How God Became King: The Forgotten Story of the Gospels

by N. T. Wright

Hardcover, 2012





Posits that the true central story of the Gospels is the coronation of God through Jesus as the climax of all human history, which sets the groundwork for transforming the way we see our role and duties in the world today.


HarperOne (2012), Edition: 1st Edition, 282 pages


(46 ratings; 4.1)

User reviews

LibraryThing member WCHagen
This book has the potential to alter the course of our religion or, perhaps better said, the potential to bring it back on the path intended by the writers of the four Gospels. Wright’s main thesis is that we have over stressed the answers to the questions ‘Why was Jesus born?’ and ‘Why did
Show More
Jesus die?’ and under stressed the question ‘Why did Jesus live?’. The answer, he contends, is that he lived in order to usher into the world God as King and that message is clearly stated in the four Gospels.
There is a story line contained in the Old Testament that follows an iterative cycle (sometimes referred to as ‘The Exodus Cycle’ because it is most clearly stated there). The cycle proceeds as follows: A period of ‘living with God’ is followed by a fall which initiates an exile. The exile ends with a reawakening and then a period of atonement after which a messiah inaugurates a return to a state of God’s reign. The first recorded cycle begins with Eden and ends with Abraham as the messianic figure. The second is the Exodus story with David ushering in the ‘God with us’ period. The third cycle began with the Babylonian exile but the period of atonement (Second Temple period) was never terminated to the satisfaction of Jewish people. Christians recognize Jesus as Christ, i.e. Messiah, but not necessarily as the harbinger of God as King on earth or the ultimate climax of that third cycle. That is, according to Wright, the story contained in the Gospels. Jesus lived in order to prepare the people for God’s presence and the Passion of Christ is, in actuality, a coronation ceremony. God is back into our presence – if we can but recognize and accept it.
To some extent, the acceptance of Wright’s thesis requires a rethinking of mainstream ideas on Eschatology. We usually and traditionally think of ‘End Times’ as a future happening and there are some theologians who contend that the prophecies have been fulfilled and that we are now either in a state of limbo or the prophecies have been proven false. Wright and a few others take a third position referred to as either ‘initiated’ or ‘inaugurated’ eschatology that holds that we are living in the ‘end time’ era and waiting for the last judgment. In so doing, Wright assails such popular ideas as ‘rapture’ as a misreading of the Bible.
As a part of his argument and a point most likely to be most harshly criticized Wright suggests that part of the reason that Christianity has gone off the track is our over reliance on the Nicene and Apostle’s Creeds as the total sum and substance of our belief system. The Creeds, he contends, either ignore or subsumes at some hidden level the entire Gospel story. They served a valuable role in early Christianity in shaping our religion but have diverted us from the thrust of the Gospel story.
If the book has a fault it is that it does not clearly state what we as Christians must do to get our religion back on track other than to reread the four Gospels, preferably by reading each in turn at one sitting. This will, Wright promises, give us the proper macro view of their message and confirm his thesis.
Wright is not a fringe theologian. He is considered to be in the group of the top contemporary theologians in the world and the most esteemed conservative in that group. His most exhaustive academic work is contained in his three volume work Christian Origins and the Question of God (Fortress Press). Serious students of Wright should begin their study there but not be discouraged by its ponderous style and meticulous development of logical argumentation.
I heartedly recommend buying this book. As a matter of fact, you should buy three copies – one for yourself, one to give to your Pastor, and one to send to your denomination’s seminary. We should get the word out.
Show Less
LibraryThing member DubiousDisciple
Wright begins with the creeds, about Jesus being born of a virgin and dying for our sins, and bemoans the “missing middle.” Christianity today has become too focused on the beginning and end of the Jesus story, and has ignored a primary message of all four Gospels: that God has come back, in
Show More
the form of Jesus, and reigns today as King.

So who is the Jesus in the middle? A violent revolutionary? A wide-eyed apocalyptic visionary, expecting the end of the world? A mild-mannered teacher of sweet reasonableness? If he was one of the first two, Jesus was deluded. Even if it’s the third case, Jesus was similarly deluded, because most of his followers from that day to this have been anything but sweetly reasonable. Instead, they have busied themselves inventing dogmas (like the virgin birth and the resurrection), writing creeds, and establishing the church.

Thankfully, none of these Jesuses match the Gospels. Wright is sick of scholars and books which portray Jesus as a good Jewish boy who would have been horrified to see a church spring up in his name. He wants us to see Jesus the way the Gospels tell the story, as God coming down to be King of the earth. Wright’s guns are blazing in this book (his passion took me rather by surprise), firing at liberals and feel-gooders. God is no doddering old boss who used to run the company but has since been banished to a cozy upstairs office where he can sit and imagine he’s still in charge. God is king. The story of Jesus is the story of how Israel’s God became king.

Wright’s approach this time is not at all objective. He is a believing Trinitarian, and speaks out against the popular opinion that the high Christology of John is a later development. From the beginning, the Gospel story has been about the divine Jesus, Son of God, God Himself. On Mark’s very first page, the story of Jesus’ baptism, we find “every bit as high a Christology as John’s, though it is a high Jewish Christology.” Wright also discusses Matthew’s viewpoint and Luke’s viewpoint, in each case pointing out the evidence that they considered Jesus divine. Wright never quite nails down his definition of Christ’s divinity … none of this “Jesus is God” direct approach, just as no such claim exists in the scriptures … but we should make the association in some mystical way. For Wright, this verse in Luke says it all:

“Go back to your home,” said Jesus, “and tell them what God has done for you.” And he went off around every town, declaring what Jesus had done for him.

In the end, I am fully behind Wright’s view that the Gospels present Jesus as the fulfillment of God’s return to earth as King, and in my own mystical way I confess to be sort of a Trinitarian, but I simply can’t buy the argument that all of the Gospels contain the same high Christology as John’s Gospel. There are too many opposing arguments that Wright fails to address.
Show Less
LibraryThing member MarthaHuntley
I'm not a fan of N.T. Wright, and I hadn't even heard of this book before. But thinking lately about King Jesus, and having a long time interest in the full meaning of the Kingdom of Heaven, I was hoping, from its title, that this book would address some of that theology, and I was curious about
Show More
what N.T. Wright's take on it would be. As it turned out, I really did like the book. Wright is arguing for his version of a "Full Gospel" kind of theology that doesn't leave out the life and ministry and teachings of Jesus as the creeds, which move from "born of the Virgin Mary" to "suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and buried," do. Especially Wright is concerned that the main message of the Gospels, which has been overlooked and underexpressed in recent Christian thought, shows how interrelated the Kingdom of God and the Cross of Jesus are -- how it is through the cross that the Kingdom has come and is coming...and how Israel's history fulfilled in Jesus, the incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection of Jesus, and the Trinity itself, are all part of that big story of Jesus becoming King of Kings. I'd give this book 5 stars except that it isn't written all that clearly and compellingly. Still a very good book that I'm glad I read, and that I hope provokes a lot of fresh thought and good discussion.
Show Less
LibraryThing member MarthaJeanne
Tom Wright has this habit of making it clear that reading Tom Wright may be well and good, but that his book is really just setting you up to read The Book again, and hopefully get more out of it now.
LibraryThing member thornton37814
N. T. Wright takes a look at Jesus' purpose on earth by taking into account the Old Testament as well as what Christ revealed of His own purpose in the Gospels. It reveals truths about the Kingdom of God. He emphasizes the need to look at all of the Gospels. Somehow much of what the author was
Show More
trying to stress was lost to me as I cringed every time there was a sentence fragment, a sentence beginning with a conjunction, or other poor grammatical constructions. The book needed much additional editing, not only because of the grammatical errors, but also because the author repeated points or rambled unnecessarily in places.
Show Less
LibraryThing member stillatim
Good stuff; at this point I'm rarely surprised by anything Wright says, and I wasn't surprised here, but he does a nice job of setting up his arguments. If only he'd write scholarly things that were a bit shorter. Or really anything that was a bit shorter.
Page: 0.114 seconds