knock that arrogant professor of “the public understanding of science” off his bully pulpit. It is surely no coincidence that the highlighted “blurb” on the rear of this book is a quote from Simon Conway Morris, professor of evolutionary paleobiology at Cambrige University. Conway Morris – less of a populizer than Dawkins and more of a real researcher – admiringly refers to how Henry Gee “..explores how the marvellous remains marvellous, but not fantastic.. “.
From now on, I will want to know every scientist’s Middle Earth credentials before taking them seriously.
Show Less
LibraryThing member norbert.book
It's a curious witty book. Really peculiar, but I liked it really much
Subjects
Language
Original publication date
2004
Physical description
256 p.; 8.4 inches
ISBN
1593600232 / 9781593600235