Publication
London : Simon & Schuster, 2011
Physical description
295 p.; 20 inches
ISBN
9780857206619
Language
Collections
Description
Presents an explicit new tale of carnal improprieties and comic raunchiness set in a surreal but familiar world of fantasy sex. A fuse-blowing, sex-positive escapade. Baker returns to erotic territory with a gleefully over-the-top novel set in a pleasure resort where normal rules don't apply. In charge of day-to-day operations is Lila, a former hospital administrator whose breast milk has unusual regenerative properties.
Genres
User reviews
LibraryThing member gbill
A book of raunch, indeed. This one is definitely over the top. I think Baker invented a new genre here, combining farce with sex fantasy with science fiction. Playful. Comic. Erotic. Sometimes just stupid. I should have counted the number of unique descriptions he comes up with for the male and
Just this quote which is completely unrepresentative, uh, I will avoid excerpting the parts I liked the most. Hey, just admitting I purchased and read this book is enough!
On old age:
“Because she knew that his kind of easy glancing manner was not all that common. Men turned thirty-eight, thirty-nine, and it was like someone dimmed the lights. When they’re young, they’re hilarious and bubbly and boyish. And bad. So bad. When they’re old, they’re flat and stupid and dull. She watched them in airports with their wives: brain-dead, mostly. And yet this man, Chuck, was probably forty-five at least. He still had some humor left in him.”
Show More
female genitalia as well as the act itself. Obviously not one for mom and pop, and better if read in small doses at a time. Just this quote which is completely unrepresentative, uh, I will avoid excerpting the parts I liked the most. Hey, just admitting I purchased and read this book is enough!
On old age:
“Because she knew that his kind of easy glancing manner was not all that common. Men turned thirty-eight, thirty-nine, and it was like someone dimmed the lights. When they’re young, they’re hilarious and bubbly and boyish. And bad. So bad. When they’re old, they’re flat and stupid and dull. She watched them in airports with their wives: brain-dead, mostly. And yet this man, Chuck, was probably forty-five at least. He still had some humor left in him.”
Show Less
LibraryThing member EpicTale
Prompted by reading a profile about the author in an August 2011 New York Times, I requested "House of Holes" from my local public library and, lo and behold, the hold notice landed in my email queue within a few weeks. Having finished the book in an unusually short time, several words come to my
Show More
mind to describe it: delicious, shallow, funny, silly, time waster, raunchy, fantastic, literary, trashy, sexy, clever, goofy, and anti-erotic. There's no point in describing a plot or thesis, for the book contains neither. Nor is there any character development. But if you want to read a series of original sex-drenched vignettes (to either yourself or a loved one) while steering clear of Penthouse, here's your book. Show Less
LibraryThing member bookstopshere
While I didn't particularly enjoy Vox or The Fermata, I tried this based on the NYT Review of Bks review - my bad! This might be the most boring and least "erotic" book of pseudo-pornography ever written. Baker isn't always so dull; I enjoyed The Anthologist, but this is nearly unreadable
LibraryThing member Meggo
This is one book where I was led astray by the New York Times review of books, which raved about this work. I must have forgotten how lacklustre I found Baker's other book in my collection, Vox, which was supposed to be daring and pushing the boundaries, and instead, I found to be trying to hard.
Show More
The same situation applies here - Baker writes what is, essentially, 262 pages of poorly written soft porn. If it is meant to be salacious, it is far too heavy handed. If it is meant to be titillating, it is too heavy handed. Generally an unpleasant read, unless one is a prepubescent boy, who will think it is The Best Book Ever Written, because it talks about boobies. Show Less
LibraryThing member jenn_stringer
I love sexy, dirty, raunchy books. This one delivers on the dirty raunchy part and because of that it definitely won't be for everyone. Nicholson Baker is known for his dirty literary works and the NYT seems to love most of what he writes. This is my first experience and he *is* a fantastic writer.
Show More
His use of language is clever (he makes up words like "thrummiest" and "mufling") and he can draw a character with just a few lines and he is very funny. He creates a world full of weird characters and imaginary places that allows the reader to have a crazy good time. Show Less
LibraryThing member hayduke
After reading nearly a hundred pages (not even halfway) of House of Holes, the word "monotonous" started to hover over the text like a cloud. There is a lot of fun to be had between the pages of Nicholson Baker's latest novel, and part of that fun is watching Baker let his imagination run wild —
House of Holes is a pleasant diversion, albeit a hellaciously sexual one. I would label it more bawdy and bizarre than erotic, and I certainly found myself chuckling along the way towards the only climax possible in a book of this type. As a novel though I think it works better as short stories: Since there is no genuine continuity — except a few names and the title location — I think it might work better if the reader picked it up periodically rather than wading through orgasm after orgasm for 262 pages straight. Then again...
Show More
through a field of sex organs. Ultimately though, there is no character detail, or plot to follow. Just chapter after chapter of wild (predominately hetero-) sexual fantasies from the mind of one of America's premier literati.House of Holes is a pleasant diversion, albeit a hellaciously sexual one. I would label it more bawdy and bizarre than erotic, and I certainly found myself chuckling along the way towards the only climax possible in a book of this type. As a novel though I think it works better as short stories: Since there is no genuine continuity — except a few names and the title location — I think it might work better if the reader picked it up periodically rather than wading through orgasm after orgasm for 262 pages straight. Then again...
Show Less
LibraryThing member librarianbryan
I only got half way through this because I was BILLED for it by my library for keeping it too long. That made for a great circulation desk experience.
I was half way through when I received my summons and at that point I was a little disappointed that there wasn’t much of a narrative arch and each
As it stands House of Holes was a fun book of irreverent surreal pornography. If I was looking for something “light” to read I would rather read this than Alexander McCall Smith.
I couldn’t help thinking about though the way an white-bearded Caucasian erotica writer from New England is treated differently than say Zane. Food for thought. Fuel for sex.
I was half way through when I received my summons and at that point I was a little disappointed that there wasn’t much of a narrative arch and each
Show More
chapter was just a miniature tableau of one of the many naughty going-ons at the House of Holes. Maybe it comes together at the end? One of the reasons I had kept the book so long was because I was reading one chapter at a time. [Ed.note: He was doing that with about five other books simultaneously.]As it stands House of Holes was a fun book of irreverent surreal pornography. If I was looking for something “light” to read I would rather read this than Alexander McCall Smith.
I couldn’t help thinking about though the way an white-bearded Caucasian erotica writer from New England is treated differently than say Zane. Food for thought. Fuel for sex.
Show Less
LibraryThing member Ron18
I'm happy to be in a place where I see this book as an appreciable fun piece of fantasy that makes a light (and somehow purely wholesome) cartoon of sex, gender, and the things that turn people on whether they want them to or not. Others may argue the point - but I feel exceptionally mature and
The best comparison I can think of is Charlie & the Chocolate Factory. I'm pretty sure Roald Dahl would have gotten a kick out of it. The characters are caring, considerate, tender, friendly, and well-mannered - they are a reversal of the seedy abuse of power that features in a lot of sexual fantasy. But don't let that description fool you into thinking it isn't outrageous and over-the-top. I find it to be an uplifting (heh) healthy psychedelic journey. A massively sexual episode of The Love Boat. The character arcs aren't deep, but they are endearing and revelatory. They make valuable caricature of (purely, for better or worse) heteronormative ideals. A much appreciated experiment.
Show More
grounded in that appreciation, recognizing that play is life - and sex is a game imposed by nature. The best comparison I can think of is Charlie & the Chocolate Factory. I'm pretty sure Roald Dahl would have gotten a kick out of it. The characters are caring, considerate, tender, friendly, and well-mannered - they are a reversal of the seedy abuse of power that features in a lot of sexual fantasy. But don't let that description fool you into thinking it isn't outrageous and over-the-top. I find it to be an uplifting (heh) healthy psychedelic journey. A massively sexual episode of The Love Boat. The character arcs aren't deep, but they are endearing and revelatory. They make valuable caricature of (purely, for better or worse) heteronormative ideals. A much appreciated experiment.
Show Less
LibraryThing member billycongo
I don't think I'm the right person for this book. At first it seemed very inventive, but then it was just sex, sex, sex. I needed it to have some sort of purpose to it, otherwise it's just masturbation material.
LibraryThing member kropferama
Funny in spots but tedious after a while. Very loose connections -- no plot.
LibraryThing member markm2315
It doesn't strike me as very funny - some reviewers describe it as hilarious. If it isn't funny then it is soft porn, although perhaps clever.
LibraryThing member TheAmpersand
"House of Holes" doesn't come close to being a must-read, but it is fun, occasionally inventive smut with a literary slant. It's been said that pornography is nothing but a fantasy of universal consent, and Nicholson leans into the fantasy aspect here, describing a world of semi-enchanted bodily
I'm a dude myself, but I thought that the author wrote sex from the female perspective tolerably well, although "House of Holes" is, in the final analysis, straighter and more forthrightly cis that it necessarily needs to be. Genitals -- both male and female -- sometimes appear in less-than-expected places, but the essential duality of man and women doesn't come in for much questioning. This isn't a book for people who get off on ambiguity, or, for that matter, subtlety. The sort of ridiculous sex talk that's indelibly associated with letters to Penthouse is all over this collection, and it's good fun to see it in a relatively literary environment. There are so many ridiculous, gross, and just plain strange terms for genitalia here that I would lay money on the fact that the author had been saving them up in some notebook or other for years. In true pornographic form, he shows no embarrassment at all about deploying them here. Everything about "House of Holes", in fact, suggests an author on a lark. I, like just about everyone in "House of Holes," am more than willing to indulge him, even if he gets a bit cheesy on occasion. Authors will have thier fun.
Show More
fluids, fantastical sexual technologies, and consequence-free intercourse that doesn't have a lot to do with the world that we actually bump and grind in. Some of these stories -- such as the one that describes how a woman who's tired of being judged for her appearance finds satisfaction with a man whose head has been temporarily removed -- are both pleasingly ingenious and seem to be getting a larger truth about how real people relate to each other. Baker's also smart enough to realize that while most of us, sensibly enough, get off on release, some of us are turned on by restraint: this particular sexual paradise features a subgroup of men who make it a point not to gratify themselves. But those are the better stories in this collection. Some of the others are just, well, porn that's been effectively workshopped. I'm a dude myself, but I thought that the author wrote sex from the female perspective tolerably well, although "House of Holes" is, in the final analysis, straighter and more forthrightly cis that it necessarily needs to be. Genitals -- both male and female -- sometimes appear in less-than-expected places, but the essential duality of man and women doesn't come in for much questioning. This isn't a book for people who get off on ambiguity, or, for that matter, subtlety. The sort of ridiculous sex talk that's indelibly associated with letters to Penthouse is all over this collection, and it's good fun to see it in a relatively literary environment. There are so many ridiculous, gross, and just plain strange terms for genitalia here that I would lay money on the fact that the author had been saving them up in some notebook or other for years. In true pornographic form, he shows no embarrassment at all about deploying them here. Everything about "House of Holes", in fact, suggests an author on a lark. I, like just about everyone in "House of Holes," am more than willing to indulge him, even if he gets a bit cheesy on occasion. Authors will have thier fun.
Show Less
Awards
San Francisco Chronicle Best Book of the Year (Fiction — 2011)
Original publication date
2011